[
ABSTRAKPertumbuhan penduduk, pertumbuhan ekonomi dan urbanisasi di kota- kota besar
di negara berkembang seperti Jakarta menyebabkan timbulan/generasi sampah
semakin meningkat. Sementara itu kapasitas TPA semakin menurun. Untuk
mengatasi permasalahan tersebut diperlukan upaya pengurangan sampah sejak
dari sumbernya. TPS 3R dapat mengurangi volume sampah yang diangkut dan
dibuang ke TPA melalui pengomposan dan daur ulang pada skala kawasan.
Namun demikian TPS 3R sangat mengandalkan peran serta masyarakat dalam
bentuk retribusi sampah dan pemilahan sampah sejak dari sumbernya. Metode
Choice Modeling (CM) dan Contingent Valuation (CV) digunakan untuk
mengetahui WTP masyarakat atas beragam pilihan layanan sampah berbasis 3R.
CM digunakan untuk mengestimasi harga implisit tiap atribut layanan seperti
aroma TPS, pemilahan dan frekuensi pengumpulan sampah. Hasil CM
menunjukkan pemilahan sampah dari sumber masih merupakan beban bagi rumah
tangga sedangkan aroma TPS yang semakin tidak bau dan pemilahan sampah di
TPS menambah utilitas rumah tangga. Secara keseluruhan rumah tangga ternyata
memberikan penilaian yang cukup tinggi pada layanan manajemen sampah
berbasis 3R. Dengan membandingkan potensi pendapatan dengan biaya layanan
manajemen sampah tiap skenario, ditemukan bahwa tingkat cost recovery layanan
manajemen sampah ramah lingkungan/TPS 3R lebih tinggi dibandingkan layanan
konvensional. Dengan adanya tingkat cost recovery yang lebih tinggi dan
sejumlah eksternalitas positif yang dapat diperoleh, tidak ada alasan bagi pemda
untuk tidak mendukung layanan manajemen sampah berbasis 3R.
ABSTRACTPopulation,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countries
like Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhile
landfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reduce
waste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilities
based on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported and
disposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relies
on community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.
Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicit
consumers? willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CM
especially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as the
TPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicate
at-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing bad
odour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turned
out to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.
By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in each
scenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid waste
management service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher cost
recovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there is
no reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste management
service/TPS 3R.;Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countries
like Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhile
landfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reduce
waste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilities
based on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported and
disposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relies
on community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.
Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicit
consumers? willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CM
especially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as the
TPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicate
at-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing bad
odour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turned
out to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.
By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in each
scenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid waste
management service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher cost
recovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there is
no reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste management
service/TPS 3R.;Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countries
like Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhile
landfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reduce
waste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilities
based on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported and
disposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relies
on community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.
Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicit
consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CM
especially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as the
TPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicate
at-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing bad
odour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turned
out to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.
By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in each
scenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid waste
management service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher cost
recovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there is
no reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste management
service/TPS 3R., Population,economic growth and urbanization in big cities in developing countries
like Jakarta cause proliferating growth in solid waste generation. Meanwhile
landfill capacity is diminishing. To overcome this problem, efforts to reduce
waste from the source are needed. Solid waste intermediate treatment facilities
based on 3R principles (TPS 3R) can reduce waste which must be transported and
disposed through communal composting and recycling. However TPS 3R relies
on community participation in the form of waste retribution and at-source-wastesorting.
Choice Modelling (CM) and Contingent Valuation (CV) are used to elicit
consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for different service options. The CM
especially aims to estimate the implicit price for each service attribute such as the
TPS odour, at source waste sorting and collection frequency. CM results indicate
at-source-waste-sorting is still a burden for households while the diminishing bad
odour and waste sorting in TPS add household utilities. Overall household turned
out to give a fairly high valuation on 3R-based solid waste management services.
By comparing the potential service fee revenue with its operational cost in each
scenario, it was found that the cost recovery rate of ecological solid waste
management service/TPS 3R is higher than the conventional one. With higher cost
recovery rate and a number of positive externalities that can be obtained, there is
no reason for the government not to support 3R-based solid waste management
service/TPS 3R.]
T43008-siti fatimah .pdf :: Unduh