[
ABSTRAKPerkawinan adalah ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dan seorang wanita dengan
tujuan untuk membentuk keluarga yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan keTuhanan
Yang Maha Esa. Penulis berasumsi bahwa salah satu tujuan perkawinan adalah untuk
mendapatkan keturunan atau anak. Dalam penelitian ini pokok permasalahan yang
penulis angkat adalah mengenai kedudukan anak luar kawin ditinjau dari Pasal 43
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan analisis terhadap
Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim. Penulis
menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pasal 43 Undang-Undang Nomor 1
tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan menyatakan bahwa anak luar kawin hanya memiliki
hubungan hukum dengan ibu dan keluarga ibunya. Tindakan hukum yang dapat
dilakukan anak luar kawin memiliki hubungan hukum dengan ayah dan keluarga
ayahnya adalah melalui pengakuan terhadap anak luar kawin dan pengesahan anak
luar kawin pada saat perkawinan kedua orangtuanya. Dalam Penetapan Pengadilan
Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim orang tua dari anak luar kawin tidak
melakukan pengesahan terhadap anak luar kawin mereka pada saat perkawinan,
sehingga meminta penetapan pengadilan negeri. Pengakuan dan Pengesahan Anak
yang telah melebihi jangka waktu yang telah ditetapkan Pasal 49 dan Pasal 50
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor
23 tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan harus melalui Penetapan
Pengadilan Negeri. Penulis setuju dengan pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam
Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor : 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim.
ABSTRACTMarriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a
happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one
of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on
the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974
concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number
55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.
Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child
only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be
done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?s
family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of
his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an
illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described
in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of
residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an
illegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time
of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has
exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24
year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration
of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal
considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a
happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one
of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on
the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974
concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number
55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.
Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child
only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be
done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?s
family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of
his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an
illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described
in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of
residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an
illegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time
of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has
exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24
year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration
of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal
considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.;Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a
happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one
of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on
the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974
concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number
55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.
Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child
only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be
done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father?s
family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of
his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an
illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described
in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of
residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an
illegitimate child?s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time
of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has
exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24
year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration
of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal
considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM., Marriage is born inner bond between a man and a woman with the aim to a form a
happy family and eternal based on one supreme divinity. The authors assume that one
of purposes of marriage is to obtain offspring or children. The issue that i use is on
the position of illegitimate child in view of Article 43 of Law Number 1 year 1974
concerning marriage and analysis to determination of district court number
55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM. The autor uses the methode of normative legal research.
Article 43 of Law number 1 year 1974 on marriage states that an illegitimate child
only has a legal relationship with mother and her family. Legal actions that can be
done to an illegitimate child has a legal relationship with his father and his father’s
family is throught the recognition and validation of an illegitimate child at the time of
his parents marriage. If parents of an illegitimate child negligent conduct agains an
illegitimate child endorsement, can be done in state court determination as described
in Article 32 paragraph 2 of Law number 26 year 2006 concerning administration of
residence. In determination of district court number: 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.Jkt.Tim an
illegitimate child’s parents do not approve of the marriage of their children at the time
of marriage, so requast a court warrant. Recognation and validation of child who has
exceeded a predetermined time period Article 49 and Article 50 of Law Number 24
year 2013 concerning changes to the Law number of 2006 concerning administration
of residence must go through a court warrant. Autors agrees with the legal
considerations in determination of district court number 55/Pdt.P/2014/PN.JKT.TIM.]