Tulisan ini menganalisis peran Humanity & Inclusion (H&I) dalam proses sosialisasi norma Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode process tracing, penulis mengaplikasikan konsepsi mengenai norma internasional dalam melihat bagaimana peran H&I dalam proses sosialisasi norma HAM disabilitas di Indonesia berdasarkan teori sosialisasi norma internasional oleh Risse & Ropp (2013) yang terdiri dari lima fase. Dalam setiap fase, penulis menganalisis kondisi domestik yang melatari serta mekanisme sosialisasi norma oleh H&I. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa H&I baru mulai berperan dalam sosialisasi norma CRPD pada fase tactical concession dengan mekanisme peningkatan kapasitas dan persuasi mengingat kondisi domestik Indonesia yang cenderung represif terhadap isu disabilitas. Pada fase selanjutnya yaitu prescriptive status, dengan kondisi domestik Indonesia yang telah memberikan ruang bagi isu-isu HAM, H&I menggunakan tiga mekanisme utama yakni peningkatan kapasitas, persuasi, dan pemberian insentif. Selanjutnya, tesis ini menemukan bahwa peran H&I tidak berlanjut pada fase rule-consistent behavior menimbang masih adanya ketidaksesuaian antara perilaku Indonesia dengan norma CRPD.

---

This paper delves on investigating the role of Humanity & Inclusion (H&I) in the process of socialization of the Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) as human rights norm in Indonesia. By using process-tracing method, the author applied framework of international human right norm in elaborating the role of H&I in socializing disability human rights norms in Indonesia based on the theory of international norm socialization by Risse & Ropp (2013) which consists of five phases. In each phase, the author analyzes the underlying domestic conditions and the norm socialization mechanism by H&I. The result shows that H&I begun to contribute in socialization of CRPD in tactical concession phase with two mechanisms, i.e. capacity building and persuasion; considering Indonesias domestic condition during the phase that tended to be repressive towards disability issues. In the next phase, prescriptive status, as Indonesias domestic conditions began to provide space for human rights issues, H&I implements three mechanisms, i.e. capacity building, persuasion, and incentives. Further, the author finds that H&Is role does not progress to the rule-consistent behavior phase considering that Indonesia does not fully comply with the norm.