[
ABSTRAKUpaya untuk merubah mekanisme dan persyaratan pembentukan daerah
otonom baru (DOB) melalui revisi UU Nomor 32 tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan
Daerah dapat dikategorikan sebagai proses reformulasi kebijakan. Penelitian
ini berusaha untuk menganalisis berbagai alternatif mekanisme baru yang
diusulkan pemerintah, DPR, dan DPD.
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif.
Yang menjadi obyek penelitian adalah sistem pembentukan DOB yang tertuang di
dalam draf revisi RUU Pemda, baik yang diusulkan pemerintah ke DPR pada
tahun 2012, maupun draf RUU Pemda versi DPD yang diajukan keDPR sejak
2011. Data dikumpulkan dengan wawancara mendalam untuk mendapatkan data
primer dan studi dokumentasi untuk memperoleh data sekunder. Adapun teknik
analisis data yang digunakan adalah model interaktif yang dimulai dengan reduksi
data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan.
Penelitian ini menemukan adanya tiga alternatif mekanisme pembentukan
DOB. Opsi pertama, daerah yang mengusulkan pembentukan DOB, apabila
memenuhi persyaratan teknis dan administratif, ditetapkan menjadi daerah
persiapan dengan peraturan pemerintah (PP). Setelah 3-5 tahun dievaluasi dan
dianggap layak, baru daerah persiapan itu disahkan menjadi DOB dengan UU.
Alternatif ini muncul dari pemerintah.
Opsi kedua, DPR dan pemerintah terlebih dulu menyepakati daerah mana
saja yang akan dimekarkan dengan membuat semacam list atau daftar dalam
desain besar penataan daerah (desartada). Selanjutnya, pemekaran dilakukan
dengan mengacu kepada desartada tersebut.
Opsi ketiga datang dari Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD). Intinya, semua
usulan pemekaran dinilai oleh Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Hasil penilaian itu
selanjutnya dibahas DPD untuk mendapatkan persetujuan. Bila disetujui DPD,
pemerintah menyusun RUU Pembentukannya untuk dibahas bersama DPR dan
DPD.
Berdasarkan analisis yang telah dilakukan, setidaknya ada empat aspek
yang harus diperbaiki dalam penyempurnaan mekanisme pemekaran agar DOB
berkembang optimal. Yaitu, mengoptimalkan peran dewan pertimbangan otonomi
daerah (DPOD), memperkuat fungsi pembinaan dan pengawasan pemerintah
pusat, memperketat persyaratan pembentukan DOB, serta mempertegas pelarangan
bagi pejabat kepala daerah untuk maju ke pilkada.
ABSTRACTThe effort to change the mecanism and requirements of the formation of
autonomous regions (DOB) through the revision of Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local
Government can be categorized as a reformulation of the policy process. This
research trying to analysis new mecanism alternative that proposed by government,
House of Representatives (DPR), and Regional Representative Council
(DPD).
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. Which is the object of
research is the establishment of a system DOB contained in the draft revision of
the government's proposed Local Government Bill to DPR in 2012 and the draft
revision of the DPD proposed Local Government Bill to Parliament since 2011.
Data collected by in-depth interviews to obtain primary data and
documentation study to obtain secondary data.The data analysis technique used is
interactive model that starts with data reduction, data display, and conclusion.
This study found that there are three alternative the mechanism of
formation new autonomous regions (DOB). The first option, which proposed the
establishment of regional DOB, if found to comply with the technical and
administrative requirements, set to be areas of preparation by government regulation
(PP). After 3-5 years were evaluated and deemed feasible, the preparation
of a new area with the DOB passed into law. This option arises from the government.
The second option, the Parliament and the government first agreed which
areas will be expanded to make some sort of list or lists in the design of structuring
large area (desartada). Furthermore, the division is done with reference to
the desartada.
The third option comes from the DPD. In essence, the proposed expansion
are assessed by the Ministry of the Interior. The assessment results are then
discussed DPD for approval. If approved by Council, the government drafting
Formation for further discussion with the DPR and DPD.
