UI - Tesis Membership :: Back

UI - Tesis Membership :: Back

Tinjauan Yuridis Implementasi Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 11/PRT/M/2019 terhadap Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah Susun = Juridical Study on Implementation of Minister of General Working and People Housing Regulation Number 11/PRT/M/2019 on Provision of Sales and Purchase Agreement of Apartment

Rahima Malik; Ratih Lestarini, supervisor; Tjip Ismail, examiner; Tri Hayati, examiner (Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2020)

 Abstract

Pembangunan rumah susun menjadi alternative solusi permasalahan perumah di Indonesia di tengah-tengah kebutuhan tempat tinggal yang semakin meningkat. Salah satu aspek penting dalam rumah susun adalah perolehannya yang saat ini dapat dilakukan saat fisik bangunan rumah susun tersebut belum terbangun (pre-project selling) Mengantisipasi perkembangan dan kebutuhan tersebut, Pemerintah menerbitkan Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 11/PRT/M/2019 tentang Sistem Perjanjian Pendahuluan Jual Beli Rumah. Namun, berbagai kalangan menganggap aturan tersebut tidak adil bagi pengembang. Aturan yang dianggap tidak adil dalam aturan tersebut adalah antara lain (1) ketentuan mengenai pemasaran yang membebankan tanggung jawab penuh kepada pengembang terhadpa informasi yang disampaikan oleh agen pemsaran; (2) Pengembang wajib mengembalikan seluruh pembayaran dengan potongan 10% kepada konsumen. Dikarenakan aturan tersebut, kemudian timbul persoalan mengenai kesetaraan pengembang dan konsumen rumah susun dalam jual beli satuan rumah susun.

The development of Apartment across Indonesia has been an alternate solution amidst housing problems in Indonesia. One of the key aspects in Apartment subject is the provision of apartment which for the time being may be procured before the physical of apartment even exists (pre project selling). In consideration of the above complexities and development, the Government of Indonesia enacted Minister of General Construction and People Housing Regulation Number No. 11/PRT/M/2019. However, the promulgation has attracted critcicsm due to the provisin contained in the regulation doesnt reflect the equality or fairness for the developer. Some of the provision being criticized are (1) provision for developer to fully take responsibility for every marketing activity conducted by external marketing agen; (2) Developer shall return full payment with deduction of 10% in case of cancellation by consumer. Nothwithstanding the provision, questions are raised on the equality between developer and consumer in apartment transaction.

 Digital Files: 1

Shelf
 T-Rahima Malik.pdf :: Download

LOGIN required

 Metadata

Collection Type : UI - Tesis Membership
Call Number : T-pdf
Main entry-Personal name :
Additional entry-Personal name :
Additional entry-Corporate name :
Study Program :
Subject :
Publishing : Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2020
Cataloguing Source LibUI ind rda
Content Type text
Media Type computer
Carrier Type online resource
Physical Description xii, 120 pages : illustration ; appendix
Concise Text
Holding Institution Universitas Indonesia
Location Perpustakaan UI
  • Availability
  • Review
  • Cover
Call Number Barcode Number Availability
T-pdf 15-21-122158344 TERSEDIA
Review:
No review available for this collection: 20509379
Cover