ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai kebijakan penegasan penerbitan faktur pajak yangdiatur dalam Surat Edaran Dirjen Pajak No. SE-26/PJ/2015. Kebijakan tersebutmengatur mengenai tanggal penerbitan faktur pajak yang seharusnya yaitu pada saatdiberikannya nomor seri faktur pajak oleh DJP. Penerbitan faktur pajak yang tidaksesuai dengan kebijakan dalam SE-26 yang telah diatur sebelumnya dalam PER-24/PJ/2012 merupakan faktur pajak tidak lengkap atau disebut sebagai faktur pajakbackdate, sehingga bagi PKP Penjual dikenakan sanksi administrasi sebesar 2% dariDPP berdasarkan UU KUP Pasal 14 Ayat (4) dan bagi PKP Pembeli pajakmasukannya tidak dapat dikreditkan. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk menjelaskankebijakan penegasan penerbitan faktur pajak ditinjau dari asas kepastian (certainty)dan untuk menjelaskan kebijakan penegasan penerbitan faktur pajak terhadap biayakepatuhan (compliance cost) PKP. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatifdeskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kebijakan penegasan penerbitanfaktur pajak tidak memenuhi asas kepastian hukum (certainty) dalam hal tidakterpenuhinya faktor-faktor kepastian hukum yaitu materi/obyek kebijakan, subyek,pendefinisian aturan, perluasan materi kebijakan karena keberlakuan efektifkebijakan yaitu 2 April 2015, tetapi DJP memberikan surat klarifikasi penggantianfaktur pajak tidak lengkap untuk faktur pajak tahun 2013, 2014 dan 2015. Selain itu,dikarenakan kebijakan ini tidak memberikan kepastian hukum bagi PKP, makamenimbulkan biaya kepatuhan PKP berupa direct money cost, time cost danpyschological cost

---

ABSTRACT
This study discusses the issuance of tax invoices affirmation policy as regulated inthe Directorate General of Taxation No. SE-26 / PJ / 2015. The policy stipulate theissuance date of the tax invoice is supposed at the time when the tax invoice serialnumber given by the Directorate General of Taxation. The issuance of tax invoiceswhich are not in accordance with the policy as regulated in SE-26 that had beenarranged earlier in PER-24 / PJ / 2012 is considered as an incomplete tax invoice oris referred to as backdated tax invoice, therefore the taxable person shall be subject toadministrative sanction amounting to 2% of the tax base as regulated in Article 14Paragraph (4) of General Provision Tax Law Number 36 Year 2008 and VAT INunable to be credited by the related of taxable person. The purpose of this research isto explain the policy affirmation on issuance of tax invoices policy as viewed fromthe principle of certainty and to explain the policy affirmation issuance of taxinvoices to the cost of compliance taxable person. This research applies quantitativedescriptive. The results of this study concluded that the policy affirmation issuanceof tax invoices did not met the principle of legal certainty in the case of nonfulfillmentof the factors of legal certainty that the material/object of the policy,subject, defining rules, expansion of policies in terms of the effective enforceabilityof the policy is April 2, 2015, but the Directorate General of Taxation issues the taxclarification letter for the replacement of incomplete tax invoices issued on 2013,2014 and 2015. In addition because of this policy does not provide legal certainty fortaxable person, then generate compliance cost in the form of direct money cost, timecost and pyschological cost.