UI - Tesis Membership :: Kembali

UI - Tesis Membership :: Kembali

Pelanggaran jabatan notaris dalam membuat salinan akta keterangan penetapan risalah rapat (studi kasus putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris Nomor : 01/B/Mj.PPN/V/2013) = The breach of notary duty in regards to the making copies of the deed of description of the determination of minutes of meeting (case study of the notary central supervisory council decree No. 01/B/Mj.PPN/V/ 2013)

Paramita Dian Irawati; Fathiah Helmi, supervisor; Hendriani Parwitasari, examiner; Wenny Setiawati, examiner (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014)

 Abstrak

[ABSTRAK
Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang berwenang membuat akta otentik, dapat
dibebani tanggung jawab atas perbuatannya sehubungan dengan pekerjaannya
dalam pembuatan akta. Kelalaian dalam pembuatan suatu akta otentik yang
dilakukan oleh seorang Notaris dapat menyebabkan akta itu kehilangan
keotentikannya danlanya alcan menjadiakta di bawah tangan jikaditandatangani
oleh para pihak dalam akta tersebut. Jika di kemudian hari terdapat masalah atas
akta itu dan para pihak yang membuat akta itu merasa dirugikan atas kelalaian
No-taris tersebut, mereka berhak mgnunlul g4nti rugi kepada Notarfg yaqg
bersangkutan. Salah satu contoh pelanggaran yang dilakukan Notaris dalam
menjalankan jabatawrya adalah pelanggaran dalam hal pembuatan al
diantaranya adalah mernbuat salinan akta yang berbeda isinya dengan minuta
aktanya. Pelanggaran tersebut dapat dilihat dalam kasus pelanggaran yang
dilakukan oleh Notaris Y, sebagaimana ternyata dalam Putusan Majelis Pengawas
Pusat Notaris tanggal 19 Juni 2013 Nomor 0l/B/Tvfj.PPNN/2013. Dari hasil
penelitian ini, menunjukkan bahwa Notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya
harus berpegang teguh pada Asas-Asas Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris yang
bailq terutama pada Asas Kecermatan dan Asas Profesionalitaq dimana Notaris
dituntut harus bersikap lebih seksama dan teliti lagi dalam menjalankan tugasnya
agar akla yang dihasilkannya tidak kehilangan keotentisitasannya.

ABSTRACT
Notary as public ofiicial, who receives licensing to notarize authentic dee4 is
liable for any action conducted during hiVtrer duty in deed preparations. A
document will lose its authenticity and will be considered as only a private deed
which signed by the parties to the deed is bound by the agreements within if there
is any negligence performed by the Notary when notarizing the document. The
undersigned parties reserve a right to claim for indemnlty if there are any
problems arise in the future and the parties are injured. The injured parties are
allowed to claim for indemnity on the damage caused. An example on breach of
law by a Notary during a deed preparation, is making copies of the deed which
has different contents with its original deed. The breach can be found in a study
case of breach by a Notary Y, in the Notary Central Supervisory Council Decree
No. 01/B/IvIj.PPN/Vl20l3 dated on 19 June 2013. Based on the case researche4 it
is found that in performing his/her duty, a Notary shall hold unto the Principle of
the Notary Duty Implementation, specifically on these principles: Diligence
Principle and Professionalism Principle, where a Notary is expected to be more
careful and thorough while performing hiVher duty to avoid a preparation of nonauthenticated
deed.;Notary as public ofiicial, who receives licensing to notarize authentic dee4 is
liable for any action conducted during hiVtrer duty in deed preparations. A
document will lose its authenticity and will be considered as only a private deed
which signed by the parties to the deed is bound by the agreements within if there
is any negligence performed by the Notary when notarizing the document. The
undersigned parties reserve a right to claim for indemnlty if there are any
problems arise in the future and the parties are injured. The injured parties are
allowed to claim for indemnity on the damage caused. An example on breach of
law by a Notary during a deed preparation, is making copies of the deed which
has different contents with its original deed. The breach can be found in a study
case of breach by a Notary Y, in the Notary Central Supervisory Council Decree
No. 01/B/IvIj.PPN/Vl20l3 dated on 19 June 2013. Based on the case researche4 it
is found that in performing his/her duty, a Notary shall hold unto the Principle of
the Notary Duty Implementation, specifically on these principles: Diligence
Principle and Professionalism Principle, where a Notary is expected to be more
careful and thorough while performing hiVher duty to avoid a preparation of nonauthenticated
deed., Notary as public ofiicial, who receives licensing to notarize authentic dee4 is
liable for any action conducted during hiVtrer duty in deed preparations. A
document will lose its authenticity and will be considered as only a private deed
which signed by the parties to the deed is bound by the agreements within if there
is any negligence performed by the Notary when notarizing the document. The
undersigned parties reserve a right to claim for indemnlty if there are any
problems arise in the future and the parties are injured. The injured parties are
allowed to claim for indemnity on the damage caused. An example on breach of
law by a Notary during a deed preparation, is making copies of the deed which
has different contents with its original deed. The breach can be found in a study
case of breach by a Notary Y, in the Notary Central Supervisory Council Decree
No. 01/B/IvIj.PPN/Vl20l3 dated on 19 June 2013. Based on the case researche4 it
is found that in performing his/her duty, a Notary shall hold unto the Principle of
the Notary Duty Implementation, specifically on these principles: Diligence
Principle and Professionalism Principle, where a Notary is expected to be more
careful and thorough while performing hiVher duty to avoid a preparation of nonauthenticated
deed.]

 File Digital: 1

Shelf
 T41617-Paramita Dian Irawati.pdf :: Unduh

LOGIN required

 Metadata

Jenis Koleksi : UI - Tesis Membership
No. Panggil : T41617
Entri utama-Nama orang :
Entri tambahan-Nama orang :
Entri tambahan-Nama badan :
Program Studi :
Subjek :
Penerbitan : Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014
Bahasa : ind
Sumber Pengatalogan : LibUI ind rda
Tipe Konten : text
Tipe Media : unmediated ; computer
Tipe Carrier : volume ; online resource
Deskripsi Fisik : x, 94 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix
Naskah Ringkas :
Lembaga Pemilik : Universitas Indonesia
Lokasi : Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
  • Ketersediaan
  • Ulasan
  • Sampul
No. Panggil No. Barkod Ketersediaan
T41617 15-17-304449173 TERSEDIA
Ulasan:
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20389175
Cover