[Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Indonesia masih belum dapat lepas dari indikasi adanya
persekongkolan tender. Keberadaan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1999 tentang
Persaingan Usaha dan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) belum bisa
membuat berkurangnya kasus persekongkolan tender di Indonesia yang salah satunya
digunakan oleh penulis sebagai bahan skripsi ini. Pokok permasalahan dalam skripsi
ini adalah mengenai kewenangan dari karyawan Perseroan yang melakukan tindakan
atas nama Perseroan tanpa persetujuan dari Direksi dan mengenai pembatasan yang
terdapat dalam hukum persaingan usaha dalam hal pelaku usaha yang tidak
berkompetensi untuk mengikuti tender. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridisnormatif
dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan
kesalahan dari KPPU dalam memutus perkara tersebut.;Procurement of Goods / Services in Indonesia still can not be separated from the
indication of tender conspiracy. The existence of Law Act No. 5 of 1999 and the
Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) has not been able to make a
reduction in tender conspiracy case in Indonesia, one of which is used by the authors
as the material of this thesis. The main problem in this thesis is about the authority of
the employees of the Company who act on behalf of the Company without the
approval of the Board of Directors and the restrictions contained in competition law
in the case of businesses that are not competent to participate in the tender. This
research is a normative legal research using secondary data. The Results from this
study indicate the fault of the Commission in deciding the case., Procurement of Goods / Services in Indonesia still can not be separated from the
indication of tender conspiracy. The existence of Law Act No. 5 of 1999 and the
Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) has not been able to make a
reduction in tender conspiracy case in Indonesia, one of which is used by the authors
as the material of this thesis. The main problem in this thesis is about the authority of
the employees of the Company who act on behalf of the Company without the
approval of the Board of Directors and the restrictions contained in competition law
in the case of businesses that are not competent to participate in the tender. This
research is a normative legal research using secondary data. The Results from this
study indicate the fault of the Commission in deciding the case.]