Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In order to increased voluntary disclosure from the tax payer, the Indonesian government trough Directorate General of Tax making a tax reforms and the policy that the government choose is by using tax amnesty policy. At the year 1984 the government has been issued a tax amnesty policy, but this policy failed in implementation and the government never evaluated the failure. At 2008 the government issuing the same tax amnesty policy and it called sunset policy.

This research will explain about government comparison when issuing tax amnesty policy at the year 1984 and the year 2008, what exactly becomes the major obstacle on the implementation of the tax amnesty policy at the year 1984, and what are the differences between tax amnesties that were used at 1984 with tax amnesty that used in 2008. The approach used in this research is qualitative approach. The goal is to find an understanding about tax amnesty policy that implemented in Indonesia since 1984 until 2008. The research type is descriptive because the researcher tries to give a detailed description about tax amnesty policy that implemented in Indonesia since 1984 until 2008. Data collected in this research is by trough in depth interview with Directorate General of Tax, academic, tax payer, and tax expert. Beside that the data was also collected trough study literature, books, magazine, journals, and the tax regulation which are related to tax amnesty at the year 1984 and 2008.

The result from this research found that the government rationale issuing tax amnesty policy at the year 1984 because of the change of tax system in Indonesia from official assessment system to self assessment system. The change of tax system needs honesty and voluntary disclosure from every tax payer. Based on that reason, the government issuing tax amnesty policy. At the year 2008 the government tries to collect taxation data from Indonesian citizen who already registered as tax payer and the citizen who are not registered as tax payer. In order to make the tax payer willing to declare the taxation data that they have, government issuing tax amnesty policy. The obstacle on the implementation of tax amnesty at the year 1984 are because the limitation of taxation data, information technology, tax authorities who are not ready with this policy, and public perception of unfairness in tax amnesty. The main differences between tax amnesty at the year 1984 and 2008 is what the government forgiven. At the year 1984 the government forgives all the tax liabilities including interest, penalties, and other prosecution, whereas tax amnesty at the year 2008 only forgive the interest."

"Indonesia mengalami shortfall penerimaan pajak dengan tingkat kepatuhan wajib pajak hanya 60% pada tahun 2015. Untuk mengatasinya, Pemerintah menerapkan pengampunan pajak pada Juli 2016. Skripsi ini membahas bagaimana pengampunan pajak dapat memperluas basis pemajakan dan faktor pendukung keberhasilan pelaksanaan pengampunan pajak di Indonesia. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan melakukan studi lapangan dan pustaka. Hasil Penelitian ini adalah pengampunan pajak bisa memperluas basis pemajakan di Indonesia dan disarankan agar pemerintah mempertimbangkan empat faktor pendukung, yaitu fasilitas yang menarik, sosialisasi yang masif, penempatan dana hasil pengampunan pajak yang menguntungkan, dan manajemen data yang baik.

---

Indonesia faced shortfall of its tax revenue and low level of tax payer?s compliance (approximately 60%) in 2015. To solve this problems, Indonesia is implementing tax amnesty in July 2016. The purpose of this thesis is to describe how tax amnesty can broaden Indonesia tax base and explain its supportive factors. This research conducted qualitative approach with data collection through field research and literature studies. The result of this research is tax amnesty can broaden Indonesia tax base and suggested to consider four supportive factors such as attractive facilities, massive socialization, profitable instrument for repatriated assets, and good data management."

"Newspapers have important function like information, education, entertainment, economic and other function. Because those functions, associate of newspaper ask tax exemption to Government. Beside that, in Indonesia, newspapers penetration is still low and tax incentives expected can increase this penetration. Until this time, Indonesia Government sets newspaper as VAT object. Study about effectively exemption tax on newspaper must be done in order to get incentive tax usefull. Exemption tax is revenue cost by government. The observer calculated tax exemption on newspaper to know how it can influence cost of structure in Penerbit X and cost of production in Penerbit Y.This research used qualitative approach, by means of literature study, which emphasize books as an object and field study with collecting data by interviewing and also using secondary data. The field study is being executed by interviewing finance and tax accounting at daily newspapers publisher company. The research object limited only on sources data in two newspapers publisher company in DKI Jakarta region.The objective of this research is to describe policy of VAT on newspaper in past time and the implementation policy of VAT on newspaper today. This research is also to suggest about policy on taxation for seen as contribution for Directorate General of Taxation (Direktorat Jenderal Pajak).The result of this research show that between 1986 until 1990 newspapers got tax incentives, VAT Accounted on Government (PPN Ditanggung Pemerintah). Regulation are used President?s Decision (Keputusan Presiden). Because of that time Taxation Act of Value Added Tax did?nt regulated about tax incentives. That policy had no influence with selling price of newspaper and on March 1990 this policy stopped with consideration more and more stable of live press publisher commonly. Implementation of VAT appropriate with regulation.The final conclusion of this research is tax exemption on newspapers have no significant influence on cost production of newspapers."

