ABSTRAK
Suatu pelaksanaan lelang sudah seharusnya berpedoman pada asas-asas lelang danmemenuhi prosedur umum lelang yang berlaku dalam peraturan lelang. Begitupula halnya dengan pelaksanaan lelang Benda Berharga Asal Muatan Kapal YangTenggelam (BMKT) hasil pengangkatan dari perairan Laut Jawa Utara Cirebon.Lelang BMKT juga seharusnya berpedoman pada asas-asas lelang dan memenuhiprosedur umum lelang yang berlaku dalam peraturan lelang. Lelang dilaksanakansebanyak 3 (tiga) kali pada tahun 2010 terhadap BMKT yang berstatus selainBarang Milik Negara (BMN). Namun, ternyata pelaksanaan lelang tidak berhasilatau tidak ada penawaran. Oleh karena itu, penulis menganalisis permasalahanbagaimana penerapan asas-asas lelang pada pelaksanaan lelang BMKT dankesesuaian lelang BMKT tersebut dengan prosedur lelang. Dari penelitian, penulismenemukan bahwa dalam lelang BMKT tidak memenuhi asas-asas lelangkhususnya asas kompetisi. Beberapa tahapan dalam prosedur lelang tersebut tidakterlaksana secara optimal, khususnya penentuan mekanisme atau strategipenawaran barang dalam lelang, nilai limit, dan uang jaminan penawaran lelang.Dalam penelitian juga ditemukan bahwa besaran nilai limit dan uang jaminanpenawaran lelang yang ditetapkan PANNAS BMKT terlalu tinggi. Keterbatasanwaktu pelunasan harga lelang juga memberatkan para peminat lelang. Selain itu,penjualan BMKT dalam 1 (satu) lot kiranya juga membatasi peminat lelangkarena hanya peminat lelang yang memiliki kemampuan ekonomi besar saja yangdapat mengikuti lelang. Seharusnya Panitia Nasional Pengangkatan DanPemanfaatan BMKT (PANNAS BMKT) selaku penjual memanfaatkan Pasal 38Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 93/PMK.06/2010 Tentang PetunjukPelaksanaan Lelang, untuk merubah nilai limit dan Pasal 71 ayat (2) PeraturanMenteri Keuangan Nomor 93/PMK.06/2010 Tentang Petunjuk PelaksanaanLelang, dalam hal pengecualian jangka waktu pembayaran harga lelang.

---

ABSTRACT
Auctions were supposed to be based on auction?s principles and procedure.Likewise, the implementation of Valuable Objects From Sunken Ship auctionexcavated from the Java Sea about 90 miles North West from the city of Cirebon.The Valuable Objects From Sunken Ship auction was supposed to be based onauction?s principle and procedure. The Valuable Objects From Sunken Shipwhich are not categorized as State-owned Goods auctioned 3 (three) times in the2010. However, these auctions were unsuccesful because nobody participated inauctions. Therefore the writer is interested to analyze the application of auction?sprinciples and auction?s procedure in those auctions. From the research the writerfound that the auction principles in Valuable Objects from Sunken Ship Auctiondid not fulfilled particularly in competition principle. The several stages in theauction procedure were also not implemented optimally, particularly thedetermination of auction terms. In addition, this research also found that thevalues of reserve price and bidding deposit determined by National Committeefor The Salvage and Utilization of Valuable Objects from Sunken Ships are toohigh. A time limitation of auction price was incriminated the person whointerested in auction. In addition, the selling of Valuable Objects From SunkenShip may also limit the person who interested in auction because only people whohave much money can participate in auction.The National Committee for TheSalvage and Utilization of Valuable Objects from Sunken Ships as a vendor wasought to use Article 38 of The Ministry of Finance Regulation No.93 Year 2010,to change reserve price and Article 71 paragraph (2) of The Ministry of FinanceRegulation No.93 Year 2010, to provide more time for purchasers to pay theauction price.