Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Decentralisation system in Indonesia was introduced after the fall of the former President Soehartowith the objective of ensuring good governance and equitable development across all regions inthe country. Unfortunately, the implementation of desentralisasi has been complicated. Somescholars have suggested that the model was flawed as it did not consider Indonesia’s context of lessdeveloped administrative institutions in the regions. Not only did desentralisasi cause headachesfor the government, it also created confusion for foreign investors. Consequently, it affects theinvestment climate in the country and undermines the perception of Indonesia as an attractiveplace to invest in. In certain cases, desentralisasi has also led to claims by foreign investors forinvestor-State arbitration under Indonesia’s international investment agreements (IIAs). Thispaper analyses the problems of desentralisasi in Indonesia, its effects to foreign investors andsuggests ways to alleviate the problems by modifying and using Indonesia’s IIAs effectively.Setelah jatuhnya rezim Soeharto, sistem pemerintahan desentralisasi mulai diterapkan diIndonesia dengan tujuan untuk memastikan tata kelola yang baik dan pembangunan yangadil di seluruh wilayah Republik Indonesia. Sayangnya, penerapan desentralisasi sangatlahsulit. Beberapa akademisi mengatakan bahwa model sistem desentralisasi yang diterapkan diIndonesia tidak sesuai dengan situasi di lapangan di Indonesia, khususnya di daerah-daerahyang belum mempunyai kantor-kantor administratif yang berfungsi dengan baik. Desentralisasimenimbulkan berbagai masalah bagi pemerintah dan membingungkan para investor asing.Akibatnya, desentralisasi memperburuk iklim investasi di Indonesia dan menimbulkan persepsinegatif mengenai Indonesia sebagai tempat berinvestasi. Dalam beberapa kasus tertentu,desentralisasi juga menyebabkan munculnya tuntutan-tuntutan oleh para investor asing diarbitrase antara investor dan Pemerintah berdasarkan perjanjian investasi internasional (PII)Indonesia. Makalah ini menganalisa masalah-masalah yang ditimbulkan oleh desentralisasi diIndonesia, efek-efeknya bagi para investor asing dan memberikan saran mengenai cara-carauntuk menangani beberapa masalah tersebut dengan mengubah dan menggunakan PII Indonesiasecara efektif."

"Tanjung Pinang City is a transit area for troubled Indonesian overseas workers from Singaporeand Malaysia. Previous research revealed that citizens of Tanjung Pinang City criticized thetreatments given by the local government to the deported workers by reason that they were notthe citizens of the Riau Islands Province, yet the local government has to provide shelters andfunds prior to returning them to their home towns. The treatments for the deported workers in thetransit area have also raised pros and cons among the stakeholders who are in charge of handlingthe deported workers. This circumstance may not occur if a special regional regulation of theRiau Islands Province has been issued to govern the troubled Indonesian overseas workers in thetransit area. Due to this vacuum of law, this research aims to establish a mechanism in handlingthe deported workers in the transit area by designing an integrative-progressive model which canbe adopted by the stakeholders. The model is to link the legal and non- legal issues and as wellas to provide the collaborative mechanisms for the stakeholders based on the approaches of theintegrative and progressive legal theory.Kota Tanjung Pinang merupakan salah satu daerah transit bagi Tenaga Kerja IndonesiaBermasalah/TKIB yang dideportasi dari Malaysia dan Singapura. Pada penelitian sebelumnyamenyatakan bahwa penduduk Tanjung Pinang mengkritisi layanan yang diberikan pemerintahkota kepada warga deportasi pada dasarnya bukan warga Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Prodan kontra pendapat mengenai kebijakan Pemerintah dalam menangani TKIB termasukpenyediakan rumah penampungan dan pendanaan untuk memulangkan mereka ke kampunghalamannya. Hal ini tidak akan terjadi seandainya Pemerintah Kepulauan Riau menerbit Perdaterkait penanganan TKIB di daerah transit. Sehubungan dengan kekosongan hukum tersebut,penelitian ini bertujuan merumuskan mekanisme penanganan TKIB di daerah transit denganmerancang model intergratif-progersif yang dapat diadopsi oleh pihak terkait. Model tersebutmenghubungkan persoalan hukum dan non hukum serta mekanisme kolaborasi bagi pihakterkait berdasarkan pendekatan teori hukum intergratif dan progresif."

"Fiduciary Guarantee (Fiduciary Law) which approved by the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR RI) on September 9, 1999 has accommodate the public needs to help business activities and to provide legal certainty to the interested parties. With the increase in the development activities and the needs for funding, a majority of funds are needed to meet the lending and borrowing activities that require protection for the lender and the borrower through a guarantee institution that can provide legal certainty and protection to the lender or the borrower. Viewed from the current lending practices, there is a difficulty on the part of the Fiduciary Guarantee to conduct the fiduciary execution if the Fiduciary Grantor defaults since in fact the goods being a fiduciary object are still in the possession of the Fiduciary Grantor or Debtor, then in line with the provisions of article 1977 of the Indonesian Civil Code, known as the principle of bezit geldt als volkomen titel."

