ABSTRAK
Selama ini, banyak yang telah percaya bahwa strategi rebalancing merupakansalah satu metode manajemen risiko portofolio yang juga dapat memberikantambahan tingkat pengembalian (rebalancing bonus) bagi yang melakukannya,dan, penelitian ini membuktikan jika rebalanced portfolio menghasilkan risikoyang lebih rendah pada saat masa krisis 2008 dan 2013, serta hasil investasi yanglebih tinggi daripada unrebalanced portfolio selama periode investasi 10 tahun.Tetapi ternyata, pengujian secara statistik menyimpulkan bahwa tidak adaperbedaan yang signifikan antara hasil rebalanced portfolio dengan unrebalancedportfolio, dan strategi rebalancing lebih tepat jika diterapkan pada industriprogresif daripada industri defensif. Simulasi penelitian ini juga sudah melibatkanbiaya transaksi.

---

ABSTRACT
During this time, many have believed that rebalancing strategy is one of portfoliorisk management methods which can also provide additional returns (rebalancingbonus), and this research found that rebalanced portfolio resulted in a lower riskat the time of the 2008 crisis and 2013, as well as higher investment returns thannon-rebalanced portfolio during the investment period of 10 years. But it turnsout that statistically testing concluded that there was no significant differencebetween the results of the non-rebalanced portfolio versus rebalanced portfolio,and rebalancing strategies are more appropriate when applied to a progressiveindustry than defensive industry. This simulation study also involves transactioncosts variable.