Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tujuan utama dari penulisan studi ini adalah untuk melakukan pengujian mengenai hubungan simultan antara nilai perusahaan dengan praktek corporate governance dengan mengunakan sampel sebanyak 178 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini menemukan bukti bahwa praktek corporate governance dapat memengaruhi nilai perusahaan, tetapi nilai perusahaan tidak terbukti dapat memengaruhi praktek corporate governance. Lebih lanjut, terdapat bukti secara empiris bahwa tingkat profitabilitas juga dapat mempengaruhi nilai perusahaan sedangkan variabel yang dapat memengaruhi praktek corporate governance adalah ukuran perusahaan. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa perusahaan dengan jenis industri yang teregulasi , kepemilikan entitas oleh pemerintah dan kepemilikan entitas oleh pihak asing melakukan praktek corporate governance yang lebih baik.

---

The primary objective of this study is to test the simultaneous relationship between firm value and corporate governance practice on a sample of 178 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The study find that corporate governance practice affect the firm value, but there is no evidence that the firm value affect the corporate governance practice. Furher, there is an empirical evidence that the profitability rate can affect the firm value while variables that affect corporate governance practice are company size, This study also found that companies with regulated industry, government entity ownership and foreign entity ownership practice corporate government better."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengetahui pengaruh penghindaran pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan memasukkan peranan variabel moderasi tanggung jawab sosial dan tata kelola perusahaan. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 101 observasi perusahaan manufaktur tahun 2011 yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Analisis regresi berganda digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kinerja tanggung jawab sosial berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan sedangkan penghindaran pajak dan tata kelola perusahaan tidak berpengaruh. Sedangkan, kinerja tanggung jawab sosial dan tata kelola perusahaan sebagai variabel pemoderasi antara hubungan penghindaran pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan tidak dapat memoderasi kedua hubungan tersebut.

---

The objective of this study is to find out the impact of corporate social responsibility performance, corporate governance and tax avoidance in firm value. And the impact of tax avoidance toward firm value with corporate social responsibility performance and corporate governance as moderating variable. Sample of this study consist of 101 observation from manufacturing companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the hyphotesis in this research.

The result of this study shows corporate social responsibility performance has positive effect toward firm value, tax avoidance and corporate governance has no effect. And at the same time, performace corporate social responsibility and corporate governance as moderating variable in relationship between tax avoidance and firm value can?t moderate between that relationship."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan utama dari penulisan studi ini adalah untuk melakukan pengujian hubungan simultan antara aktivitas pengawasan dewan komisaris dan kinerja perusahaan dengan menggunakan sampel sebanyak 156 perusahaan. Penelitian ini menemukan bukti bahwa aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan, begitu juga sebaliknya, kinerja perusahaan dapat mempengaruhi aktivitas pengawasan perusahaan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris. Pengujian tambahan juga dilakukan terhadap 47 perusahaan untuk meneliti apakah hubungan simultan ini dimoderasi oleh nilai dari praktek corporate governance. Ditemukan bukti bahwa praktek corporate governance mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan, tetapi tidak mempengaruhi aktivitas pengawasan. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa jumlah kepemilikan keluarga, dan tingkat hutang mempengaruhi frekuensi aktivitas pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh dewan komisaris.

---

ABSTRACTThe primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner.;The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner.;The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner., The primary objective of this research is to test the simultaneous relationship between board of commisioner monitoring activity and firm performance on a sample that consist of 156 companies quoted in Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study found that monitoring activity that performed by board of comissioner affect the firm performance, and vice versa, firm performance also affect the monitoring activity. An additional test was performed with smaller sample of 47 companies to found the evidence that the score of corporate governance practice moderated the relationship between monitoring activity and firm performance. There is an empirical evidence that corporate governance affected the firm performance but do not affect the monitoring activity. Further this research found that family ownership and debt ratio of company affected the monitoring activity that performed by Board of Commissioner.]"

"Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan dari corporate governance terhadap biaya modal dan nilai perusahaan. Corporate governance merupakan seperangkat aturan yang mengatur relasi antara staekholders, pemerintah, pihak internal maupun eksternal, karyawan, dan manajemen yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban mereka. Proksi yang digunakan untuk variabel corporate governance adalah komisaris independen, board size, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan non-institusional Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap biaya modal dan nilai perusahaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah regresi data panel. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah non-keuangan yang tercatat di BEI pada periode tahun 2006-2016.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel dari corporate governance seperti, komisaris independen, boardsize, managerial ownership dan institusional ownership memiliki pengaruh secara signifikan terhadap biaya modal. Selain itu, hasil penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa variabel dari corporate governance seperti, boardsize, institusional ownership, dan non- institusional ownership berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan Tobins Q.

