[
ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai perkawinan yang telah memenuhi rukun dan
syarat menurut hukum Islam tetapi belum dicatatkan di Kantor Urusan
Agama beserta akibat yang ditimbulkan dari perkawinan tersebut. Obyek
yang akan diteliti dalam tesis ini adalah Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor:
468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. Yang menjadi permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah
apakah jual beli yang dilakukan oleh seorang istri dalam ikatan perkawinan siri
harus mendapat persetujuan suaminya sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 92
Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Apakah Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan Nomor:
468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel sudah tepat bila ditinjau berdasarkan hukum Islam.
Metode Penelitian dalam Tesis ini menggunakan metode analisis-preskriptif
dengan menggunakan data sekunder yakni bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.
Pendekatan Hakim dalam memutus perkara ini menggunakan prespektif
berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan (2) Undang-undang nomor 1 Tahun
1974 tentang Perkawinan. Hakim berpendapat bahwa perkawinan tersebut
sah menurut hukum agama karena telah memenuhi rukun dan syaratsyaratnya
sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat 1, sehingga hakim
menganggap bahwa pencatatan yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat 2 tersebut
hanya merupakan syarat administratif saja, bukan merupakan syarat sah
perkawinan. Dengan demikian hakim menganggap bahwa ketentuan Pasal 2
ayat 1 dan 2 nya merupakan ketentuan sesuai yang berdiri sendiri. Dalam
hal perkawinan tidak memenuhi ketentuan sesuai yang diatur dalam Pasal 2
ayat 1 dan 2, maka berdasarkan hukum negara, perkawinan tersebut
dianggap tidak sah, karenanya negara tidak melindungi terhadap akibat
hukum yang timbul dari perkawinan tersebut. Sehingga jual beli yang
dilakukan oleh suami isteri yang terikat perkawinan siri tidak memerlukan
persetujuan dari salah satu pihak.
ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the marriage that have met the requirements and
conditions according to the islmaic law but not yet registered in the
registry office and its consequences. The object to be studied in this thesis
is a court verdict number 468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. the problem in this
thesis is whether the purchase is done by a wife in unregistered marriage
must be approved by her husband as provided for in Article 92
Compilation of Islamic Law. The court verdict number
468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel viewed by Islamic law. The research method in
this thesis-prescriptive analysis method using secondary data that primary
and secondary legal materials. Judge approach in deciding this case using a
perspective based on the provisions of Article 2 (1) and (2) of Act No.1
of 1974 about Marriage. The judge found that marriage is lawful religion
because it has met along and sets of requirements in accordance with the
provisions of Article 2, paragraph 1, so that the judge considers that the listing
set forth in Article 2, paragraph 2 is merely an administrative requirement, not a
condition of lawful marriage. Thus the judge considers that the provisions of
Article 2, paragraph 1 and 2 it is appropriate stand-alone provision. In the event
that the marriage does not meet the appropriate provisions set forth in Article 2,
paragraph 1 and 2, then by state law, marriage is considered invalid, and therefore
the state does not protect against legal consequences arising from the marriage. So
buying and selling is done by a husband and wife are bound marriage siri does not
require the consent of one party.;This thesis discusses the marriage that have met the requirements and
conditions according to the islmaic law but not yet registered in the
registry office and its consequences. The object to be studied in this thesis
is a court verdict number 468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. the problem in this
thesis is whether the purchase is done by a wife in unregistered marriage
must be approved by her husband as provided for in Article 92
Compilation of Islamic Law. The court verdict number
468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel viewed by Islamic law. The research method in
this thesis-prescriptive analysis method using secondary data that primary
and secondary legal materials. Judge approach in deciding this case using a
perspective based on the provisions of Article 2 (1) and (2) of Act No.1
of 1974 about Marriage. The judge found that marriage is lawful religion
because it has met along and sets of requirements in accordance with the
provisions of Article 2, paragraph 1, so that the judge considers that the listing
set forth in Article 2, paragraph 2 is merely an administrative requirement, not a
condition of lawful marriage. Thus the judge considers that the provisions of
Article 2, paragraph 1 and 2 it is appropriate stand-alone provision. In the event
that the marriage does not meet the appropriate provisions set forth in Article 2,
paragraph 1 and 2, then by state law, marriage is considered invalid, and therefore
the state does not protect against legal consequences arising from the marriage. So
buying and selling is done by a husband and wife are bound marriage siri does not
require the consent of one party., This thesis discusses the marriage that have met the requirements and
conditions according to the islmaic law but not yet registered in the
registry office and its consequences. The object to be studied in this thesis
is a court verdict number 468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. the problem in this
thesis is whether the purchase is done by a wife in unregistered marriage
must be approved by her husband as provided for in Article 92
Compilation of Islamic Law. The court verdict number
468/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel viewed by Islamic law. The research method in
this thesis-prescriptive analysis method using secondary data that primary
and secondary legal materials. Judge approach in deciding this case using a
perspective based on the provisions of Article 2 (1) and (2) of Act No.1
of 1974 about Marriage. The judge found that marriage is lawful religion
because it has met along and sets of requirements in accordance with the
provisions of Article 2, paragraph 1, so that the judge considers that the listing
set forth in Article 2, paragraph 2 is merely an administrative requirement, not a
condition of lawful marriage. Thus the judge considers that the provisions of
Article 2, paragraph 1 and 2 it is appropriate stand-alone provision. In the event
that the marriage does not meet the appropriate provisions set forth in Article 2,
paragraph 1 and 2, then by state law, marriage is considered invalid, and therefore
the state does not protect against legal consequences arising from the marriage. So
buying and selling is done by a husband and wife are bound marriage siri does not
require the consent of one party.]
T43029-Sinar Kurniandari.pdf :: Unduh