[
ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas tentang Proses Kebijakan Pembelian Alutsista Sukhoi pada
tahun 2003. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui latar belakang yakni kondisi alutsista
Indonesia pasca Embargo Amerika Serikat. Tahap-tahap dan proses tarik-menarik
kepentingan di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) pada saat itu. Lebih dalam lagi,
penelitian ini mengkaji soal anggaran pertahanan, sepesifikasi pesawat sejenis sukhoi,
proses-proses persidangan dan konsensus di DPR.
Pertanyaan pokok penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kewenangan kementerian
perindustrian dan perdagangan dalam proses imbal beli alutsista sukhoi pada tahun 2003?
Dan mengapa terjadi tarik-menarik kepentingan (power interplay) panja sukhoi di DPR?.
Dengan sub-sub pertanyaan, Bagaimana rancangan anggaran pertahanan pada tahun
1999-2004? Apa saja pesawat yang sejenis dengan sukhoi? Bagaimana mekanisme imbal
beli dengan pemerintah Rusia? Mengapa terbentuk panja sukhoi di DPR? Dan bagaimana
proses konsensus antara DPR dan Pemerintah?.
Teori utama yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Teori Kebijakan. Dengan teori
pendukung yakni teori kontrol sipil dan teori konsensus. Penelitian ini menggunakan
pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif analitis untuk menganalisa data-data yang
diperoleh. Pengumpulan data diperoleh dari studi pustaka, observasi dan wawancara
mendalam 8 informan dengan background: politisi, peneliti, militer, birokrat dan
akademisi.
Penelitian ini menemukan tentang proses perencanaan pembelian sukhoi yang tidak
matang ditengah kondisi pasca krisis, era reformasi mengharuskan sipil (baca; DPR dan
Menteri Pertahanan) memiliki otoritas menentukan kebijakan dalam proses pembelian
sukhoi tersebut dan proses konsensus dari DPR kemudian direkomendasikan ke
pemerintah untuk memperbaiki proses pembelian sesuai mekanisme prosedur yang
ada.Temuan penelitian ini adalah keputusan pemerintah dengan mekanisme imbal beli
Sukhoi dan komoditi CPO, dimana mekanisme tersebut belum diatur di negara kita.
Lebih kepada proses perencanaan yang kurang matang, padahal William Dunn menyebut
proses perencanaan bagian dari proses penentuan kebijakan.
Implikasi teoritis dalam penelitian ini menguatkan teori Huntington ?civilian control
objective? bahwaotoritas militer berada dalam otoritas rendah.Pada proses pembelian
sukhoi, justru Kementerian Pertahanan yang pada saat itu dijabat oleh sipil yakni (alm)
Matori Abdul Jalil tidak dilibatkan dalam proses imbal beli sukhoi tersebut, namun
diambil alih oleh Mabes TNI menyalahi prosedur perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian
ini adalah proses konsensus sesuai dengan Teori Konsensus Arend Lijphart, dimana
mayoritas anggota Komisi I DPR menyetujui untuk mengembalikan kewenangan kepada
Kementerian Pertahanan dalam proses pembelian alutsista, bukan Kementerian
Perdagangan yang menyalahi prosedur.
ABSTRACTThis study discusses The Process Alutsista Sukhoi Purchasing Policy in 2003. The
purpose of this study to determine the background of the conditions of armaments
Indonesia after the U.S. embargo. The stages and processes of conflicts of interest in the
House of Representatives ( DPR ) at the time. More deeply, this study examines the
matter of the defense budget, specs similar aircraft Sukhoi, court processes and consensus
in Parliament.
The central question of this research is how the authority of the ministry of industry and
trade in the process of purchasing defense equipment returns Sukhoi in 2003? And why
the tug of interest (power interplay ) Sukhoi in DPR?. With the sub- sub- questions, How
to draft defense budget in 1999-2004? What are the similar to the Sukhoi aircraft? How
counter trade mechanism with the Russian government? Why Sukhoi formed in DPR?
And how the process of consensus between the Parliament and the Government?.
The main theory used in this study is the theory of policy. By supporting the theory of
civilian control theory and the theory of consensus. This study used a qualitative
approach with descriptive analytical method to analyze the data obtained. The collection
of data obtained from literature, observation and in-depth interviews with eight
informants background: politicians, researchers, military, bureaucrats and academics.
The study found the planning process is not mature Sukhoi purchases amid post-crisis
conditions, requires reform era civilian (read: the House of Representatives and the
Secretary of Defense) has the authority to determine the policy of the Sukhoi purchase
process and consensus process of the House of Representatives and then recommended to
the government to improve the buying process appropriate mechanism ada. Research
Finding procedures of this study is the government's decision to buy Sukhoi and reward
mechanisms CPO, where such mechanisms have not been regulated in our country. More
to the planning process are less mature, whereas William Dunn calls this process a part of
the planning decision-making process.
