[ABSTRAK
Panji Angreni merupakan karya sastra yang disalin pada tahun Jawa 1723 atau1795 dari suatu teks abad ke-17 yang?sayang?tidak diketahui teks induknya,pada masa ?budaya lisan kedua?. Teks dibingkai dengan sekar macapat, terdiriatas 48 pupuh ?bab? dan meliputi 1.983 pada ?bait?. Jarak budaya menimbulkanpertanyaan: bagaimana ?cara membaca? PA bagi pembaca masa kini. Dalam halini ?cara membaca? merujuk pada pemaknaan, karena bagaimanapun maknasastra lama dapat dipahami jika ada keakraban antara pembaca dan konvensi padazamannya. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa PA, sebagai teks tulis, menujukkan ciricirikelisanan melalui formula/formulaik. Keberpautan antara kelisanan dankeberaksaraan ditunjukkan oleh macapat sebagai bingkai teks: membaca teks yangdibingkai macapat harus dinyanyikan karena aturan formal pembaitan macapatsekaligus bertautan dengan tata susun nada. Pembacaan teks dengan caraditembangkan seturut tata susun nada akan menghasilkan makna secara padu?baik tekstual maupun keindahan: kisahan, leksikal, tematik dan bunyi (segmentalsuprasegmental-musikal). Membaca PA seyogianya juga memahami pakeliran?pergelaran wayang? kerena adanya tapak-tapak pakeliran pada PA.;

---

ABSTRACT
Panji Angreni is a literature work which was copied in the Javanese year of 1723or 1795 AD from 17th century text in the era of ?secondary oral culture? that?unfortunately?was not known for its first hand manuscript. The text of PanjiAngreni is framed by macapat?s songs that consist of 48 cantos ?chapters? andcover 1,983 couplets ?stanzas?. A cultural distance raises a questions on ?how ?toread? Panji Angreni to current readers?? The ?how to read? phrase refers to themeaning, because an old literature meaning can be understood if there is afamiliarity between a reader and conventions text era. Analysis showed that PanjiAngreni, as written text, has literacy characteristic through formula/formulaic. Aninterlocking between orality and literacy is shown by macapat as atext frame;wheres reading a text that is framed by macapat should be sung because formalrules in macapat?s stanzas are engaged to tone row order. Reading the text bysinging it in accordance to tone row order will result in coherent meaning, bothtextual an beauty meaning, particulary in narratives, lexical, thematic and sound(segmental-suprasegmantal-musical). Moreover, those who reading Panji Angrenishould also understand pakeliran ?leather puppet performance story? because thereare many tracs of pakeliran in Panji Angreni.;Panji Angreni is a literature work which was copied in the Javanese year of 1723or 1795 AD from 17th century text in the era of ?secondary oral culture? that?unfortunately?was not known for its first hand manuscript. The text of PanjiAngreni is framed by macapat?s songs that consist of 48 cantos ?chapters? andcover 1,983 couplets ?stanzas?. A cultural distance raises a questions on ?how ?toread? Panji Angreni to current readers?? The ?how to read? phrase refers to themeaning, because an old literature meaning can be understood if there is afamiliarity between a reader and conventions text era. Analysis showed that PanjiAngreni, as written text, has literacy characteristic through formula/formulaic. Aninterlocking between orality and literacy is shown by macapat as atext frame;wheres reading a text that is framed by macapat should be sung because formalrules in macapat?s stanzas are engaged to tone row order. Reading the text bysinging it in accordance to tone row order will result in coherent meaning, bothtextual an beauty meaning, particulary in narratives, lexical, thematic and sound(segmental-suprasegmantal-musical). Moreover, those who reading Panji Angrenishould also understand pakeliran ?leather puppet performance story? because thereare many tracs of pakeliran in Panji Angreni., Panji Angreni is a literature work which was copied in the Javanese year of 1723or 1795 AD from 17th century text in the era of “secondary oral culture” that—unfortunately—was not known for its first hand manuscript. The text of PanjiAngreni is framed by macapat’s songs that consist of 48 cantos ‘chapters’ andcover 1,983 couplets ‘stanzas’. A cultural distance raises a questions on ‘how “toread” Panji Angreni to current readers?’ The “how to read” phrase refers to themeaning, because an old literature meaning can be understood if there is afamiliarity between a reader and conventions text era. Analysis showed that PanjiAngreni, as written text, has literacy characteristic through formula/formulaic. Aninterlocking between orality and literacy is shown by macapat as atext frame;wheres reading a text that is framed by macapat should be sung because formalrules in macapat’s stanzas are engaged to tone row order. Reading the text bysinging it in accordance to tone row order will result in coherent meaning, bothtextual an beauty meaning, particulary in narratives, lexical, thematic and sound(segmental-suprasegmantal-musical). Moreover, those who reading Panji Angrenishould also understand pakeliran ‘leather puppet performance story’ because thereare many tracs of pakeliran in Panji Angreni.]