ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas mengenai wasiat yang melanggar bagian mutlak (Legitime Portie) anak kandung menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Skripsi ini mengambil studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Negeri tangerang atas perselisihan yang terjadi antara penerima wasiat dengan ahliwaris legitimaris. Permasalahan terjadi pada saat Pewaris membuat wasiat yang isinya menyatakan bahwa memberikan seluruh hartanya kepada salah satu anak kandungnya saja, padahal disini pewaris masih mempunyai ahliwaris lain yang merupakan ahliwaris legitimaris, yang berhak terhadap bagian mutlak dari harta warisan tesebut,da n bagian tersebut tidak dapat dikesampingkan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pewaris seringkali menggunakan kebebasannya untuk memberikan sebagian atau bahkan seluruhnya harta benda miliknya kepada siapa saja yang dikehendakinya, tanpa ia menyadari bahwa bagian mutlak ahliwaris yang seharusnya mendapatkan harta benda tersebut telah tersinggung pemberian wasiat yang dilakukannya. Dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 29/PDT.G/2010/PN.TNG, para ahliwaris legitimaris berhak mendapatkan bagiannya yang tidak bisa dikesampingan oleh pewaris. Karena dalam undangundang sendiri sudah diatur mengenai bagian mutlak (legitime portie), yang besarnya menurut pasal 914 Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata dengan cara pembagian seperti yang diatur dalam pasal 916a Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Penulis juga menyimpulkan bahwa Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 29/PDT.G/2010/PN.TNG tertanggal 11 Oktober 2010 yang dikeluarkan oleh majelis Hakim kurang tepat, dengan membatalkan Akta Wasiat No.08 tanggal 05 Mei 2009, karena seharusnya terhadap tuntutan bagian mutlak tersebut dilakukan pemotongan (inkorting) bukan pembatalan

---

ABSTRACT
This paper will discuss about the violation of the absolute part (Legitime Portie) biological children according to the Book of Law Civil Law. This paper takes a case study tangerang Court ruling on disputes between the receiver testament with legitimate legacy receiver. The set of problems occurs when the heir to make a testament stating that it gave his entire estate to one of the only biological child, but here the heir still have another the legitimate legacy receiver, have the right to the absolute part (Legitime Portie), and that part can not be ruled out. The author uses the method of juridical normative research, using secondary data.

This study concluded that the heirs are often using their freedom to provide some or even all of his property to whomever it chooses, without realizing that the absolute part (legitime portie) legitimate legacy receiver should get the property has offended the administration testament do. Within the decision Tangerang District Court No. 29/PDT.G/2010/PN.TNG, the legitimate legacy receiver have the part that can not be ruled out by the heir. Because the statute itself is set on the absolute part (legitime portie), which in this case there are three (3) legitimate legacy receiver, the amount under section 914 of Act Book of the Civil Code which each of the three-quarters (3/4) part, by the division as provided in section 916a of Act Book of the Civil Code. Authors also conclude that the Tangerang District Court Decision No. 29/PDT.G/2010/PN.TNG dated October 11, 2010 issued by the presiding judge who tried the case has been very proper, the judge's will cancel the testament Deed No.08 dated May 5, 2009, basic consideration is that the judge in deciding is the treasure to EA are the entire property ED. Judge to consider other than the ED has legitimate legacy receiver EA should get his share, EI and MH as a child of the ED has the absolute that can not be contested by the ED. These actions have resulted EI and MH can be lost their rights.