[
ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas tentang unsur-unsur penting yang terdapat dalam
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) dan Special Court
for Sierra Leone (SCSL) serta tanggung jawab pidana individu yang dapat
diterapkan dalam hybrid tribunals. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif
analitis. Penulis menganalisa perbandingan antara ECCC dan SCSL sebagai
hybrid tribunal dan dari hasil analisa tersebut ditemukan beberapa persamaan dan
perbedaan dari kedua hybrid tribunal tersebut. Adapun persamaan diantara
keduanya meliputi unsur-unsur yang digunakan dalam peradilan, antara lain
instrumen hukum yang digunakan, komposisi hakim, jaksa dan pengacara. Selain
itu juga, latar belakang berdirinya kedua hybrid tribunal tersebut memiliki
kesamaan. Latar belakang tersebut antara lain tidak memadainya sumber daya di
tingkat nasional, adanya hambatan dari sistem hukum domestik, tidak
memadainya sistem hukum domestik dan ingin memberikan kontribusi terhadap
hak, keadilan dan pengadilan yang efektif.
ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the important elements contained in the Extraordinary
Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) and the Special Court for Sierra
Leone (SCSL) and also the criminal responsibility of individuals that can be
applied in hybrid tribunals. This research uses descriptive analytical method. The
author analyzes the comparison between the ECCC and SCSL as a hybrid tribunal
and as the results of the analysis, the author found some similarities and
differences of the two hybrid tribunal. The similarities between the two covering
elements used in court, among other legal instruments are used, the composition
of judges, prosecutors and lawyers. Also, the background of the establishment of
the two hybrid tribunals have in common. These background include inadequate
resources at the national level, the barriers of the domestic legal system,
inadequate domestic legal system and the tribunal wishes to contribute to the
rights, justice and effective court, This thesis discusses the important elements contained in the Extraordinary
Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) and the Special Court for Sierra
Leone (SCSL) and also the criminal responsibility of individuals that can be
applied in hybrid tribunals. This research uses descriptive analytical method. The
author analyzes the comparison between the ECCC and SCSL as a hybrid tribunal
and as the results of the analysis, the author found some similarities and
differences of the two hybrid tribunal. The similarities between the two covering
elements used in court, among other legal instruments are used, the composition
of judges, prosecutors and lawyers. Also, the background of the establishment of
the two hybrid tribunals have in common. These background include inadequate
resources at the national level, the barriers of the domestic legal system,
inadequate domestic legal system and the tribunal wishes to contribute to the
rights, justice and effective court]
T44280-Triadi Adhakusuma.pdf :: Unduh