[
ABSTRAKPasal 15 ayat 1 Undang-undang No 2 Tahun 2014 jelas disebutkan bahwa akta
Notaris merupakan akta otentik yang memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang
sempurna. Namun dalam kenyataannya akta Notaris dapat juga dibatalkan di
pengadilan. Jika dikemudian hari timbul gugatan atau ada pihak yang menyangkal
isi perjanjian yang telah dibuat, diharapkan bisa diselesaikan dengan cara
kekeluargaan, namun apabila tidak mencapai kesepakatan, demi keadilan dapat
mengajukan upaya hukum. Upaya hukum yang dimaksudkan adalah pengajuan
perkara atau gugatan ke Pengadilan Negeri setempat. Atas dasar hal tersebut
muncul permasalahan antara lain Apakah notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum yang
membuat akta sesuai syarat formil ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Republik
Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor
30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris mempunyai perlindungan hukum atas
akta yang dibuatnya ? Dan Apakah putusan pengadilan dapat membatalkan akta
persetujuan membuka kredit nomor 118 tanggal 30 November 2009 yang dibuat
oleh notaris H. Subandi,S.H berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri No
117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, tanggal 17 Oktober 2011? Dalam menjawab pertanyaan
tersebut penulis melakukan penelitian dengan menggunakan metode penelitian,
pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan penelitian deskriptif analitis,
serta menggunakan sumber data sekunder kemudian didapat hasil penelitian
bahwa Perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris yang dijadikan turut tergugat hanya
bertanggung jawab atas syarat formil suatu pembuatan akta. Akibat hukum dari
putusan pengadilan yang dijatuhkan oleh Pengadilan terhadap Notaris bahwa
notaris tidak dapat dikatakan telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap pembuatan
akta perjanjian tersebut, karena apa yang dituangkan dalam suatu akta notaris
adalah kehendak dari para pihak. Dalam kasus putusan Pengadilan Negeri
Kepanjen nomor 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, tanggal 17 Oktober 2011, Notaris tidak
dapat dipersalahkan karena Notaris dalam membuat akta persetujuan kredit telah
memenuhi syarat-syarat formil dan materil pembuatan akta, sehingga putusan
pengadilan tidak dapat membatalkan akta notaris.
ABSTRACTArticle 15 (1) Law of Republic Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30
of 2004 clearly mentioned that the notarial deed is authentic act which certainly
has probative force perfect, but in reality notarial deed can also be canceled in
court. If the claim arises in the future, or there are those who deny that the
agreement has been made, is expected to be completed by way of the family, but
if it does not reach an agreement for the sake of justice may file legal action.
Remedies are intended litigation or lawsuit to the District Court on the basis that
problems arise, among others, Whether the issue arises as a notary as a public
official who made the appropriate deed formal requirements in terms of the Law
of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30 of 2004 on
notary office has the legal protection of the deed he made no 118 dated 30
November 2009 ? And Whether the court?s decision to invalidate a deed no 118
dated 30 November 2009 made by a notary, H. Subandi, S.H. in associated with
the decision of the district court Kepanjen 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of
October 17, 2011? In answering these questions the authors conducted a research
study using normative juridical approach using descriptive analytical research, as
well as the use of secondary data sources and then obtained the results of research
that legal protection against the notary who made co-defendant was only
responsible for a formal deed. Legal effect of the court decision handed down by
the Court to the notary that the notary can not be said to have violated the
agreement deed, because what is stated in a notarial deed is the will of the parties.
In case the decision of the district court Kepanjen number
117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of October 17, 2011, notary could not be
prosecuted because he has fulfilled the terms of the formal and material deed, so
that the court can not annul the decision of the notarial deed.;Article 15 (1) Law of Republic Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30
of 2004 clearly mentioned that the notarial deed is authentic act which certainly
has probative force perfect, but in reality notarial deed can also be canceled in
court. If the claim arises in the future, or there are those who deny that the
agreement has been made, is expected to be completed by way of the family, but
if it does not reach an agreement for the sake of justice may file legal action.
Remedies are intended litigation or lawsuit to the District Court on the basis that
problems arise, among others, Whether the issue arises as a notary as a public
official who made the appropriate deed formal requirements in terms of the Law
of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30 of 2004 on
notary office has the legal protection of the deed he made no 118 dated 30
November 2009 ? And Whether the court’s decision to invalidate a deed no 118
dated 30 November 2009 made by a notary, H. Subandi, S.H. in associated with
the decision of the district court Kepanjen 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of
October 17, 2011? In answering these questions the authors conducted a research
study using normative juridical approach using descriptive analytical research, as
well as the use of secondary data sources and then obtained the results of research
that legal protection against the notary who made co-defendant was only
responsible for a formal deed. Legal effect of the court decision handed down by
the Court to the notary that the notary can not be said to have violated the
agreement deed, because what is stated in a notarial deed is the will of the parties.
In case the decision of the district court Kepanjen number
117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of October 17, 2011, notary could not be
prosecuted because he has fulfilled the terms of the formal and material deed, so
that the court can not annul the decision of the notarial deed., Article 15 (1) Law of Republic Indonesia No 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30
of 2004 clearly mentioned that the notarial deed is authentic act which certainly
has probative force perfect, but in reality notarial deed can also be canceled in
court. If the claim arises in the future, or there are those who deny that the
agreement has been made, is expected to be completed by way of the family, but
if it does not reach an agreement for the sake of justice may file legal action.
Remedies are intended litigation or lawsuit to the District Court on the basis that
problems arise, among others, Whether the issue arises as a notary as a public
official who made the appropriate deed formal requirements in terms of the Law
of the Republic of Indonesia No. 2 of 2014 Amendments Act No. 30 of 2004 on
notary office has the legal protection of the deed he made no 118 dated 30
November 2009 ? And Whether the court’s decision to invalidate a deed no 118
dated 30 November 2009 made by a notary, H. Subandi, S.H. in associated with
the decision of the district court Kepanjen 117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of
October 17, 2011? In answering these questions the authors conducted a research
study using normative juridical approach using descriptive analytical research, as
well as the use of secondary data sources and then obtained the results of research
that legal protection against the notary who made co-defendant was only
responsible for a formal deed. Legal effect of the court decision handed down by
the Court to the notary that the notary can not be said to have violated the
agreement deed, because what is stated in a notarial deed is the will of the parties.
In case the decision of the district court Kepanjen number
117/Pdt.G/2011/PN.KPJ, date of October 17, 2011, notary could not be
prosecuted because he has fulfilled the terms of the formal and material deed, so
that the court can not annul the decision of the notarial deed.]
T42121-Amazia Fetriansjah Kusumaningtyas.pdf :: Unduh