[
ABSTRAKPengembangan lapangan gas laut dalam memiliki tantangan teknis, terkait fasilitas
produksi dan teknologi untuk dapat memproduksikan migas pada kondisi
lingkungan yang ekstrem. Disamping itu, biaya yang diperlukan lebih besar
dibandingkan pengembangan lapangan laut dangkal. Dalam penelitian ini
dilakukan analisa secara teknis dan ekonomis terhadap pengembangan lapangan
gas laut dalam di Selat Makasar dengan metode subsea tieback, dengan
memanfaatkan kapasitas tersedia dari floating production unit (FPU) yang sudah
ada. Analisa teknis meliputi penentuan ukuran pipa (flowline) optimal, yang dapat
memenuhi target deliverabilitas gas, memenuhi kriteria teknis lainnya, serta
analisa flow assurance, khususnya mitigasi hidrat untuk menjamin
keberlangsungan aliran fluida dari sumur bawah laut hingga ke titik jual. Dari
analisa teknis akan didapatkan beberapa konfigurasi ukuran pipa dan mitigasi
hidrat. Analisa ekonomi meliputi perhitungan biaya investasi untuk setiap opsi
yang memenuhi kriteria teknis, kemudian dilanjutkan penghitungan parameter
keekonomian berdasarkan aturan Production Sharing Contract (PSC) yang
berlaku di Indonesia. Dengan harga gas 6 US$/mmbtu, didapatkan nilai
Government Take (GT) 609 juta US$ dan Internal rate of Return (IRR) 15.13%.
Sensitivitas analisis dilakukan dengan variasi harga jual gas dan mengubah
besaran kontraktor split untuk meningkatkan IRR sehingga dapat mencapai nilai
yang masih dapat diterima dari sisi Kontraktor. Untuk mendapatkan IRR yang
lebih besar dari 20%, diperlukan kontraktor split sebesar 48%. Hasil analisa
keekonomian dapat menjadi pertimbangan dalam penentuan besaran kontraktor
split untuk pengembangan lapangan gas laut dalam.
ABSTRACTDeepwater gas field development has technical challenges, related to production
facilities and technology that can be used for producing oil and gas in the extreme
ambient conditions. The required cost is also higher than shallow water. This
research analyzed technical and economical aspect of deepwater gas field
development at Makasar Strait using subsea tieback method, which utilize the
available capacity from existing Floating Production Unit (FPU). Technical
analysis include selection the optimum flowline size, which meet the gas
deliverability and other criteria as well. It also cover the flow assurance analysis,
particularly hydrate mitigation, to ensure the flow continuity of oil and gas from
subsea well to the sales point. Economic analysis include the calculation of
investment cost on each option that meet the technical criteria above. Then
continued with calculation of economic parameter based on applicable Indonesia
Production Sharing Contract (PSC) scheme. With gas price of 6 US$/mmbtu, will
give Government Take (GT) of 609 million US$ and Internal rate of Return
(IRR) 15.13%. Sensitivity analysis has been done by varrying the gas sale price
and changing the percentage of contractor split to increase the IRR to meet the
value that still acceptable from Contractor side. Contractor split of 48% is
required to achieve IRR higher than 20%. This economic analysis result could
become a consideration in defining the percentage of Contractor Split for
deepwater gas development.;Deepwater gas field development has technical challenges, related to production
facilities and technology that can be used for producing oil and gas in the extreme
ambient conditions. The required cost is also higher than shallow water. This
research analyzed technical and economical aspect of deepwater gas field
development at Makasar Strait using subsea tieback method, which utilize the
available capacity from existing Floating Production Unit (FPU). Technical
analysis include selection the optimum flowline size, which meet the gas
deliverability and other criteria as well. It also cover the flow assurance analysis,
particularly hydrate mitigation, to ensure the flow continuity of oil and gas from
subsea well to the sales point. Economic analysis include the calculation of
investment cost on each option that meet the technical criteria above. Then
continued with calculation of economic parameter based on applicable Indonesia
Production Sharing Contract (PSC) scheme. With gas price of 6 US$/mmbtu, will
give Government Take (GT) of 609 million US$ and Internal rate of Return
(IRR) 15.13%. Sensitivity analysis has been done by varrying the gas sale price
and changing the percentage of contractor split to increase the IRR to meet the
value that still acceptable from Contractor side. Contractor split of 48% is
required to achieve IRR higher than 20%. This economic analysis result could
become a consideration in defining the percentage of Contractor Split for
deepwater gas development., Deepwater gas field development has technical challenges, related to production
facilities and technology that can be used for producing oil and gas in the extreme
ambient conditions. The required cost is also higher than shallow water. This
research analyzed technical and economical aspect of deepwater gas field
development at Makasar Strait using subsea tieback method, which utilize the
available capacity from existing Floating Production Unit (FPU). Technical
analysis include selection the optimum flowline size, which meet the gas
deliverability and other criteria as well. It also cover the flow assurance analysis,
particularly hydrate mitigation, to ensure the flow continuity of oil and gas from
subsea well to the sales point. Economic analysis include the calculation of
investment cost on each option that meet the technical criteria above. Then
continued with calculation of economic parameter based on applicable Indonesia
Production Sharing Contract (PSC) scheme. With gas price of 6 US$/mmbtu, will
give Government Take (GT) of 609 million US$ and Internal rate of Return
(IRR) 15.13%. Sensitivity analysis has been done by varrying the gas sale price
and changing the percentage of contractor split to increase the IRR to meet the
value that still acceptable from Contractor side. Contractor split of 48% is
required to achieve IRR higher than 20%. This economic analysis result could
become a consideration in defining the percentage of Contractor Split for
deepwater gas development.]