Penelitian ini membahas pelaksanaan Health Risk Assessment di PT X Area OperasiBagian Utara. Penelitian bertujuan mengkaji data hasil ukur dosis personal selama 1 periodepengukuran tahun 2015 – 2017 dan melakukan penilaian risiko kesehatan dengan metodeanalisis semi-kuantitatif dengan mengacu Risk Assessment Matrix IPIECA & OGP 2006.Hasil penelitian ini teridentifikasi 9 SEG, namun setelah dikaji secara kuantitatifterdapat SEG yang perlu diklasifikasikan menjadi beberapa sub-group dan health hazardhanya mengacu pada dokumen sekunder sebanyak 10 health hazard. Terdapat keragamanhasil ukur dosis personal dalam 1 SEG menunjukkan salah satu kelemahan pengklasifikasianSEG yang hanya mengacu jabatan pekerjaan saja. Residual Risk Level pada setiap SEGuntuk seluruh bahaya gas (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene) berada pada tingkatanlow risk, kecuali untuk H2S yang masuk kategori medium risk. Sementara noisediklasifikasikan low risk pada SEG GS Operator, MWT Operator, Gas Operator, Welder,Company Representative dan noise masuk medium risk pada sebagian SEG Technician shopterutama pada saat pekerjaan metalizing.Risk level bahaya H2S tidak dapat diturunkan menjadi Low mengingat tingkatseverity berada pada tingkatan high (4). Penurunan risk level bahaya noise dapat dilakukandengan konsistensi implementasi HCP dan perlu dilakukan pengukuran efektifitas fungsiearmuff / earplugs untuk mengetahui dosis efektif yang diterima pekerja. Risiko kesehatanpada tingkatan Low Risk, tetap harus dikelola agar level risk tidak meningkat sehingga PT Xtetap melanjutkan penerapan existing control dan memastikan pelaksanaan kajian HRA lebihmendalam dengan melakukan observasi / wawancara untuk mengetahui efektifitasimplementasi existing control terhadap Potential Risk Level dan Residual Risk Level.

---

This Health Risk Assessment research that was implemented at PT X North

Operations Area. The aims of this study was to review the data on personal dose exposure

measurement results for 1 measurement period 2015 - 2017 and conduct a health risk

assessment using a semi-quantitative analysis method with reference to the IPIECA & OGP

Risk Assessment Matrix Year 2006.

The results of this study identified 9 SEGs, but after being studied quantitatively

there were SEGs that needed to be classified into several sub-groups and health hazards only

referred to secondary documents as many as 10 health hazards. There is a variety of personal

dose measurement results in 1 SEG showing one of the weaknesses in the classification of

SEG which only refers to job title. The Residual Risk Level in each SEG for all gas hazards

(Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene) is at a low risk level, except for H2S which is in

the medium risk category. Meanwhile, noise is classified as low risk in SEG GS Operators,

MWT Operators, Gas Operators, Welder, Company Representatives and noise is a medium

risk in several SEG Technician shops, especially during metalizing work.

The H2S risk level cannot be lowered to low considering that the severity level is at

a high level (4). Reducing the risk level of noise hazards can be implemented by consistent

implementation of HCP and it is necessary to measure the effectiveness of the earmuff /

earplugs function to determine the effective dose received by workers. Health risks at the

Low Risk level must still be managed so that the risk level does not increase so that PT X

continues to implement existing controls and ensure the implementation a comprehensive

HRA study by conducting observations / interviews to determine the effectiveness of

implementing existing controls on the Potential Risk Level and Residual Risk Level