"Skripsi ini membahas rumusan kebijakan fasilitas pajak penghasilan untuk penanaman modal di bidang-bidang usaha tertentu dan atau di daerah-daerah tertentu dengan studi pada Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 62 Tahun 2008. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui faktor-faktor yang dipertimbangkan dalam perumusan kebijakan fasilitas pajak penghasilan dan melihat kesesuaian faktorfaktor tersebut dengan kebijakan yang dihasilkan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif.Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat kesesuaian antara faktor-faktor yang menjadi pertimbangan dalam perumusan kebijakan dengan kebijakan yang dihasilkan. Faktor-faktor yang menjadi pertimbangan tersebut yaitu pengembangan struktur industri, pengalihan teknologi, penciptaan lapangan pekerjaan, bidang usaha pionir, akses ke pasar internasional, pengembangan daerah tertentu, dan mendukung kebijakan pemerintah. Sedangkan faktor lain yang perlu dipertimbangkan dalam perumusan kebijakan ini adalah fenomena race to the bottom, pembebasan pajak, sinkronisasi peraturan, dan peranan pemerintah daerah dalam menarik investasi.

---

This study focus in policy formula analysis of income tax incentives for investment in spesific industries and or spesific region, a study in ?Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 62 Tahun 2008?. The purpose of this study is to study factors which needs to be considerated in income tax policy formulation and consistency between input factors with the policy itself. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive interpretive.This study conclude there is consistency between input factors with the policy itself. Input factors stated before consist of development in industrial structure, technology transfer, employment creation, pioneer industries, access to overseas market, development in spesific region, and support in government policies. Furthermore, other factors which need to be considered are a race to the bottom phenomena, tax exemption, law consistency, and the role of local government to attract investment."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang pemenuhan kriteria asas-asas perpajakan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2008. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui asas-asas perpajakan apa saja yang terpenuhi dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2008. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan design deskriptif. Pemberlakuan surut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomo 51 Tahun 2008 menimbulkan banyak kerugian bagi Wajib Pajak. Mereka diwajibkan untuk membayar pajak yang terutang bukan pada waktu memperoleh penghasilan (prinsip ability to pay tidak terpenuhi). Perubahan-perubahan peraturan perpajakan atas penghasilan dari usaha jasa konstruksi merepotkan Wajib Pajak karena membuat mereka harus berulang kali mengajukan permohonan pemindahbukuan pajak yang telah dibayar. Pengenaan PPh final bagi seluruh Wajib Pajak usaha konstruksi juga sangat tidak adil karena pengenaan pajak tidak lagi memperhatikan keadaan Wajib Pajak sedang untung atau rugi. Revenue adequacy principle terpenuhi dalam peraturan ini. Equity principle tidak terpenuhi. Certainty principle terpenuhi karena dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2008 pengenaan PPh final atas usaha jasa konstruksi menjadi pasti, tapi convinience sebagai salah satu unsur dari certainty tidak terpenuhi.

---

This thesis discusses about the fulfillment of the criteria of the principles of taxation in Government Regulation No. 51 of 2008. The purpose of this study is to determine the principles of taxation what is fulfilled in Government Regulation No. 51 of 2008. The method used is descriptive qualitative research design. Enabling ebb Government Regulation No. 51 Year 2008 caused much loss to taxpayers. They are required to pay the tax due is not earning at the time (the principle of ability to pay is not met). Changes in tax regulations on business income taxpayers inconvenient construction because they must repeatedly make the transfer request is filed taxes already paid. Imposition of the final income tax for the entire construction business taxpayers also very unfair because the taxation is no longer concern the taxpayer is lucky or loss. Revenue-adequacy principle is fulfilled in this rule. Equity principle is not fulfilled. Certainty principle is fulfilled because the Government Regulation Number 51 Year 2008 final imposition of income tax on construction services business to be sure, but convenience as one element of certainty is not met."

"Skripsi ini membahas implikasi pengenaan kebijakan diferensiasi tarif pajak penghasilan bagi karyawan yang tidak mempunyai NPWP. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan pemerintah dalam mengeluarkan kebijakan diferensiasi tarif pajak penghasilan tidak didasari teori yang kuat. Hukum materiil dengan hukum formal bercampur karena unsur sanksi yang seharusnya terdapat dalam Undang-undang KUP, terdapat dalam tarif Undang-undang Pajak Penghasilan. Pemberlakuan diferensiasi tarif pajak penghasilan bertentangan dengan prinsip ability to pay. Bagi karyawan yang mempunyai penghasilan yang sama besarnya mendapat perlakuan yang berbeda. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidak adilan horizontal. Hendaknya dalam menaikkan penerimaan negara pemerintah hendaknya mengeluarkan kebijakan dengan tidak mengorbankan keadilan bagi masyarakat.

