[
ABSTRAKPerubahan aturan single presence policy telah memberikan opsi baru bagi
pemerintah selaku pemegang saham pengendali bank BUMN dalam mematuhi
aturan kepemilikan tunggal tersebut. tujuan dari peneletian ini adalah untuk
meneliti perubahan peraturan single presence policy tersebut bagi bank BUMN di
Indonesia serta meneliti opsi terbaik bagi bank BUMN dalam melaksanakan
aturan single presence policy tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian
yuridis normatif.
Dari perubahan kebijakan single presence policy ini telah memberikan
opsi baru berupa fungsi holding menggantikan opsi divestasi saham pada aturan
single presence policy sebelumnya, dari perubahan tersebut, bank BUMN dalam
rangka melaksanakan kebijakan single presence policy tersebut, Opsi bank
holding company dinilai lebih baik mengingat fokus usaha dari bank-bank BUMN
yang berbeda.
Dalam mencapai efisiensi bank dan demi mematuhi aturan single presence
policy, maka Opsi terbaik bagi bank BUMN dari segi akibat hukum adalah bank
holding company dimana bank BUMN tidak perlu bergabung menjadi satu
perusahaan sehingga penerapan opsi tersebut sebaiknya dilaksanakan secepat
mungkin apalagi kita sedang dihadapkan dengan masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN
dimana perbankan yang kuat dan efisien sangat dibutuhkan.
ABSTRACTChange the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new option
for the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the sole
possession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes in
the rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia and
researching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the single
presence policy rules using normative juridical research.
change of single presence policy change has provided new options in the
form of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presence
policy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out the
policy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company options
considered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks are
different.
In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of the
single presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legal
consequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not need
to be merged into one company so that the application of these options should be
implemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic society
ASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed.;Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new option
for the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the sole
possession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes in
the rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia and
researching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the single
presence policy rules using normative juridical research.
change of single presence policy change has provided new options in the
form of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presence
policy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out the
policy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company options
considered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks are
different.
In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of the
single presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legal
consequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not need
to be merged into one company so that the application of these options should be
implemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic society
ASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed.;Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new option
for the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the sole
possession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes in
the rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia and
researching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the single
presence policy rules using normative juridical research.
change of single presence policy change has provided new options in the
form of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presence
policy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out the
policy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company options
considered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks are
different.
In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of the
single presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legal
consequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not need
to be merged into one company so that the application of these options should be
implemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic society
ASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed., Change the rules of the single presence policy has provided a new option
for the government as the controlling shareholder of state banks in the sole
possession abide by the rules. this research purpose is to examine the changes in
the rules of the single presence policy for state-owned banks in Indonesia and
researching the best options for state-owned banks in implementing the single
presence policy rules using normative juridical research.
change of single presence policy change has provided new options in the
form of a holding function replaces divestiture option on the single presence
policy rules previously, of the amendment, the state bank in order to carry out the
policy of the single presence policy, the bank holding company options
considered better considering the focus of business from state-owned banks are
different.
In achieving the efficiency of banks and to comply with the rules of the
single presence policy, then the best option for the state bank in terms of legal
consequences is a bank holding company in which state owned banks do not need
to be merged into one company so that the application of these options should be
implemented as soon as possible especially we are faced with economic society
ASEAN where a strong and efficient banking is needed.]