Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The investment Act No. 25/2007 has been released to replace the foreign Investment Act No. 1/ 1967 jo Act No.11/1970 and the Domestic Act No. 6 / 1968 jo Act No.12/1970....."

"The investment Act No. 25/2007 has been released to replace the foreign investment act No. 1/1967 jo act No. 11/1970 and the domestic arrangement avows that all implimentated-regulations related to those acts firmly applicableas far as the regelatuions do not contradict to and not be arranged yet by new regulation according to the new-released act...."

"Tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif terhadap data kepustakaan atau data sekunder. Yang menjadi permasalahan adalah apakah pengambilalihan saham mayoritas lewat pasar modal oleh investor asing tunduk pada ketentuan investasi langsung atau tidak langsung dan apa akibat dari ketidakpastian hukum tersebut terdapat kegiatan investasi di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan pandangan hukum tentang pembelian saham mayoritas melalui investasi portofolio oleh investor asing. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga dimaksudkan untuk memberikan masukan dalam upaya mengatasi dampak ketidakpastian hukum bagi investor asing pada investasi portofolio. Tesis ini menyimpulkan bahwa pengambilalihan saham mayoritas lewat pasar modal oleh investor asing tunduk baik pada ketentuan investasi langsung maupun ketentuan investasi tidak langsung pada saat pembelian saham mayoritas tersebut bertujuan mengambilalih perusahaan terbuka dan/atau berdampak pada perubahan pengendalian baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung oleh investor asing. Sumber permasalahan yang menyebabkan munculnya ketidakpastian hukum pembatasan pembelian saham mayoritas oleh investor asing lewat pasar modal yaitu adanya adopsi hukum enterprised based definition sebagaimana ditetapkan dalam Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal Indonesia. Hal ini menyebabkan pertama, sulitnya pasar modal Indonesia memilah-milah jenis transaksi investasi portofolio yang bersifat spekulatif dan potensial merugikan yang berdampak sistemik; kedua, terjadinya benturan antara kepentingan pemerintah yang mengutamakan kepentingan nasional dan investor asing yang hendak melakukan pembelian saham mayoritas; ketiga, investor asing merasa diperlakukan tidak adil yang mengakibatkan keraguan investor dalam menanamkan modal di Indonesia.

---

This thesis utilizes a normative juridical research method of literature data or secondary data in its analysis. It attempts to identify whether the acquisition of majority shares through capital markets by foreign investors are subject to the provisions of direct investment or indirect investment regulations. It further analyzes the impact of these legal uncertainties on investment activities in Indonesia. The main objective of this thesis is to provide legal opinion concerning legal basis for acquiring majority shares through portfolio investment by foreign investors. Analysis of the impact of the legal uncertainties of the acquisition of majority shares by foreign investors will specify input for addressing problems arising from the uncertainties.

The thesis concludes that the acquisition of majority shares through capital markets by foreign investors are subject to both the provisions of direct investment and indirect investment if the intention of the foreign investors to acquire a company or to control the management of a company. The very roots problems of legal uncertainties of such acquisition emanates from legal adoption of enterprise based definition as stipulated in Indonesian Investment Law No. 25 of the year 2007.

This adoption has caused some constraints as follows: first, it is difficult for the Indonesian capital market to identify and to sort out the type of portfolio investment transactions that are speculative and potentially have unintended adverse impact which leads to systemic problems; secondly, the occurrence of conflict of interest between giving priority to national interests and the interests of foreign investors intending to acquire majority shares; third, the uncertainties of legal limitation of majority share acquisition cause doubts of investing in Indonesia as foreign investors feel that they are unfairly treated."

