[ABSTRAK
Jakarta adalah kota terbesar di Indonesia. Sebagai kota terbesar di Indonesia, Jakartajuga memiliki populasi yang sangat besar, yang diimbangi oleh majunya ekonomiJakarta. Sebagai imbas populasi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi, permasalahanpengelolaan limbah padat adalah salah satu permasalahan dasar kota Jakarta.Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis keberlanjutan pengelolaan limbahpadat di Jakarta dengan mengukur ekoefisiensinya, serta menganalisis keberlanjutanmetode hydrocracking sebagai cara pengolahan limbah padat perkotaan, khususnya diJakarta. Pada sistem pengelolaan terkini, ditemukan bahwa pengelolaan limbah padatdi Jakarta tidak berlanjut (Ekoefisiensi pada tahun 2013, sebesar 0,52 lebih kecil dari1). Oleh sebab itu diperlukan intervensi berupa proses hydrocracking (Ekoefisiensiproses sebesar 1,775) agar pengelolaan limbah padat di Jakarta berlanjut. Skenariointervensi hydrocracking baru akan berlanjut apabila limbah padat di Jakarta telahdipilah sebesar 50% dan limbah padat organik diproses melalui hydrocrackingsebesar 30%.

---

ABSTRACT

Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has a

major economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid waste

management issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability of

existing municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze the

sustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid waste

treatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta?s municipal solid waste

management system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at

0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessary

to do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form of

hydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainable

process (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, the

intervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted,

and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction;Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has a

major economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid waste

management issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability of

existing municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze the

sustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid waste

treatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta?s municipal solid waste

management system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at

0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessary

to do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form of

hydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainable

process (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, the

intervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted,

and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction, Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has a

major economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid waste

management issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability of

existing municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze the

sustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid waste

treatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta’s municipal solid waste

management system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at

0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessary

to do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form of

hydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainable

process (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, the

intervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted,

and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction]