ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mengkaji masalah kompetensi. Bertitik tolak dari penelitian terdahulu
dan beragam journal, maka ditengarai, job specification menjadi landasan bagi
kompetensi. Dalam konteks ini, kompetensi selaras dengan job specification. Namun
dalam kenyataannya tidaklah demikian.
Paradigma dan Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah positivistic quantitative. Jenis dan
sifat penelitian ini adalah explanative correlational dan associative. Populasi sasaran
sebanyak 94 pegawai, dan teknik penarikan sampel yang digunakan adalah non
probability-purposive sampling dengan menggunakan total sampling, maka sampel
sasarannya juga sebanyak 94 responden. Sumber data penelitian ini meliputi primary
secondary data. Sedangkan metode pengumpulan data meliputi: metode observasi,
metode dokumentasi, metode kuesioner dan metode survey.
Dilakukan pre test untuk keperluan uji kualitas data yang hanya meliputi uji
instrument penelitian. Mengingat penelitian tidak menggunakan regression analysis
model. Pada uji instrument penelitian, khususnya uji validitas digunakan uji KMO
sedangkan uji reliabilitas digunakan cronbach’s alpha dan untuk metode analisis data
digunakan univariate analysis dan importance performance analysis.
Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesesuaian antara aktualitas atau
kenyataan dengan harapan atau kepentingan kompetensi adalah tinggi. Kendati demikian,
ada beberapa dimensi kompetensi yang harus diupayakan peningkatannya yaitu skill dan
attitude. Karena, dari hasil temuan di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa a. information
seeking; b. team work and cooperation; dan c. technical / profesional / managerial
expertise tergolong rendah tingkat kompentensinya. Jadi kurang selaras dengan job
specification.
ABSTRACTThis study examines the issue of competence. Pointed start from previous research
and a variety of journals, it is suspected, job specification as the basis for competence. In
this context, competencies aligned with the job specification. But in reality it is not.
Paradigm and positivistic research approach is quantitative. The type and nature of
the study was correlational and associative explanative. Target population as much as 94
employees, and the techniques sample collecting is non-probability purposive sampling
using total sampling, the target sample as well as 94 respondents. Data sources include
primary secondary research data. While the methods of data collection include :
observation, documentation methods, methods of question naires and survey methods.
Pre-test conducted for the purpose of testing the quality of the test data that only
includes the research instrument. Given, the study did not user egression analysis models.
In the test the research instrument, particularly the validity test is used while the KMO
test reliability test used Cronbach's alpha. As for the method of data analysis, used
univariate analysis and the importance performance analysis.
The results showed that the level of concord ance between factual or reality with
expectations or interests of competence is high. Nevertheless, there are several
dimensions that should be pursued competency increase the skiil and attitude. Because of
the findings in the field showed that : a. information seeking, b. team workand
cooperation, and c. technical/professional/managerial expertise. Thirdly it is low
competence level. Lesssoin tune with the job specification.
T35008-Nurhayati Rospita Sari.pdf :: Unduh