[
ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai perbandingan perjanjian perdagangan bebas yang
diikuti oleh Indonesia dalam kerangka kerjasama antara ASEAN dan Keempat Mitra
Wicara. Substansi yang diperbandingkan dalam penulisan ini adalah pengaturan
perdagangan barang atau trade in goods. Keempat perjanjian ini memiliki persamaan
dan perbedaan. Perbandingan yang menjadi fokus utama pembahasan adalah
bagaimana tiap-tiap perjanjian memenuhi teori keadilan dalam perdagangan liberal.
Berdasarkan hasil analis, dicari upaya yang disediakan oleh setiap perjanjian
perdagangan bebas bagi negara berkembang yang merasa tidak diuntungkan. Teori
critical legal studiesdigunakan dalam menganalisa upaya dan merujuk pada ketentuan
pada perjanjian perdagangan bebas yang diikuti oleh Indonesia. Penelitian merupakan
penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode analisa data kualitatif data diperoleh
dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan.
Tidak ada perbedaan mendasar dalam pengaturan perdagangan barang dalam
perjanjian-perjanjian perdagangan barang antara ASEAN dan keempat Mitra Wicara.
Pengaturan perdagangan barang dalam keempat perjanjian perdagangan barang ini
telah berusaha memenuhi prinsip keadilan dalam perdagangan liberal, namun bentuk
keadilan berupa perlakuan berbeda bagi negara yang paling tidak diuntungkan dalam
hal ini adalah negara berkembang, hanya bersifat sementara.Negara berkembang
sebagai pengimpor sulit untuk melakukan negoisasi yang membutuhkan prosedur
yang panjang.Terhitung pada tanggal pemberlakuan liberalisasi penuh special
differential treatment ini akan dihapuskan. Terhadap perjanjian-perjanjian
perdagangan bebas yang dirasa tidak adil atau tidak mampu untuk dilaksanakan oleh
suatu negara seperti negara berkembang maka terdapat 2 langkah kebijakan yang
dapat diambil oleh pemerintah negara yang bersangkutan.
Mengingat sulitnya upaya melakukan perubahan atas isi perjanjian yang disepakati.
Pemerintah Indonesia harus lebih memperhatikan perjanjian-perjanjian perdagangan
bebas yang akan ditandatangani nantinya. Pilihan yang paling realistis untuk saat ini
bagi Indonesia adalah tetap memberlakukan perjanjian-perjanjian perdagangan bebas
dalam Kerangka Kerjasama ASEAN yang telah disepakati. Demikian, dengan realitas
kemampuan Indonesia saat ini hal yang dapat dilakukan adalah memfokuskan diri
pada perbaikan kinerja industri lokal (modal, pendidikan, keahlian dan teknologi).
ABSTRACTThis research discusses the comparison of the free trade agreements Indonesia enters
into in the cooperative framework between ASEAN and the four Dialogue Partners.
The substance upon which this research compares is the regulation of trade in goods.
These four agreements share some similarities as well as differences. The comparison
that serves as the main focus of the discussion is how every agreement satisfies the
theory of justice in liberal trades. An analysis of each agreement is performed to look
for the terms by which a disadvantaged developing country can seek to address the
justice it perceives. The theory of critical legal studies is employed in analyzing and
refering to the terms in the free trade agreements joined by Indonesia. This research is
a legal-normative research with qualitative analysis of the data obtained from
literature studies.
There are no fundamental differences in the regulation of trade in goods in the trade
in goods agreements between ASEAN and the four Dialogue Partners. The regulation
of the trade in goods within these four trade in goods agreements has sought to satisfy
the principle of justice in liberal trades. However, the equity that takes form in the
differential treatments for the most disadvantaged countries,which in this case are
developing countries, is only temporary in nature. An importing developing country
finds it difficult to be in anegotation that undertakes long procedures. By the time the
liberalization swings in full effect, this special differential treatment will be
abolished. With regards to the free trade agreements perceived to be inequitable or
unperformable by a country such as a developing country, there are two policy
measures that the government of such country can take.
