Tesis ini merupakan hasil penelitian tentang analisis penerapan diversi dalam tahap penyidikan tindak pidana kekerasan fisik yang dilakukan oleh penyidik Satreskrim pada Kepolisian Resor Metro Jakarta Selatan (Polres Metro Jaksel) terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum (AKH) pada tahap penyidikan yang belum memberikan hasil maksimal dalam melindungi anak secara hukum. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif-kualitatif yang bersumber dari data primer dan sekunder dengan metode pengumpulan data yang dilakukan dengan cara wawancara informan primer, observasi dan telaahan dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama, pelaksanaan diversi di Satreskrim Polres Metro Jaksel belum sejalan dengan semangat diversi sebagaimana diatur dalam UU SPPA. Kedua, terdapat beberapa faktor yang mendorong terwujudnya pelaksanaan diversi di Satreskrim Polres Metro Jaksel yaitu: (1) adanya keinginan dari pelaku maupun korban untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan melalui musyawarah mufakat; (2) adanya kesediaan dari korban maupun keluarganya untuk bertemu dan bermusyawarah dengan pelaku dan atau keluarganya; dan (3) adanya kesepakatan yang dicapai antara pelaku dan korban dalam penyelesaian perselisihan melalui musyawarah. Ketiga, pada masa mendatang, penyidik Satreskrim Polres Metro Jaksel dapat menerapkan model diversi musyawarah masyarakat yang melibatkan polisi, pelaku dan/atau orangtua/ walinya, korban dan/atau orangtua/walinya, pembimbing kemasyarakatan dan masyarakat (tokoh masyarakat atau dari pihak sekolah) sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh UU SPPA. Model musyawarah mufakat memberikan kesempatan bagi seluruh pihak untuk memberikan pandangan mengenai pentingnya penyelesaian perselisihan melalui pendekatan keadilan restoratif bagi pelaku dan korban beserta keluarga maupun masyarakat agar hubungan kedua belah pihak dapat dipulihkan kembali seperti sedia kala.

---

The thesis is a result of research on the analysis of the implementation of diversion in the investigation stage of a criminal act of physical violence carried out by investigators of the South Jakarta Metro Police (Polres Metro Jaksel) especially Satreskrim Branch against a child in conflict with the law (AKH) at the investigation stage which has not provided maximum results in protecting child legally. This research was conducted by descriptive-qualitative method sourced from primary and secondary data with data collection methods carried out by primary informant interviews, observation and document review. The results of the study show, first, that the implementation of diversion at the Satreskrim South Jakarta Metro Police is not in line with the spirit of diversion as regulated in the SPPA Law. Second, there are several factors that encourage the realization of the implementation of diversion at the Satreskrim South Jakarta Metro Police, namely: (1) the desire of the perpetrators and victims to resolve disputes through deliberation and consensus; (2) the willingness of the victim and his family to meet and discuss with the perpetrator and or his family; and (3) an agreement was reached between the perpetrator and the victim in the settlement of disputes through deliberation. Third, in the future, Satreskrim of South Jakarta Metro Police investigators can apply a community consultation diversion model involving the police, perpetrators and/or their parents/guardians, victims and/or their parents/guardians, community advisors and the community (community leaders or from the school) as mandated by the SPPA Act. The consensus deliberation model provides an opportunity for all parties to provide their views on the importance of resolving disputes through a restorative justice approach for perpetrators and victims and their families and communities so that the relationship between the two parties can be restored to stage previously.