[ABSTRAK
Latar belakang: Salah satu bagian dalam menentukan diagnosis dan rencana perawatan ortodonti adalah analisis profil jaringan lunak pasien. E-line & Profil wajah merupakan metode yang dapat dipakai dalam menentukan profil jaringan lunak. Pengukuran E-line dan Profil Wajah dinyatakan dapat dilakukan antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral. Tujuan: Mengetahui perbedaan posisi Ls, Li dari E-line dan Profil Wajah pada Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral. Metode Penelitian: Didapatkan 55 sampel penelitian berupa Sefalogram lateral dan foto Ekstra Oral lateral. Dilakukan tabulasi data dan diuji komparatif sederhana dengan Chi-square untuk membandingkan posisi Ls, Li dari E-line dan Profil Wajah pada sefalogram dan foto ekstra oral. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna untuk posisi Ls terhadap garis E-line antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral (p< 0,05), terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna untuk posisi Li terhadap garis E-line antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral (p<0,05). Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna untuk Profil Wajah antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral (p<0,05). Kesimpulan: Posisi Ls, Li dari E-line dan Profil Wajah pada Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral adalah berbeda.ABSTRACT
Background: Factors in determining the diagnosis and orthodontic treatment plan is the analysis of soft tissue profile of the patient. E-line measurement and profile can be done in the face of otherwise sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Purpose: To determine differences in position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Methods: There were 55 samples of research in the form of sefalogram lateral and lateral extra-oral photos. Conducted a comparative tabulation of the data and then tested with Chi-square to compare the position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Results: There were significant differences Ls position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05), there were significant differences Li position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05 ), there were significant differences in the facial profile and photo sefalogram extra-oral (p <0.05). Conclusion: The position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photograph is different.;Background: Factors in determining the diagnosis and orthodontic treatment plan is the analysis of soft tissue profile of the patient. E-line measurement and profile can be done in the face of otherwise sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Purpose: To determine differences in position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Methods: There were 55 samples of research in the form of sefalogram lateral and lateral extra-oral photos. Conducted a comparative tabulation of the data and then tested with Chi-square to compare the position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Results: There were significant differences Ls position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05), there were significant differences Li position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05 ), there were significant differences in the facial profile and photo sefalogram extra-oral (p <0.05). Conclusion: The position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photograph is different., Background: Factors in determining the diagnosis and orthodontic treatment plan is the analysis of soft tissue profile of the patient. E-line measurement and profile can be done in the face of otherwise sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Purpose: To determine differences in position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Methods: There were 55 samples of research in the form of sefalogram lateral and lateral extra-oral photos. Conducted a comparative tabulation of the data and then tested with Chi-square to compare the position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Results: There were significant differences Ls position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05), there were significant differences Li position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05 ), there were significant differences in the facial profile and photo sefalogram extra-oral (p <0.05). Conclusion: The position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photograph is different.]