[Konsep intervensi kemanusiaan merujuk kembali kepada great debate dalam
hubungan internasional antara idealisme dan realisme. Intervensi kemanusiaan
menjadi sebuah konsep yang ditawarkan oleh perspektif idealisme sebagai sebuah
tanggung jawab komunitas internasional untuk membantu pemenuhan hak hidup
setiap individu di negara yang tidak mampu menjalankan fungsi perlindungan
terhadap warga negaranya. Pelaksanaan intervensi yang melewati batasan
jurisdiksi dan otoritas pemerintah negara berdaulat bertentangan dengan prinsip
dasar kedaulatan dalam hubungan internasional. Pengaruh Great Powers dalam
pelaksanaan intervensi kemanusiaan juga menimbulkan kritik dari realisme yang
melihatnya sebagai sebuah politik kekuatan. Hal tersebut menarik perhatian
penulis untuk mengkaji lebih lanjut mengenai perdebatan-perdebatan yang
muncul dalam pembahasan mengenai intervensi kemanusiaan. Tulisan ini akan
memberikan pembahasan mengenai perdebatan intervensi kemanusiaan dalam
keterkaitannya dengan great debate dalam hubungan internasional, serta beberapa
alternatif pemikiran ideal terkait perdebatan tersebut.;The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in
international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained
humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international
community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International
community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not
fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background,
the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and
non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the
violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of
the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its
relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some
alternative perspectives around the debates.;The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in
international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained
humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international
community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International
community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not
fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background,
the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and
non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the
violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of
the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its
relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some
alternative perspectives around the debates., The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in
international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained
humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international
community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International
community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not
fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background,
the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and
non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the
violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of
the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its
relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some
alternative perspectives around the debates.]
TA-Caroline Widagdo.pdf :: Unduh