---

This study examines the use of corporate governance to the cost of capital and corporate value. Corporate governance is a set of rules which manages the relationships between stakeholders, government, internal and external parties, employees, and management that are related to their rights and obligations. The proxies used for corporate governance variables are independent commissioners, board size, managerial ownership, institutional ownership and non institutional ownership. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of corporate governance on the cost of capital and firm value. The research method used is panel data regression. The sample used in this study is non financial listed on the IDX in the period 2006 2016.The results of this study indicate that variables of corporate governance such as, independent commissioner, boardsize, managerial ownership and institutional ownership have a significant influence on capital costs. In addition, the results of this study also found that variables of corporate governance such as boardsize, institutional ownership, and non institutional ownership significantly influence the firm 39s value Tobin 39s Q."

"ABSTRAKTujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah menguji hubungan simultan antara nilaiperusahaan, praktek corporate govenance, dan struktur kepemilikan dengan 114perusahaan yang terbuka di Bursa Efek Jakarta pada tahun 2003. Variabel strukturkepemilikan adalah Cash flow rights, wedge (control rights - cash flow rights),persentase kepemilikan blockholders oleh pihak asing namun diduga sebenarnyaorang Indonesia (atau disingkat Asing Tapi Indonesia, (ASTINDO)). Nilai perusahaanakan diukur dengan proksi Tobin?s Q dan praktek corporate governance diukurdengan corporate governance index (CGI) yang dikembangkan oleh Arsjah (2005).Karena hubungan endogen antar variabel, metode two stage least squares dipakai. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa praktek corporate governance tidak berpengaruhsignifikan kepada nilai perusahaan, tetapi nilai perusahaan menjadi prediktor positifuntuk praktek corporate governance. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan yangmempunyai nilai perusahaan yang tinggi memilih praktek corporate governance yangbaik untuk meningkatkan nilai perusahaan. Namun, perusahaan belum tentu dapatmemberi signal tentang kualitas perusahaan dengan menerapkan praktek corporategovernance yang baik. Hasil ini mungkin terjadi karena implementasi praktekcorporate governance merupakan hal yang baru di indonesia dan karena pasar masihsulit mencerminkan pengaruh praktek corporate governance kepada nilai perusahaansebab kekurangan informasi yang memadai tentang praktek corporate governance. Ketika wedge perusahaan tinggi, pengaruh praktek corporate governance kepadanilai perusahaan melemah. 'Wedge adalah variabel yang mengukur insentif pemegangsaham mayoritas akhir untuk mengekspropriasi pemegang saham minoritas. Dengandemikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa efektivitas praktek corporate governancedipengaruhi oleh insentif untuk melakukan ekspropriasi dari pemegang sahampengendali akhir. Struktur kepemilikan dan nilai perusahaan tidak mempunyai hubungan sistematik.Hasil ini mendukung bahwa struktur kepemilikan ditentukan secara endogen,sehingga struktur kepemilikan tersebar maupun terkonsentrasi masing-masingmembawa masalah keagenan, tetapi sekaligus memberikan kuntungan yang dapatmenjadi kompensasi masalah keagenan masing-masing. ASTINDO dalam struktur kepemilikan perusahaan ternyata tidak menguranginilai perusahaan atau tidak mengekspropriasi kekayaan pemegang saham minoritas.Tetapi persentase kepemilikan ASTINDO berpengaruh negatif kepada praktekcorporate governance. Tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh dari kepemilikanASTINDO dan kepemilikan blockholders benar-benar asing (BLOCKA) kepada nilaiperusahaan dan praktek corporate goverance. Dengan asumsi ASTINDO diukur dengan benar, hasil tersebut meragukan argumen bahwa kepemilikan BLOCKA berpengaruh positif kepada kinerja perusahaan dan praktek corporate governance.

