[
ABSTRAKPenulisan tesis ini berangkat dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor
35/PUU-X/2012 terkait uji meteri beberapa pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 41
Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan karena dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuanketentuan
yang ada dalam UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Salah satu
putusan penting Mahkamah Konstitusi adalah mengubah Pasal 1 angka 6 dengan
menghapus kata ?negara? sehingga menjadi ?hutan adat adalah hutan yang berada
dalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat?. Dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
tersebut, status hutan adat dipulihkan kembali menjadi salah satu obyek hak ulayat
dalam wilayah masyarakat hukum adat. Dengan banyaknya pengakuan atau klaim
dari masyarakat hukum adat atas hutan adat, maka diperlukan analisis mengenai
pemulihan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor
35/PUU-X/2012, khususnya terkait kriteria kepemilikan hutan adat sebagai hak
ulayat dalam konsep negara kesatuan, status kepemilikan atas tanah dan izin pada
hutan adat serta mekanisme dan peran pemerintah dalam rangka pemulihan hutan
adat sebagai hak ulayat. Metodologi yang digunakan yaitu studi normatif dan empiris
dengan model deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa untuk
membuktikan kepemilikan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat
diperlukan penelitian terhadap keberlangsungan penguasaan dan penggunaan hutan
adat baik sebagai tempat tinggal maupun tempat memenuhi kebutuhan hidup seharihari
dan tidak hanya sekedar pengakuan atau klaim semata. Hasil penelitian tersebut
merupakan salah satu dasar pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat dan hak ulayatnya
oleh Pemerintah Daerah melalui Peraturan Daerah, dan selanjutnya menjadi rujukan
bagi Pemerintah Pusat untuk menetapkan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat masyarakat
hukum adat. Dengan penetapan hutan adat sebagai hak ulayat tidak ternyata
menghapus hak-hak pihak lain atas tanah maupun izin yang diperoleh sebelum
penetapan hutan adat. Kesimpulan penting dari hasil analisis yaitu penetapan hutan
adat sebagai hak ulayat harus sesuai prinsip-prinsip negara kesatuan dengan batasanbatasan
yang telah ditentukan baik dalam UU Kehutanan maupun UU tentang
Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria.
ABSTRACTThis thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number
35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 on
Forestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of the
Republic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, the
status of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction of
communal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims of
indigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recovery
of the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decision
number 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communal
rights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownership
and permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role of
government in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. The
methodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The results
of the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rights
of indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure and
forest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and not
just a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basic
recognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments through
local legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government to
establish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. The
determination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn?t remove
the rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment of
indigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of the
communal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of the
unitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation laws
on agrarian basis points.;This thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number
35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 on
Forestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of the
Republic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, the
status of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction of
communal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims of
indigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recovery
of the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decision
number 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communal
rights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownership
and permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role of
government in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. The
methodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The results
of the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rights
of indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure and
forest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and not
just a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basic
recognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments through
local legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government to
establish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. The
determination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn’t remove
the rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment of
indigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of the
communal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of the
unitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation laws
on agrarian basis points., This thesis departs from the decision of the Constitutional Court number
35/PUU-X/2012 related judicial test several articles in Law No. 41 of 1999 on
Forestry because it is contrary to the provisions contained in the Constitution of the
Republic of Indonesia in 1945. With the decision of the Constitutional Court, the
status of indigenous forests restored into one of the objects within the jurisdiction of
communal rights of indigenous peoples. With so many confessions or claims of
indigenous people on indigenous forests, it would require an analysis of the recovery
of the communal rights of indigenous forest after the Constitutional Court decision
number 35/PUU-X/2012, particularly related to the ownership criteria as communal
rights of indigenous forest in the concept of the unitary state, status of land ownership
and permissions on indigenous forests and the mechanisms and the role of
government in order to recovery the communal rights of indigenous forest. The
methodology used is normative study with qualitative descriptive models. The results
of the study showed that to prove ownership of indigenous forests as communal rights
of indigenous people needed research on the sustainability of communal tenure and
forest use either as a residence or a place to meet the needs of everyday life and not
just a mere acknowledgment or claim. The results of these studies is one of the basic
recognition of customary laws and communal rights by local governments through
local legislation, and subsequently became a reference for the central government to
establish communal rights of indigenous forest as indigenous peoples. The
determination of customary rights of indigenous forest as it turns out doesn’t remove
the rights of other to land and permission obtained before the establishment of
indigenous forests. Important conclusion from the analysis is the determination of the
communal rights of indigenous forest should be according to the principles of the
unitary state with the limits specified either in the forestry laws and regulation laws
on agrarian basis points.]
T41573-Agus Warsito.pdf :: Unduh