ABSTRAK
Skripsi ini membahas tentang analisa putusan hakim yang menyatakan tergugattelah wanprestasi berdasarkan Putusan No. 267 PK/PDT/2011. Penelitian iniadalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasil penelitianmenyarankan agar hakim dalam putusannya menerapkan asas memuat dasaralasan yang jelas dan rinci; putusan yang dijatuhkan harus berdasarkanpertimbangan yang jelas dan cukup sebagaimana yang ditegaskan pada Pasal 25Ayat (1) UU No.4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman dan Pasal 178 Ayat(1) HIR.

---

ABSTRACT
The focus of this study is the analysis of court decision that the defendant hasbeen declared in default by decision No. 267 PK/PDT/2011. The purpose of thisstudy is to understand if judges considerations of court decision No.397/Pdt.G/2006/PN.JKT.PST, court decision No. 24/PDT/2008/PT.DKI, courtdecision No. 56 K/Pdt/2009, and court decision No. 267 PK/PDT/2011 is right.This research is qualitative descriptive interpretive. The data were collected byliterature research. The researcher suggest that suggested that the judge in hisdecision to apply the principles contain a clear rationale and detailed; decisionhanded down should be based on clear and sufficient consideration as defined inArticle 25 Paragraph (1) of Act 4 of 2004 on Judicial Power and Article 178Paragraph (1 ) HIR.