Tujuan: untuk mengetahui profil dan faktor-faktor apa saja yang memepengaruhi kesintasan pada pasien-pasien paska radikal nefrektomi di Rumah Sakit Kanker Dharmais. Metode Penelitian: Semua pasien keganasan ginjal paska operasi radikal nefrektomi di Rumah Sakit Kanker Dharmais pada periode Juni 2009- September 2016 diinklusikan, dan data diambil secara retrospektif melalui rekam medis pasien. Variabel yang dinilai dalam studi ini meliputi: jenis kelamin, usia, stadium, histopatologi subyek, tindakan pembedahan, tindakan sistemik setelah tindakan pembedahan, ureum dan kreatinin sebelum dan sesudah operasi, metastais, pemeriksaan penunjang setelah tindakan pembedahan. Hasil Penelitian: Pada penelitian ini, distribusi Fuhrman grade pada subjek adalah grade I 6,1 ; grade II 37,9 ; grade III 43,9 ; dan grade IV 12,1 . Fuhrman grade 3-4 mempunyai prognosis yang lebih buruk dibandingkan grade 1-2. Fuhrman stage 3-4 memiliki hazard risk 2,829x terhadap Fuhrman grade 1-2 p:0,011 .Selain itu, T3-T4 mempunyai prognosis yang lebih buruk dibandingkan dengan T1-2, TNM stage 3 dan 4 memiliki hazard risk masing-masing 13,076x dan 113x dibandingkan TNM stage 1 P

---

Objective to find out the profiles and factors that influence survival in post radical nephrectomy patients at the Dharmais Cancer Hospital. Methods All patients of post operative renal malignancy of nephrectomy at Dharmais Cancer Hospital from June 2009 to September 2016 were included, and the data were retrospectively retrieved through the patient 39 s medical record. The variables assessed in the study included sex, age, stage, histopathology of the subjects, surgical action, systemic action after surgery, urea and creatinine before and after surgery, metastasis, investigation after surgery. Results In this study, the distribution of Fuhrman grade on the subject was grade I 6.1 grade II 37.9 grade III 43.9 and grade IV 12.1 . Fuhrman grade 3 4 has a worse prognosis than grade 1 2. Fuhrman stage 3 4 has a hazard risk of 2.829x against Fuhrman grade 1 2 p 0.011 . In addition, T3 T4 has a worse prognosis compared to T1 2, TNM stage 3 and 4 have a respective hazard risk 13.076x and 113x compared to TNM stage 1 P