""With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside the courts, and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak, and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"With contributions from leading scholars in constitutional law, this volume examines how carefully designed and limited doctrines of proportionality can improve judicial decision-making, how it is applied in different jurisdictions, its role on constitutionalism outside of courts and whether the principle of proportionality actually advances or detracts from democracy. Contributions from some of the seminal thinkers on the development of scholarship on proportionality (e.g. Alexy, Barak and Beatty) extend their prior work and engage in an important dialogue on the topic. Some offer substantial critiques, others defend the doctrine and offer important clarifications and extensions of their prior work. Throughout, the authors engage not only with case law from around the world, but also with existing scholarly treatments of the subject. Mathematical treatments are avoided, making the book accessible to readers from both 'soft' and hard' social science backgrounds"--"

"The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is one of the company?s organs with the significant role of determining the business course and other issues related to corporate actions; as it is granted by law to the shareholders of the company. Any decision can be made in the GMS; such as determining the shareholders? unanimous concurrence on the proposed meeting agenda or even if the results of the meeting are actually contrary to such agenda caused by dissenting among themselves. However, the GMS can also pose certain obstacles in situations where one or more shareholders (that appear to be a majority shareholder) fail to act in good faith or have an internal dispute with other shareholder(s) in the company. The shareholder concerned can use such majority position to cause a dead-lock in the GMS, as a result of which the rest of the shareholder(s) are unable to make any decisions concerning the proposed GMS agenda. The aim of this article is to look at the effectiveness of Article 86 of the Indonesian Company Law for the purpose of overcoming the above described situation. The said Article 86 was formulated without considering the possibility of shareholder intentionally undertaking such unlawful measures. Moreover, the article is aimed at observing the concordance between the Indonesian Company Law and the Indonesian Procedural Law."

"Since eradicating corruption having been continously encouraged by late governments ? and until now ? , there would not be less important as to retracting the corrupted assets. There are many aspects to be considered in doing such action, such as manifesting the legal aspects of administrative law, and so other applied national regulations. By these regulations, such as Law No. 7 of 2006 on Ratification of United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa Anti-Korupsi, 2003), Law Number 25 of 2003 On Amendment to Law Number 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering, Act 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission, Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, and Government Regulation Number 65 of 1999 on Implementation Procedures for Examination of State Property, retraction the corrupted assets should be define in order to get known about eradicating corruption. Another issue that urgently to be defined, as it also become main subject of retracting assets, is the asset itself. Indeed, as the asset which become mainly discussed about is State assets. So, it would be very necessary to clearly have a distinction between State responsibility and that of irresponsibility of the State, in order to settle down, as an after effect, many interpretations."

"Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 yang memaknai Pasal 29 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 memperbolehkan pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan selama dalam ikatan perkawinan postnuptial agreement serta pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan. Ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan yaitu keberlakuan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat selama dalam ikatan perkawinan serta akibat hukum pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan menelaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 dan menganalisanya dengan teori untuk mendapatkan jawaban dari permasalahan. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut menyatakan bahwa perjanjian perkawinan berlaku sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan kecuali ditentukan lain dalam perjanjian perkawinan. Dapat disimpulkan, berlaku surutnya postnuptial agreement sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan akan mengakibatkan perubahan kedudukan harta perkawinan yang berpotensi merugikan pihak ketiga. Selain itu, perubahan kedudukan harta perkawinan dari harta bersama menjadi harta pribadi menyebabkan harta bersama yang telah ada harus dilakukan pemisahan dan pembagian padahal harta bersama merupakan pemilikan bersama yang terikat yang hanya dapat diakhiri karena berakhirnya perkawinan. Pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan berpotensi merugikan pihak ketiga karena itu akta pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan sebaiknya diberitahukan dan diumumkan serta dicatatkan agar dapat diketahui pihak ketiga. Akibat hukum pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan terhadap harta perkawinan adalah kedudukan harta perkawinan kembali pada kedudukan semula sehingga berlaku ketentuan Pasal 35 dan 36 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974, sedangkan akibat hukum terhadap pihak ketiga tidak berlaku mutlak, tetap berlaku kedudukan harta perkawinan sebelum pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan.

---

Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 PUU XII 2015 which interprets article 29 of The 1974 Marriage Law Law No. 1 of 1974 allows execution of postnuptial agreement, an agreement entered into after a marriage has taken place, as well as to repeal marriage agreement prenuptial, postnuptial. The Decision raised the question on the validity of an existing postnuptial agreement and what would be the impact of the repeal of marriage agreement. The method used in this research is normative juridical by reviewing and analyzing theorically The Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 69 PUU XIII 2015 to answer the question. The Decision of The Constitutional Court stipulates that ldquo The agreement valid since the wedding took place, unless otherwise specified in marriage agreement. rdquo The conclusion from this study is that the retroactive validity of postnuptial agreement caused changes in the status of marital property which may cause disadvantage to any third party. In addition, the change in the status of marital property from joint property to private property causes existing joint property to be split and division whereas joint property is a bonded joint ownership that can only be terminated due to the end of marriage. The repeal of marriage agreement potentially has a negative impact to third parties, hence should be notified, announced and registered. The law impact of marital property due to the repeal of marriage agreement is the fact that joint property will be reinstated, matters relating thereto shall be afforded the same status as that applicable prior to repealed, therefore article 35 and 36 of The 1974 Marriage Law applied, whereas impact on third parties shall not apply absolute, retain the status of the marital property prior to repealed."