---

The focus of this study is implication of outcome differential tariff income tax policy for employee who don't have Tax Payer Number. This research is qualitative research with descriptive design. The result of this research showed that the goverment policy on Differential tariff income tax didn't have strong theory based. Material law with formal law is mixed because there is penalty element that should have been included in general rule tax law in fact included in income tax law.

The aplication of differential tariff is against with the ability to pay principle. For employee who has same income get different treatment. This situation makes horizontal disequity. In raising country income government should made new policy which don't sacrifice people's equity."

"Pemanasan global adalah masalah dunia, sudah banyak negara membuat kebijakan untuk mengurangi penyebab pemanasan global. Pembuangan gas dari hasil pembakaran bahan bakar fosil yang digunakan kendaraan bermotor adalah salah satu penyebab pemanasan global. Saat ini telah ditemukan mobil yang berteknologi hibrida, mobil yang ramah lingkungan dan hemat bahan bakar. Para pengusaha mengeluhkan pengenaan tarif pajak yang tinggi, PPnBM dan Bea Masuk, menyebabkan harga mobil hibrida menjadi lebih mahal.Penelitian ini menjelaskan perlunya insentif pajak diberikan untuk mobil berteknologi hibrida, kebijakan negara lain terhadap mobil hibrida dan manfaat-manfaat yang akan dirasakan jika mobil ini sudah banyak digunakan oleh masyarakat.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif eksploratif. Tipe penelitian adalah deep interview. Mobil hibrida adalah salah satu solusi untuk mengurangi polusi udara. Pemerintah seharusnya mempertimbangkan untuk memberikan insentif pajak untuk mobil hybrid. Mobil hibrida dapat mengurangi produksi emisi dan juga hemat dalam pemakaian bahan bakar. Jika pemerintah, memberikan insentif pajak untuk mobil hibrida, pembeli mobil hibrida akan meningkat. Jadi, akan mengurangi polusi udara dan hemat dalam pemakaian bahan bakar.

---

Global warming is become the world?s problem, therefore many countries make policies to reduce the cause of global warming. Gas uptake from the ignition of fossil fuel that been used for vehicle is one of the caused global warming. In this days, already invented car with hybrid technology, car that have less air pollution and thrifty fuel. The industrialists complain about the high tax rate, luxury tax and customs, which caused the price of hybrid car, become expensive. This research aim is to explain how important tax incentive that have to give for the car with hybrid technology, about the policies in other countries with the hybrid car, and benefits if this car is use by many people.This research uses the explorative qualitative method. Type of this research is deep interview. Hybrid car is one of the solutions to reduce air pollution. Government should consider giving incentive tax for hybrid car. If government give tax incentive for hybrid car, people that want to buy hybrid car will increase. So it will reduce air pollution and thrift consumption fuel."

"Penelitian ini membahas formulasi kebijakan bantuan penagihan pajak berdasarkan persetujuan penghindaran pajak berganda (P3B) di Indonesia. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis formulasi kebijakan bantuan penagihan pajak berdasarkan P3B yang telah disepakati oleh Indonesia Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitan deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dan literatur yang berasal dari artikel, buku, peraturan dan sumber lain. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa adanya pasal bantuan penagihan pajak di P3B Indonesia dan di dalam Multilateral Convention, maka diperlukan aturan domestik yang mengatur tentang bantuan penagihan pajak. Per-42/PJ/2011 membatasi bantuan penagihan pajak untuk jenis pajak yang sudah diatur khusus dalam pasal bantuan penagihan pajak di P3B dan berlaku untuk penduduk dari negara pihak yang terikat P3B. Tindakan Bantuan penagihan pajak masih bersifat pemantauan pembayaran pajak, belum sampai pada tindakan penagihan aktif dikarenakan belum ada basis hukum untuk melegalkan penerbitan SKP atau instrumen legal lainnya sebagai dasar penagihan dalam rangka bantuan penagihan pajak.

---

This research discusses the formulation of the policy of assistance in the collecting of taxes based on Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement in Indonesia. The research objective is to analyze the formulation of the policy of assistance in the collecting of taxes based on Avoidanceof Double Taxation Agreement agreed upon by Indonesia government. This study used a qualitative approach to the type of descriptive research. The data was collected through in-depth interviews and the literature that comes from articles, books, legislation and other sources.

The study concluded that the assistance in the collection of taxes in P3B Indonesia and in the Multilateral Convention, the necessary domestic rules of assistance in the collection of taxes. Per-42/PJ/2011 restrict tax covered for types of taxes that have been specially arranged in article of asssistance in the collection of taxes in Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement and applies to residents of the state party is bound by Avoidance of Double Taxation Agreement. Action of assistance in the collection of taxes are still monitoring of tax payment, not to the active collection action because there is no legal basis for legalizing the issuance of tax assessment or other legal instruments as the basis in order to asistance in the collection of taxes."