The theoretical implications of this study corroborate the theory of Huntington "objective
civilian control" military that authority are in the process of purchasing Sukhoi low. Since
authority, the Ministry of Defence which is precisely at that time occupied by the civilian
Matori Abdul Jalil is not involved in the purchasing process returns the Sukhoi, but was
taken over by the TNI headquarters violated statutory procedures. These results are in
accordance with the consensus process Consensus Theory Arend Lijphart, where the
majority of members of Commission I of the House agreed to restore the authority of the
Ministry of Defence in the process of purchasing defense equipment, not the Ministry of
Commerce that violated procedures.;This study discusses The Process Alutsista Sukhoi Purchasing Policy in 2003. The
purpose of this study to determine the background of the conditions of armaments
Indonesia after the U.S. embargo. The stages and processes of conflicts of interest in the
House of Representatives ( DPR ) at the time. More deeply, this study examines the
matter of the defense budget, specs similar aircraft Sukhoi, court processes and consensus
in Parliament.
The central question of this research is how the authority of the ministry of industry and
trade in the process of purchasing defense equipment returns Sukhoi in 2003? And why
the tug of interest (power interplay ) Sukhoi in DPR?. With the sub- sub- questions, How
to draft defense budget in 1999-2004? What are the similar to the Sukhoi aircraft? How
counter trade mechanism with the Russian government? Why Sukhoi formed in DPR?
And how the process of consensus between the Parliament and the Government?.
The main theory used in this study is the theory of policy. By supporting the theory of
civilian control theory and the theory of consensus. This study used a qualitative
approach with descriptive analytical method to analyze the data obtained. The collection
of data obtained from literature, observation and in-depth interviews with eight
informants background: politicians, researchers, military, bureaucrats and academics.
The study found the planning process is not mature Sukhoi purchases amid post-crisis
conditions, requires reform era civilian (read: the House of Representatives and the
Secretary of Defense) has the authority to determine the policy of the Sukhoi purchase
process and consensus process of the House of Representatives and then recommended to
the government to improve the buying process appropriate mechanism ada. Research
Finding procedures of this study is the government's decision to buy Sukhoi and reward
mechanisms CPO, where such mechanisms have not been regulated in our country. More
to the planning process are less mature, whereas William Dunn calls this process a part of
the planning decision-making process.
The theoretical implications of this study corroborate the theory of Huntington "objective
civilian control" military that authority are in the process of purchasing Sukhoi low. Since
authority, the Ministry of Defence which is precisely at that time occupied by the civilian
Matori Abdul Jalil is not involved in the purchasing process returns the Sukhoi, but was
taken over by the TNI headquarters violated statutory procedures. These results are in
accordance with the consensus process Consensus Theory Arend Lijphart, where the
majority of members of Commission I of the House agreed to restore the authority of the
Ministry of Defence in the process of purchasing defense equipment, not the Ministry of
Commerce that violated procedures., This study discusses The Process Alutsista Sukhoi Purchasing Policy in 2003. The
purpose of this study to determine the background of the conditions of armaments
Indonesia after the U.S. embargo. The stages and processes of conflicts of interest in the
House of Representatives ( DPR ) at the time. More deeply, this study examines the
matter of the defense budget, specs similar aircraft Sukhoi, court processes and consensus
in Parliament.
The central question of this research is how the authority of the ministry of industry and
trade in the process of purchasing defense equipment returns Sukhoi in 2003? And why
the tug of interest (power interplay ) Sukhoi in DPR?. With the sub- sub- questions, How
to draft defense budget in 1999-2004? What are the similar to the Sukhoi aircraft? How
counter trade mechanism with the Russian government? Why Sukhoi formed in DPR?
And how the process of consensus between the Parliament and the Government?.
The main theory used in this study is the theory of policy. By supporting the theory of
civilian control theory and the theory of consensus. This study used a qualitative
approach with descriptive analytical method to analyze the data obtained. The collection
of data obtained from literature, observation and in-depth interviews with eight
informants background: politicians, researchers, military, bureaucrats and academics.
The study found the planning process is not mature Sukhoi purchases amid post-crisis
conditions, requires reform era civilian (read: the House of Representatives and the
Secretary of Defense) has the authority to determine the policy of the Sukhoi purchase
process and consensus process of the House of Representatives and then recommended to
the government to improve the buying process appropriate mechanism ada. Research
Finding procedures of this study is the government's decision to buy Sukhoi and reward
mechanisms CPO, where such mechanisms have not been regulated in our country. More
to the planning process are less mature, whereas William Dunn calls this process a part of
the planning decision-making process.
The theoretical implications of this study corroborate the theory of Huntington "objective
civilian control" military that authority are in the process of purchasing Sukhoi low. Since
authority, the Ministry of Defence which is precisely at that time occupied by the civilian
Matori Abdul Jalil is not involved in the purchasing process returns the Sukhoi, but was
taken over by the TNI headquarters violated statutory procedures. These results are in
accordance with the consensus process Consensus Theory Arend Lijphart, where the
majority of members of Commission I of the House agreed to restore the authority of the
Ministry of Defence in the process of purchasing defense equipment, not the Ministry of
Commerce that violated procedures.]
T39190-Aridho Pamungkas.pdf :: Unduh