Based on the analysis that has been done, there are at least four aspects
that should be improved in the refinement of the expansion mechanism that DOB
develops optimally. Ie, optimizing the role of the consultative council of regional
autonomy (DPOD), strengthening the guidance and supervision functions of the
central government, tighten the requirements for the formation of new regions, as
well as reinforce attack for officials to advance to the regional head election of the
head of the area.;The effort to change the mecanism and requirements of the formation of
autonomous regions (DOB) through the revision of Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local
Government can be categorized as a reformulation of the policy process. This
research trying to analysis new mecanism alternative that proposed by government,
House of Representatives (DPR), and Regional Representative Council
(DPD).
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. Which is the object of
research is the establishment of a system DOB contained in the draft revision of
the government's proposed Local Government Bill to DPR in 2012 and the draft
revision of the DPD proposed Local Government Bill to Parliament since 2011.
Data collected by in-depth interviews to obtain primary data and
documentation study to obtain secondary data.The data analysis technique used is
interactive model that starts with data reduction, data display, and conclusion.
This study found that there are three alternative the mechanism of
formation new autonomous regions (DOB). The first option, which proposed the
establishment of regional DOB, if found to comply with the technical and
administrative requirements, set to be areas of preparation by government regulation
(PP). After 3-5 years were evaluated and deemed feasible, the preparation
of a new area with the DOB passed into law. This option arises from the government.
The second option, the Parliament and the government first agreed which
areas will be expanded to make some sort of list or lists in the design of structuring
large area (desartada). Furthermore, the division is done with reference to
the desartada.
The third option comes from the DPD. In essence, the proposed expansion
are assessed by the Ministry of the Interior. The assessment results are then
discussed DPD for approval. If approved by Council, the government drafting
Formation for further discussion with the DPR and DPD.
Based on the analysis that has been done, there are at least four aspects
that should be improved in the refinement of the expansion mechanism that DOB
develops optimally. Ie, optimizing the role of the consultative council of regional
autonomy (DPOD), strengthening the guidance and supervision functions of the
central government, tighten the requirements for the formation of new regions, as
well as reinforce attack for officials to advance to the regional head election of the
head of the area., The effort to change the mecanism and requirements of the formation of
autonomous regions (DOB) through the revision of Law No. 32 of 2004 on Local
Government can be categorized as a reformulation of the policy process. This
research trying to analysis new mecanism alternative that proposed by government,
House of Representatives (DPR), and Regional Representative Council
(DPD).
This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. Which is the object of
research is the establishment of a system DOB contained in the draft revision of
the government's proposed Local Government Bill to DPR in 2012 and the draft
revision of the DPD proposed Local Government Bill to Parliament since 2011.
Data collected by in-depth interviews to obtain primary data and
documentation study to obtain secondary data.The data analysis technique used is
interactive model that starts with data reduction, data display, and conclusion.
This study found that there are three alternative the mechanism of
formation new autonomous regions (DOB). The first option, which proposed the
establishment of regional DOB, if found to comply with the technical and
administrative requirements, set to be areas of preparation by government regulation
(PP). After 3-5 years were evaluated and deemed feasible, the preparation
of a new area with the DOB passed into law. This option arises from the government.
The second option, the Parliament and the government first agreed which
areas will be expanded to make some sort of list or lists in the design of structuring
large area (desartada). Furthermore, the division is done with reference to
the desartada.
The third option comes from the DPD. In essence, the proposed expansion
are assessed by the Ministry of the Interior. The assessment results are then
discussed DPD for approval. If approved by Council, the government drafting
Formation for further discussion with the DPR and DPD.
Based on the analysis that has been done, there are at least four aspects
that should be improved in the refinement of the expansion mechanism that DOB
develops optimally. Ie, optimizing the role of the consultative council of regional
autonomy (DPOD), strengthening the guidance and supervision functions of the
central government, tighten the requirements for the formation of new regions, as
well as reinforce attack for officials to advance to the regional head election of the
head of the area.]