---

AbstractThe primary objective of this study is to test simultaneous relationships among thevalue of the firm, the practice of corporate govemanee, and the ownership structure ona sample of 114 companies quoted in the Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX) for the year 2003. The ovmership structure variables include cash flow rights, wedge (controlrights - cash-flow rights), and percent of ownership by foreign bloclcholders that presumably are Indonesian blockholders (FBIB). The value of the firm is measured byproxy of Tobin's Q and the practice of corporate governance is measured by corporategovemance index (CGI) developed by Arsjah (2005). Because of the endogeneity among the variables, the two stage least squares are employed.The study finds that practice of corporate govemance fails to affect value of thefirm, but value of the firm is a positive predictor of practice of corporate governance.These results suggest that highly valued firms adopt the practice of the good corporategovemance because they believe that the practice of the good corporate governancewill further raise fimr value. However, adopting the practice of good corporate governance may not translate to higher fimi value. This may due to the fact thatimplementation of the practice of the corporate govemance is something new in Indonesia and that market may have difficulty in reflecting the effects of the practice ofthecorporategovemanceonthevalueofthefirmbecauseofthelackofproper information.Further, the influence ofthe practice ofthe corporate governance on the value ofthe firm becomes less, when the wedge of the firm becomes higher. Wedge is the variable that estimates incentives of ultimate majority shareholders to expropriate minority shareholders. Therefore, I conclude that effectiveness of the practice of the corporate govemance is influenced by the expropriation incentives of the ultimate majority shareholders.Ownership structure and the value of the firm have no systematic relation. This result supports that the ownership structure of a firm is the endogenous outcome of decisions. In other words, ownership structure is chosen so as to maximize the value ofthe firm, and that greater diffuseness in ownership, although it makes the agencyproblemmoresevere,conveyscompensatingadvantagesonfirmsthatchoosetorelyon a difiiise ownership structure.FBIB does not extract private benefits for themselves or do not expropriate thewealth of the minority shareholders. But, percent of ownership by FBIB has negative effectsonthepracticeofthecorporategovernance.Thereisno differencebetweentheinfluence of percent of ownership by foreign bloekholders and of percent of ownership by PBIB on the value of the firm and the practice of the corporate governance.Assuming that percent of ownership by FBIB are accurately measured, this result casts some doubt on the argument that ownership by foreign bloclcholders has positive effects on the performance and the practice of the corporate governance."

"ABSTRAKTujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk meneliti hubungan empiris antara Strategic corporate social responsibility (Strategic CSR), Corporate Governance (CG), dan kinerja perusahaan dengan menguji hubungan timbal balik diantara ketiganya. Untuk memperoleh hasil yang lebih komprehensif, variabel CSR yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari Strategic CSR, Non Strategic CSR, dan CSR sebagai suatu keseluruhan. Menggunakan uji two stage least square (2SLS), hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme CG berpengaruh positif terhadap aktivitas CSR, Non Strategic CSR dan kinerja perusahaan (baik ROA maupun PBV), CSR dan Non Strategic CSR berpengaruh positif terhadap ROA, sedangkan CSR, Strategic dan Non Strategic CSR berpengaruh positif terhadap PBV. Aktivitas Strategic CSR perusahaan berpengaruh signifikan dalam meningkatkan PBV perusahaan. Hasil penelitian ini mendukung social impact hypothesis, agency theory, dan conflict resolution theory.

---

ABSTRACTThe primary objective of this study is to examine the empirical association among Strategic corporate social responsibility (Strategic CSR), Corporate Governance (CG), and firm performance by investigating their causal effects. For getting more comprehensive result, CSR variables in this study consist of Strategic CSR, Non Strategic CSR and CSR a whole. Using the two stage least square (2SLS) method, the results show that CG mechanism positively influence CSR, Non Strategic CSR and firm performance (both ROA and PBV), CSR and Non Strategic CSR positively influence ROA, while CSR, Strategic dan Non Strategic CSR positively influence PBV. Firms‟ Strategic CSR engagement plays a significantly positive role in enhancing PBV. The results support social impact hypothesis, agency theory, and conflict resolution theory"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap cash holdings dan firm value. Penelitian ini menggunakan uji analisis Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah cash holdings yang diproksikan dengan logaritma natural dari total kas pada penutupan akhir tahun dan firm value yang diproksikan dengan perhitungan Tobin's Q. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 1314 observasi dari sampel perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007-2012.Hasil peneltian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ukuran dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (2) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (3) ukuran dewan direksi tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value, (4) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on cash holdings and firm value. This research is analyze with Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The Independence variables in this research are the board size, board independence, and insider ownership, for the dependent variables are cash holdings that proxied by log of year end total cash and firm value that proxied by Tobin's Q. This study use a panel data sample of 1314 observations listed non financial firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periode 2007-2012.