"Penyelenggaraan perizinan dalam rangka Penanaman Modal dilaksanakan melalui berbagai sistem bermula sebagai embrio pelayanan dengan nama/nomenklatur Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Atap (PTSA) dimana dalam perkembangannya pelayanan itu tersebar dan memiliki aneka penamaan, mulai dari pelayanan bersama, Sistem Administrasi Manunggal Satu Atap (SAMSAT) dan PTSA. Akan tetapi dalam pelaksanaannya masih terdapat hambatan dan belum dapat menjamin serta memberikan pelayanan yang sederhana, cepat, mudah, murah dan transparan bagi masyarakat dan pelaku usaha. Oleh karena itu diharapkan penyelenggaraan perizinan Penanaman Modal saat ini melalui Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (PTSP) yang merupakan salah satu urusan wajib pemerintahan di bidang Penanaman Modal yang dilimpahkan kepada Pemerintah Daerah mampu memberikan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum, penyederhanaan proses pelayanan, pemberian pelayanan yang cepat, mudah, murah, transparan, pasti dan terjangkau serta mendekatkan pelayanan kepada masyarakat, calon investor dan pelaku usaha. Tesis ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana penyelenggaraan PTSP bidang Penanaman Modal sebelum berlakunya Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun 2013 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu dan hal-hal apa saja yang menjadi hambatan dalam penyelenggaraannya serta menganalisis apakah penyelenggaraan PTSP bidang Penanaman Modal yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta setelah berlakunya Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun 2013 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu telah sesuai dengan sistem hukum berdasarkan struktur, substansi dan budaya hukum. Penelitian yang akan digunakan peneliti adalah bersifat eksploratif dan deskriptif. Metode yang Penulis gunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan bersifat evaluatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelenggaraan perizinan Penanaman Modal melalui PTSP sebelum berlakunya Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun 2013 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu masih terdapat hambatanhambatan yang ada dan Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta dalam penyelenggaraan perizinan Penanaman Modal melalui PTSP setelah berlakunya Peraturan Daerah No. 12 Tahun 2013 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu telah sesuai dengan sistem hukum berdasarkan sistem, substansi dan budaya hukum.

---

Investment licensing was implemented through various systems began as an embryo with the name/nomenclature One Roof Service (ORS) where the services were scattered and had various naming, ranging from joint service, One Stop Corporate Administration (OSCA) and ORS. However in its implementation there are still obstacles and have not been able to guarantee and provide as well as offer a service that simple, fast, cheap and transparently to the public and business operators. Hence it is expected that the implementation of investment licensing now through One Stop Service (OSS) which is one of the mandatory government affairs in the field of investment sector are delegated to local governments are able to provide protection and legal certainty, simplification service process, service delivery rapid, easy, cheap, transparent, definite and afforadable as well as facilitating the public, potential investors and business operators.

This thesis aims to analyze how the implementation of OSS investment before the enactment of local regulation, which was recorded in the Provincial Gazette as Local Regulation No. 12 Year 2013 on OSS Implementation and what things the obstacles in its commissioning and analyze whether conduct of the OSS investment undertaken by the Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta after the enactment of Local Regulation No. 12 Year 2013 on OSS Implementation were in line with the legal system based on the structure, substance and legal culture. The research will be used by researcher is exploratory and descriptive. The author use normative legal research methodology and tend to evaluative sense.

The results showed that the investment licensing through OSS prior to the Local Regulation No. 12 Year 2013 on OSS Implementation there are still barriers that exist and the Provincial Government of DKI Jakata through the enactment of Local Regulation No. 12 Year 2013 on OSS Implementation were in line with the legal system based on the system, substance and legal culture."

"Tesis ini membahas hubnmgan antara investasi sektor properti dan non properti terhadap PDB. Penelitian ini juga untuk mengetahui faktor yang mempengaruhi PDB dalam jangka pendek maupun jangka panjang, Metodologi yang diperguuakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode Granger Causality, selain itu juga digunakan metode Vektor Koreksi Kesalahan (VECM). Bcrdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa investasi sektor properti mempengaruhi PDB dan investasi selctor non properti tidak mempengamhi PDB. Hasil regresi VECM menunjukkan adanya pengamh investasi sektor properti PMDN dan investasi sektor non propcni PMA terhadap PDB dalam jangka pendek, sedaugkan investasi sehor properti PMA dan PMDN, serta sektor non properti PMDN mempengaruhi PDB dalamjangka panjang.

---

The focus of this study is to know relation between property sector and non property sector investment to GDP. This study is also to find out factor that influence GDP in short run and long nm. The methodology method that is being used in this research are Granger Causality Test and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). Based on the research result which has done before, this could be into conclusion that property sector investment influence GDP and non property sector investment not intluence GDP. VECM regression show property sector investment PMDN and non property sector investment PMA influence GDP in short run, whereas property sector investment PMA and PMDN, and also non property sector investment PMDN influence GDP in long nm."