[Skripsi ini membahas mengenai penerapan prinsip piercing the corporate veilpada konstruksi hukum holding company dan subsidiary company yang dilihatdari putusan-putusan pengadilan di Indonesia. Dalam hal-hal tertentu, holdingcompany dapat juga ditarik ikut bertanggung jawab melebihi saham yangdimilikinya atas gugatan pihak ketiga terhadap anak perusahaan dengan prinsippiercing the corporate veil. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, penulis mengajukan pokokpermasalahan, yaitu: 1. Bagaimana pengaturan mengenai doktrin piercing thecorporate veil terhadap holding company dan subsidiary company pada Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas?; 2. Bagaimanakah hubungan pertanggung jawabanantara holding company dan subsidiary company? Pada akhirnya, penulismemperoleh kesimpulan bahwa baik dalam gugatan maupun pertimbangan hakimdari kasus-kasus holding company d, The focus of this thesis is the implementation of piercing the corporate veilprincipal on holding company and subsidiary company legal framework as seenfrom judicial decisions in Indonesia that involve holding company and subsidiarycompany as the parties to the dispute. In several conditions, holding company canhave the liability beyond their shares on their subsidiary from third party’s claimwith piercing the corporate veil principal. Based on that problems, the writer triedto describe the main issues, which are: 1. How piercing the corporate veil doctrineof holding company and subsidiary company regulated on Indonesian CompanyLaw? 2. How liability between holding company and subsidiary companyrelated?. Eventually, the writer received the conclusion that either in claims orjudge considerations of holding company cases in Indonesia, the implementationof piercing the corporate veil principal still inconsistent.]