UI - Tesis Membership :: Back

UI - Tesis Membership :: Back

Perbedaan jumlah ekstrusi debri ke periapeks pada preparasi saluran akar dengan protaper dan protaper next (eksperimental laboratorik) = The difference in the amount of debris extrusion between protaper and protaper next instrumentation

Rininta Aprilia Kasdjono; Munyati Usman, supervisor; Bambang Nursasongko, supervisor; Narlan Sumawinata, examiner; Endang Suprastiwi, examiner; RA Nilakusuma Djauharie, examiner (Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia, 2014)

 Abstract

Latar Belakang: Selama preparasi kemomekanis, umumnya terjadi ekstrusi debri ke periapeks yang dapat memicu respon inflamasi dan memperlambat penyembuhan jaringan periapeks. ProTaper® dilaporkan menyebabkan banyak esktrusi debri, dan belum ada data mengenai ekstrusi debri oleh generasi barunya, ProTaper Next®
Tujuan: Menganalisis jumlah ekstrusi debri pada gigi yang dipreparasi dengan ProTaper® dan ProTaper Next®.
Metode: Enam puluh gigi premolar dibagi dalam dua kelompok (kelompok ProTaper® dan ProTaper Next®) sama besar. Ekstrusi debri pada preparasi ditampung dalam tabung, dan perbedaan berat tabung sebelum preparasi dan sesudah preparasi merupakan jumlah debri terekstrusi
Hasil: kelompok ProTaper® menghasilkan debri lebih banyak daripada kelompok ProTaper Next®. Secara statistik (t-test) perbedaanya bermakna (p<0,005).
Kesimpulan: jumlah debri pada preparasi dengan ProTaper Next® lebih sedikit daripada pada preparasi dengan ProTaper.

Background: debris extrusion during chemomechanical preparation could trigger inflammatory response and delay periapical healing. Instrumentation with ProTaper® is reported to cause significant debris extrusion, while no data available with ProTaper Next®.
Objective: to analyze the amount of debris extruded in instrumentation with ProTaper® and ProTaper Next®.
Methods: sixty premolars were divided evenly into two groups; the first group was instrumented with ProTaper® and the other one with ProTaper Next®. Debris ekstruded during instrumentation was collected in a bottle and the difference between the weight of the bottle before and after intrumentation was considered as the amount of debris extrusion.
Results: debris extrusion by instrumentation with ProTaper® was greater than instrumentation with ProTaper Next®, and statistically significant (t-test, p<0,005).
Conclusion: the amount of debris extrusion produced by ProTaper Next® was less than produced by ProTaper®

 Digital Files: 1

Shelf
 T-Rininta Aprilia Kasdjono.pdf :: Download

LOGIN required

 Metadata

Collection Type : UI - Tesis Membership
Call Number : T-Pdf
Main entry-Personal name :
Additional entry-Personal name :
Study Program :
Subject :
Publishing : Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia, 2014
Cataloguing Source LibUI ind rda
Content Type text
Media Type computer
Carrier Type online resource
Physical Description xv, 59 pages : illustration ; 28 cm + appendix
Concise Text
Holding Institution Universitas Indonesia
Location Perpustakaan UI, Lantai 3
  • Availability
  • Review
  • Cover
Call Number Barcode Number Availability
T-Pdf 15-17-027860113 TERSEDIA
Review:
No review available for this collection: 20403869
Cover