[ABSTRAK
Dalam kinerja pemerintahan saat ini menghadapi “tekanan” dari berbagai pihak untukmeningkatkan pelayanan publik dan meningkatkan partisipasi aktif dalam pemberianinformasi bagi masyarakat serta dituntut lebih efektif. Hal itu menyebabkan e-Government atau pemerintahan berbasis elektronik semakin berperan penting bagisemua pengambil keputusan. Salah satunya keputusan dalam hal pengesahan badanhukum Yayasan. Tesis ini akan menganalisis keabsahan Surat Keputusan yangdikeluarkan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia dan bagaimana tanggung jawabNotaris apabila terjadi kesalahan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridisnormatif atau penelitian hukum kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ialah bahwa agartercapainya tujuan pelayanan publik yang cepat, aman, dan efisien maka dalam prosespenerbitan Surat Keputusan terhadap pengesahan badan hukum tidak dilakukanpemeriksaan kesesuaian dokumen sehingga memberikan tanggung jawab sepenuhnyakepada Notaris sehingga menyebabkan keraguan pada keabsahan Surat Keputusantersebut yang seharusnya menjadi tanggung jawab Menteri Hukum dan Hak AsasiManusia dan pengamanan untuk menjaga keautentikan dalam Surat Keputusan tidakcukup hanya menggunakan sistem QR Code tetapi juga dengan tanda tangan digitaldengan digital certificate.

---

ABSTRACT
In the performance of the current government faces pressure from various parties toimprove public services and increase active participation in providing information tothe public and prosecuted more effectively. It causes e-Government or electronicbasedgovernment increasingly important role for all decision makers. One of them isa decision in the case ratification foundation. this thesis will analyze the valdity bythe Minister of Law and Human Rights and how reponsibility of the notary in thecase of errors. Method of research is normative juridicial or legal researchliterature. The results of the study is that in order to achieve the goal of publicservice that is fast, secure, and efficient then in the process of issuing a decision onthe ratification of legal entities not assessment of conformity document giving fullresponsibility to the notary causing doubt on the validity of the decree that should bethe responsibilty of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and safeguards topreserve the authenticity of the decree is not enough just to use QR Code system butalso with digital signatures with digital certificate., In the performance of the current government faces pressure from various parties toimprove public services and increase active participation in providing information tothe public and prosecuted more effectively. It causes e-Government or electronicbasedgovernment increasingly important role for all decision makers. One of them isa decision in the case ratification foundation. this thesis will analyze the valdity bythe Minister of Law and Human Rights and how reponsibility of the notary in thecase of errors. Method of research is normative juridicial or legal researchliterature. The results of the study is that in order to achieve the goal of publicservice that is fast, secure, and efficient then in the process of issuing a decision onthe ratification of legal entities not assessment of conformity document giving fullresponsibility to the notary causing doubt on the validity of the decree that should bethe responsibilty of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and safeguards topreserve the authenticity of the decree is not enough just to use QR Code system butalso with digital signatures with digital certificate.]