The results showed that: (1) board size have significant effect on cash holdings, (2) board independence and insider ownership doesn't have significant effect on cash holdings, (3) board size doesn't have significant effect on firm value, (4) board independence and insider ownership have significant effect on firm value."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara corporate governance ratings terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang diukur dengan menggunakan lima macam proksi, yaitu Tobin?s Q, MtS, MtB, RoA, dan RoE. Penelitian ini memiliki dua tahap persamaan dengan tujuan untuk mengontrol faktor endoginitas pada pengujian. Model regresi yang digunakan adalah regresi simultan 2SLS.Hasilnya, didapatkan hasil bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara corporate governance ratings terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang diukur dengan menggunakan Tobin's Q, MtS, dan MtB; namun tidak ditemukan pengaruh yang signifikan antara corporate governance ratings terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang diukur dengan menggunakan RoA dan RoE. Penelitian ini juga memperhitungkan faktor market value of equity, usia perusahaan, pertumbuhan perusahaan, leverage, konsentrasi kepemilikan perusahaan, rasio intensitas modal dan negative net income.

---

This research aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance ratings to company performance listed in Corporate Governance Perception Index in Indonesia Stock from 2010 to 2014. Company performance is measured by five proxies: Tobin's Q, MtS, MtB, RoA, and RoE. This research has two steps of equation in order to control for its endoginity. 2SLS regression is used in this research.

The result shows that corporate governance ratings significantly affects company performance measured by Tobin's Q, MtS, and MtB, but not for RoA and RoE. This research also considers several factors, which are market value of equity, company's age, growth, leverage, ownership concentration, capital-intensity ratio, and negative net income which become control variables for this research."

"ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan terhadap persentase kepemilikan asing di perusahaan Indonesia. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya pengaruh kepemilikan asing terhadap tata kelola perusahaan di Indonesia. Model penelitian melihat hubungan antara variabel endogen kepemilikan asing dan tata kelola perusahaan dengan variabel eksogen berupa kepemilikan keluarga, kepemilikan institusional domestik, ukuran perusahaan, nilai perusahaan, likuiditas saham, dividend yield, dan kinerja perusahaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan asing dan tata kelola perusahaan tidak berhubungan secara signifikan.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to investigate the effects of corporate governance to foreign invesment in Indonesian public listed company. Moreover, this research also aim to investigate whether foreign investment effects corporate governance practice in the company. The research model is developed to investigate the relationship between the endogenous variables, foreign investment and corporate governance, with exogenous variables that consist of family ownership, domestic institutional ownership, firm size, firm value, stock liquidity, dividend yield, and return on asset. The result shows that there is no significant relationship between foreign ownership and corporate governance."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja perusahaan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2010 hingga 2016. Komponen corporate governance yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu dewan direksi, dewan direksi independen, dewan komisaris, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan asing, dengan ukuran perusahaan, umur perusahaan dan leverage sebagai variabel kontrol. Sedangakan untuk mengukur kinerja perusahaan yaitu menggunakan (Return on Asset) ROA, (Return on Equity) ROE, (Net Profit Margin) NPM, (Stock Return) SR dan Tobin’s Q. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa dewan direksi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun dewan direksi berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap ROA dan SR. Dewan Komisaris berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Direktur Independen berpengaruh signifikan ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Komisaris Independen berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap ROA, Tobins’ Q dan SR, namun Komisaris Independen berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROE dan NPM. Kepemilikan Manager signifikan terhadap terhadap ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Kepemilikan Institusional berpengaruh signifikan terhadap terhadap ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Kepemilikan Asing berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROA, ROE dan NPM, namun Kepemilikan Asing berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap Tobin’s Q dan SR.

---

This study aims to examine empirically the effect of corporate governance on the firm performance in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2010 to 2016. Dependent variable used in this study are board of directors, independent board of directors, board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, foreign ownership, company size, company age and leverage as control variables. While the components used to measure the performance of the company as an independent variable that is (Return on Assets) ROA, Return on Equity ROE, (Net Profit Margin) NPM, (Stock Return) SR and Tobin's Q. The results of this study found that the board of directors had a significant effect on ROE, NPM and Tobin's Q, but the board of directors had no significant effect on ROA and SR. The Board of Commissioners has a significant effect on ROA, ROE, NPM and Tobin's Q, but not significant to SR. Independent