[
ABSTRAKPenelitian ini ingin mencari tahu faktor apa yang membuat seorang pemilih
memutuskan untuk memilih satu kandidat dan tidak memilih kandidat lainnya.
Penelitian ini membahas pengaruh faktor sosiologis (agama, suku, jenis kelamin,
keluarga dan peer group), faktor psikososial (orientasi isu, orientasi kandidat,
identifikasi partai politik), pilihan rasional (prospectives voting, retrospectives
voting) dan vote buying terhadap preferensi pemilih. Penelitian ini juga membahas
faktor yang dominan di antara faktor-faktor tersebut dalam mempengaruhi
preferensi pemilih. Dengan melakukan metode kuantitatif laboratory
experimental, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa ada empat faktor dominan yang
sangat mempengaruhi preferensi pemilih, yaitu: orientasi isu, orientasi kandidat,
agama dan vote buying. Sehingga, dapat diinterpretasikan bahwa pemilih lebih
rasional namun terjebak dalam pragmatisme politik yang muncul sebagai dampak
dari kekecewaan dan rasa frustasi terhadap kinerja para elit politik.
ABSTRACTThis study examines why voters voted the way they did: what factors make a
voter decides to choose one candidate over the others. This study analyzes the
influence of sociological factors (religion, ethnicity, gender, family and peer
group), psychosocial factors (issues orientation, candidates orientation, party
identification), rational preferences factors (prospectives voting, retrospectives
voting) and vote buying on voter preference. The study also determines the most
dominant factor among these factors in influencing voter preference. Using
quantitative laboratory experimental method, results show that there are four
dominant factors that influence voter preference: issue orientation, candidate
orientation, religion and vote buying. Thus, it can be interpretated that voters are
more rational, but they are currently being trapped in a political pragmatism
resulted from desperation and frustration toward political leaders’ performance, This study examines why voters voted the way they did: what factors make a
voter decides to choose one candidate over the others. This study analyzes the
influence of sociological factors (religion, ethnicity, gender, family and peer
group), psychosocial factors (issues orientation, candidates orientation, party
identification), rational preferences factors (prospectives voting, retrospectives
voting) and vote buying on voter preference. The study also determines the most
dominant factor among these factors in influencing voter preference. Using
quantitative laboratory experimental method, results show that there are four
dominant factors that influence voter preference: issue orientation, candidate
orientation, religion and vote buying. Thus, it can be interpretated that voters are
more rational, but they are currently being trapped in a political pragmatism
resulted from desperation and frustration toward political leaders’ performance]