UI - Tesis Membership :: Kembali

UI - Tesis Membership :: Kembali

Studi komparatif : penerapan Per Se Illegal pada pembuktian kasus kartel di jepang dan korea = Comparative study the implementation of Per Se Illegal to prove existence of cartel case in japan and south korea

Rini Anjaswari; A. M. Tri Anggraeni, supervisor; Ratih Lestari, examiner; Inosentius Samsul, examiner ([Publisher not identified] , 2015)

 Abstrak

[ABSTRAK
Dari semua praktik bisnis yang tidak sehat, Kartel dipersepsikan sebagai bentuk
paling berbahaya dari tidakan persaingan usaha karena para pelakunya sepakat
melakukan konspirasi mengenai hal-hal yang bersifat sangat pokok dalam suatu
transaksi bisnis. Kartel akan menyebabkan kerugian bagi konsumen. Sifat
kerahasiaan kartel menjadi hambatan terbesar bagi otoritas persaingan usaha
untuk membuktikkan eksistensi kartel, Indonesia juga mengalami hal tersebut.
Untuk sejumlah alasan tersebut, beberapa negara di Barat menggunakan
pendekatan per se illegal. Per se illegal memiliki beberapa keunggulan
dibanding rule of reason dalam mengungkap keberadaan kartel. Tesis ini
membahas mengenai pengaturan penerapan pendekatan per se illegal dalam
Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) di Jepang dan The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) di Korea Selatan serta kemungkinan penerapan
pendekatan per se illegal dalam hukum persaingan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini
adalah penelitian yuridis normatif yang menggunakan metode pendekatan
perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian
menyarankan untuk menerapkan ketentuan mengenai pendekatan per se illegal
melalui amandemen Undang-undang Nomor 5 tahun 1999 sejalan dengan itu
menambahkan kewenangan KPPU terkait penggeledahan.

ABSTRACT
From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the most
dangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed the
conspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel would
cause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggest
obstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,
Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions have
adopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages compared
to a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the rule
on Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility application
Per Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative research
method which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. The
result suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach trough
amandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?s
authority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the most
dangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed the
conspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel would
cause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggest
obstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,
Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions have
adopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages compared
to a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the rule
on Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility application
Per Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative research
method which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. The
result suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach trough
amandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?s
authority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the most
dangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed the
conspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel would
cause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggest
obstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,
Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions have
adopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages compared
to a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the rule
on Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility application
Per Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative research
method which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. The
result suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach trough
amandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?s
authority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the most
dangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed the
conspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel would
cause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggest
obstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,
Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions have
adopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages compared
to a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the rule
on Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility application
Per Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative research
method which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. The
result suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach trough
amandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?s
authority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the most
dangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed the
conspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel would
cause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggest
obstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,
Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions have
adopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages compared
to a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the rule
on Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility application
Per Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative research
method which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. The
result suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach trough
amandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?s
authority related search and seizure., From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the most
dangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed the
conspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel would
cause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggest
obstacle for the Competition authority’s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,
Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions have
adopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages compared
to a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the rule
on Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies and
Fair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility application
Per Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative research
method which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. The
result suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach trough
amandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU’s
authority related search and seizure.]

 File Digital: 1

Shelf
 T42653-Rini Anjaswari.pdf :: Unduh

LOGIN required

 Metadata

Jenis Koleksi : UI - Tesis Membership
No. Panggil : T42653
Entri utama-Nama orang :
Entri tambahan-Nama orang :
Entri tambahan-Nama badan :
Program Studi :
Subjek :
Penerbitan : [Place of publication not identified]: [Publisher not identified], 2015
Bahasa : ind
Sumber Pengatalogan : LibUI ind rda
Tipe Konten : text
Tipe Media : unmediated ; computer
Tipe Carrier : volume ; online resource
Deskripsi Fisik : ix, 103 pages. : illustration. ; 28 cm. + appendix.
Naskah Ringkas :
Lembaga Pemilik : Universitas Indonesia
Lokasi : Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
  • Ketersediaan
  • Ulasan
  • Sampul
No. Panggil No. Barkod Ketersediaan
T42653 15-18-243798627 TERSEDIA
Ulasan:
Tidak ada ulasan pada koleksi ini: 20403583
Cover