[
ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai permohonan PKPU atas diri PT. DRI yang
diajukan oleh Bank Mandiri selaku Kreditur pemegang hak jaminan pada saat
berlangsungnya proses gugatan sengketa nilai tukar dollar untuk pinjaman
investasi yang diberikan oleh Bank Mandiri. Proses PKPU kemudian berakhir
pada kepailitan kendati PT. DRI dapat membuktikan bahwa dirinya telah
melaksanakan kewajibannya kepada kreditur. Prosedural permohonan PKPU dan
Kepailitan dari PT. DRI dilakukan sesuai dengan Undang-undang Nomor 37
Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU namun terdapat kejanggalankejanggalan
dalam proses pelaksanaannya, salah satu kejanggalan tersebut adalah
pemblokiran rekening PT DRI oleh Pengurus sehingga PT DRI tidak dapat
mengakses rekening untuk kepentingan pembayaran seluruh biaya operasional
dan gaji pegawai. Hingga tahun 2013, PT DRI masih melakukan upaya hukum
terkait putusan pailit yang dijatuhkan kepada dirinya dan penjaminnya. Penelitian
menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Hasil
penelitian menyarankan perlu dibentuk suatu lembaga independen yang khusus
mengawasi proses PKPU dan kepailitan serta mengawasi kinerja Kurator,
mengingat bahwa Hakim Pengawas tidak sepenuhnya bekerja untuk mengawasi
proses PKPU dan Kepailitan; Peranan PPATK perlu diperluas sampai dengan
taraf dimana kasus-kasus yang terjadi sebelum PPATK didirikan dapat diperiksa;
Bank Indonesia perlu membuat sebuah badan internal yang berfungsi menerima
dan memeriksa laporan dari masyarakat terkait kerugian yang ditanggung oleh
masyarakat karena kelalaian bank; Perlu penambahan syarat keadaan insolvensi
dan jumlah minimum hutang untuk dapat mengajukan permohonan PKPU;
Perlunya diatur tugas dan wewenang Pengurus dan Kurator yang detail didalam
Undang-undang Kepailitan dan PKPU.
ABSTRACTThis thesis focus in suspension of obligation for payment of debt petition upon PT
DRI filed by Bank Mandiri as Preference Creditor-holder of security rights during
lawsuit of dollar exchange rate granted by Mandiri Bank itself. PKPU process
then ends in bankruptcy even though PT DRI carried out its obligations to
Creditors. PKPU application procedures and bankruptcy of PT. DRI carried out in
accordance with Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU but there are
irregularities in the implementation process, one of these irregularities is blocking
accounts by the Administrator so that PT DRI cannot access the account for the
benefit of the entire payment of operating costs and salaries. Until the year 2013,
PT DRI still take legal actions related to bankruptcy decision handed down to
itself and its guarantor. This research is using normative juridical methodology
and analytical descriptive. The research result to a suggestion where it is needed
to set up an independent body who oversees the process of suspension of
obligation for payment and bankruptcy also oversee the Receivers work
performance, given that the Supervisory Judge not fully work to oversee the
suspension of obligation for payment of debt and Bankruptcy. PPATK role needs
to be expanded to the extent to which the cases occurred before PPATK set out.
Bank Indonesia needs to make an internal body that serves to receive and
investigate reports of the public related losses which borne by society due to the
negligence of the bank; Need the addition of a state of insolvency requirement and
the minimum amount of debt to be able to apply for suspension of obligation for
payment of debt; The necessity of regulated duties and authority of Administrator
and Receivers which detailed in the Bankruptcy Act and suspension of obligation
for payment of debt.;This thesis focus in suspension of obligation for payment of debt petition upon PT
DRI filed by Bank Mandiri as Preference Creditor-holder of security rights during
lawsuit of dollar exchange rate granted by Mandiri Bank itself. PKPU process
then ends in bankruptcy even though PT DRI carried out its obligations to
Creditors. PKPU application procedures and bankruptcy of PT. DRI carried out in
accordance with Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU but there are
irregularities in the implementation process, one of these irregularities is blocking
accounts by the Administrator so that PT DRI cannot access the account for the
benefit of the entire payment of operating costs and salaries. Until the year 2013,
PT DRI still take legal actions related to bankruptcy decision handed down to
itself and its guarantor. This research is using normative juridical methodology
and analytical descriptive. The research result to a suggestion where it is needed
to set up an independent body who oversees the process of suspension of
obligation for payment and bankruptcy also oversee the Receivers work
performance, given that the Supervisory Judge not fully work to oversee the
suspension of obligation for payment of debt and Bankruptcy. PPATK role needs
to be expanded to the extent to which the cases occurred before PPATK set out.
Bank Indonesia needs to make an internal body that serves to receive and
investigate reports of the public related losses which borne by society due to the
negligence of the bank; Need the addition of a state of insolvency requirement and
the minimum amount of debt to be able to apply for suspension of obligation for
payment of debt; The necessity of regulated duties and authority of Administrator
and Receivers which detailed in the Bankruptcy Act and suspension of obligation
for payment of debt., This thesis focus in suspension of obligation for payment of debt petition upon PT
DRI filed by Bank Mandiri as Preference Creditor-holder of security rights during
lawsuit of dollar exchange rate granted by Mandiri Bank itself. PKPU process
then ends in bankruptcy even though PT DRI carried out its obligations to
Creditors. PKPU application procedures and bankruptcy of PT. DRI carried out in
accordance with Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU but there are
irregularities in the implementation process, one of these irregularities is blocking
accounts by the Administrator so that PT DRI cannot access the account for the
benefit of the entire payment of operating costs and salaries. Until the year 2013,
PT DRI still take legal actions related to bankruptcy decision handed down to
itself and its guarantor. This research is using normative juridical methodology
and analytical descriptive. The research result to a suggestion where it is needed
to set up an independent body who oversees the process of suspension of
obligation for payment and bankruptcy also oversee the Receivers work
performance, given that the Supervisory Judge not fully work to oversee the
suspension of obligation for payment of debt and Bankruptcy. PPATK role needs
to be expanded to the extent to which the cases occurred before PPATK set out.
Bank Indonesia needs to make an internal body that serves to receive and
investigate reports of the public related losses which borne by society due to the
negligence of the bank; Need the addition of a state of insolvency requirement and
the minimum amount of debt to be able to apply for suspension of obligation for
payment of debt; The necessity of regulated duties and authority of Administrator
and Receivers which detailed in the Bankruptcy Act and suspension of obligation
for payment of debt.]
T42192-Ruth Maria.pdf :: Unduh