Taking into account the difficulty in amending the agreed-upon terms, the
Government of Indonesia has to pay more attention to the free trade agreements it is
about to enter into. The most realistic choice for Indonesia at this moment is to keep
respecting the free trade agreements in the agreed ASEAN Cooperative Framework.
With this reality in mind, Indonesia has to focus on the improvement of the
performance of local industries (capital, education, skills and technology).;This research discusses the comparison of the free trade agreements Indonesia enters
into in the cooperative framework between ASEAN and the four Dialogue Partners.
The substance upon which this research compares is the regulation of trade in goods.
These four agreements share some similarities as well as differences. The comparison
that serves as the main focus of the discussion is how every agreement satisfies the
theory of justice in liberal trades. An analysis of each agreement is performed to look
for the terms by which a disadvantaged developing country can seek to address the
justice it perceives. The theory of critical legal studies is employed in analyzing and
refering to the terms in the free trade agreements joined by Indonesia. This research is
a legal-normative research with qualitative analysis of the data obtained from
literature studies.
There are no fundamental differences in the regulation of trade in goods in the trade
in goods agreements between ASEAN and the four Dialogue Partners. The regulation
of the trade in goods within these four trade in goods agreements has sought to satisfy
the principle of justice in liberal trades. However, the equity that takes form in the
differential treatments for the most disadvantaged countries,which in this case are
developing countries, is only temporary in nature. An importing developing country
finds it difficult to be in anegotation that undertakes long procedures. By the time the
liberalization swings in full effect, this special differential treatment will be
abolished. With regards to the free trade agreements perceived to be inequitable or
unperformable by a country such as a developing country, there are two policy
measures that the government of such country can take.
Taking into account the difficulty in amending the agreed-upon terms, the
Government of Indonesia has to pay more attention to the free trade agreements it is
about to enter into. The most realistic choice for Indonesia at this moment is to keep
respecting the free trade agreements in the agreed ASEAN Cooperative Framework.
With this reality in mind, Indonesia has to focus on the improvement of the
performance of local industries (capital, education, skills and technology)., This research discusses the comparison of the free trade agreements Indonesia enters
into in the cooperative framework between ASEAN and the four Dialogue Partners.
The substance upon which this research compares is the regulation of trade in goods.
These four agreements share some similarities as well as differences. The comparison
that serves as the main focus of the discussion is how every agreement satisfies the
theory of justice in liberal trades. An analysis of each agreement is performed to look
for the terms by which a disadvantaged developing country can seek to address the
justice it perceives. The theory of critical legal studies is employed in analyzing and
refering to the terms in the free trade agreements joined by Indonesia. This research is
a legal-normative research with qualitative analysis of the data obtained from
literature studies.
There are no fundamental differences in the regulation of trade in goods in the trade
in goods agreements between ASEAN and the four Dialogue Partners. The regulation
of the trade in goods within these four trade in goods agreements has sought to satisfy
the principle of justice in liberal trades. However, the equity that takes form in the
differential treatments for the most disadvantaged countries,which in this case are
developing countries, is only temporary in nature. An importing developing country
finds it difficult to be in anegotation that undertakes long procedures. By the time the
liberalization swings in full effect, this special differential treatment will be
abolished. With regards to the free trade agreements perceived to be inequitable or
unperformable by a country such as a developing country, there are two policy
measures that the government of such country can take.
Taking into account the difficulty in amending the agreed-upon terms, the
Government of Indonesia has to pay more attention to the free trade agreements it is
about to enter into. The most realistic choice for Indonesia at this moment is to keep
respecting the free trade agreements in the agreed ASEAN Cooperative Framework.
With this reality in mind, Indonesia has to focus on the improvement of the
performance of local industries (capital, education, skills and technology).]
T42690-Winda Yasmine.pdf :: Unduh