[Tesis ini membahas mengenai “Analisa Hukum Perjanjian Perdamaian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Jual Beli Obyek Hak Atas Tanah“. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan metode yuridis normatif yaitu dengan melihat bagaimana bentuk perjanjian perdamaian pada penyelesaian sengketa perdata dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Perdamaian sebagai salah satu bentuk perjanjian, Pasal 1851KUHPerdata mengatur definisi perdamaian “suatu perjanjian dengan mana kedua belah pihak, dengan menyerahkan, menjanjikan atau menahan suatu barang, mengakhiri suatu perkara yang sedang bergantung atau pun mencegah timbulnya suatu perkara“. Dimasukannya prosedur perdamaian ke dalam sistem peradilandidasarkan pada Pasal 130 HIR/154 Rbg dimana dijelaskan hakim wajibmenganjurkan para pihak yang berperkara untuk menempuh prosedur perdamaian terlebih dahulu. Perjanjian perdamaian sah jika dibuat secara tertulis. Perjanjian perdamaian yang ditetapkan dalam suatu formalitas atau bentuk cara tertentu, dinamakan perjanjian formil. Dalam perjanjian formil kesepakatan atau perjanjian lisan semata-mata antara para pihak yang berjanji belum melahirkan kewajiban pada pihak yang berjanji untuk menyerahkan sesuatu, melakukan atau berbuatsesuatu atau tidak melakukan dan tidak berbuat sesuatu. Apabila salah satu pihak wanprestasi maka pihak yang dirugikan dapat menempuh prosedur eksekusi;This thesis discusses “Legal Analysis on Peace Agreement for Dispute Resolution of Land Right Object Sale and Purchase“. This is a descriptive study that uses juridical normative method, which sees what form does the Peace Agreement for civil dispute settlement in Indonesia’s justice system take. Peace as a form of agreement, on act 1851 of Civil Code, mentioned that the definition of peace agreement is “an agreement, with which both party, by giving, pledging or holding an object, ending a dispute that haven’t been solved or even prevent a dispute“. The inclusion of peace procedure in justice system is based on act 130 of HIR/154 Rbg whereas elaborated that a judge is required to advise the disputing parties to go through peace procedure first. Peace Agreement is valid if made in writing. Peace Agreement which set in a specific formal way is called a formalagreement. In a formal treaty or oral agreement solely between the parties have yet bore any liability on the pledging party, be it to give, do, commit or not to do something. If one of the parties is negligent, the other party, which is aggrieved, said party can take execution procedures., This thesis discusses “Legal Analysis on Peace Agreement for Dispute Resolutionof Land Right Object Sale and Purchase“. This is a descriptive study that usesjuridical normative method, which sees what form does the Peace Agreement forcivil dispute settlement in Indonesia’s justice system take. Peace as a form ofagreement, on act 1851 of Civil Code, mentioned that the definition of peaceagreement is “an agreement, with which both party, by giving, pledging orholding an object, ending a dispute that haven’t been solved or even prevent adispute“. The inclusion of peace procedure in justice system is based on act 130 ofHIR/154 Rbg whereas elaborated that a judge is required to advise the disputingparties to go through peace procedure first. Peace Agreement is valid if made inwriting. Peace Agreement which set in a specific formal way is called a formalagreement. In a formal treaty or oral agreement solely between the parties haveyet bore any liability on the pledging party, be it to give, do, commit or not to dosomething. If one of the parties is negligent, the other party, which is aggrieved,said party can take execution procedures.]