Skripsi ini mengkaji konflik antara kewajiban negara untuk melindungi hak asasi manusia (HAM) dengan kewajiban negara untuk melindungi hak investor asing, suatu permasalahan yang sering terjadi ketika negara menghadapi kasus-kasus pelanggaran HAM yang terkait dengan investasi asing. Melalui penelitian yuridis- normatif, skripsi ini membahas pengaturan HAM dan hak investor asing dalam hukum internasional, serta konsekuensi hukum bagi negara akibat praktiknya dalam menghadapi kasus-kasus pelanggaran HAM yang terkait dengan investasi asing. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berbagai sumber hukum internasional memberikan kewajiban kepada negara untuk melindungi HAM dan juga untuk melindungi hak investor asing. Jika negara tidak melindungi HAM demi kepentingan investor asing, negara dapat divonis melanggar kewajibannya melindungi HAM. Di lain pihak, jika negara melindungi HAM dengan mengorbankan investor asing, negara dapat divonis melanggar kewajiban untuk melindungi hak investor asing. Namun, negara dapat dibebaskan dari gugatan pelanggaran hak investor asing apabila tindakan negara yang merugikan investor asing demi perlindungan HAM memenuhi kriteria-kriteria tertentu.

---

This study discusses the conflict between state duty to protect human rights and state duty to protect the rights of foreign investors, a problem which often occurs when states are dealing with human rights cases related to foreign investments. By using the juridical-normative research method, this study elaborates how international law regulates human rights and the rights of foreign investors, along with the legal consequences for states for their practices in dealing with human rights cases related to foreign investment.

The research shows that various sources of international law give states the duty to protect human rights and also the duty to protect the rights of foreign investors. If the state did not protect human rights for the convenience of foreign investors, states could be judged to be breaching its obligation to protect human rights. On the other hand, if states protect human rights at the cost of foreign investors, states could be judged to be violating the rights of foreign investors. However, states can also be exempted from such judgment, given that the state?s human rights measures which incur losses for foreign investors fulfill certain criterias.