[Skripsi ini membahas mengenai analisis bentuk hukum persaingan usaha akibat
dugaan praktik diskriminasi oleh Chevron Indonesia Company dalam Tender
Export Pipeline Front End Engineering & Design (FEED) Contract. Penelitian
ini difokuskan dengan melakukan analisis yuridis terhadap Putusan PN Jakarta
Pusat No. 316/PDT.G/KPPU/2012/PN.JKT.PST. Penelitian ini menggunakan
metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang. Penulis
menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, maupun tersier, dengan
menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian menemukan bahwa PN
Jakarta Pusat telah tepat membatalkan Putusan KPPU No. 05/KPPU-I/2012.
karena KPPU telah keliru dalam mengimplementasikan Undang-Undang Nomor 5
Tahun 1999, khususnya terkait dengan pembuktian terhadap pelanggaran pasal 19
huruf d., This thesis discusses about the analysis of the legal form of competition as a result
of the alleged discriminatory practice by Chevron Indonesia Company in Tender
Export Pipeline Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) Contract. This
research has focused on the juridical analysis against the Central Jakarta District
Court’s Decision Number 316/PDT.G/KPPU/2013/PN.JKT.PST. This research
used normative legal research method with legislation approach. The author uses
primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using a qualitative approach. The
results shows that the Central Jakarta District Court was made the right decision
in cancelling the KPPU’s Decision Number 05/KPPU-I/2012 because the KPPU
had erred in implementing the Law Number 5 in 1999, especially in relation to
issue of evidence against violation of Article 19 letter d.]