Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKDari total penerimaan negara dari sektor pajak, yang memberikan kontribusi terbesar setelah pajak penghasilan, adalah pajak pertambahan nilai (PPN). Kontribusi penerimaan PPN adalah sebesar 30% dari total penerimaan pajak non-migas. Dalam Undang-Undang PPN 1983 yang berlaku pada 1 Januari 1985 sampai sekarang yaitu dengan pemberlakuan Undang-Undang nomor 18 Tahun 2000, pemungutan PPN dan pajak penjualan atas barang mewah (PPn BM) di Indonesia menggunakan sistem faktur. Dengan sistem ini, maka pada setiap transaksi yang menjadi objek PPN dan PPn BM, keabsahan pemungutan PPN dan PPn BM-nya ditandai dengan penerbitan faktur pajak. Tanpa adanya faktur pajak, maka penjual dapat dianggap belum melaksanakan tugasnya untuk memungut PPN dan di sisi lain pembeli dapat dianggap belum membayar PPN. Jadi sangat jelas betapa pentingnya arti selembar faktur pajak baik bagi penjual maupun pembeli. Untuk mendorong ekspor yang dilakukan oleh pengusaha kena pajak, pemerintah memberikan banyak insentif, diantaranya kebijakan restitusi pajak yaitu bahwa atas ekspor barang tersebut dikenakan PPN (pajak keluaran) dengan tarif pajak sebesar 0% (nol persen). Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan (KUP) mengatur jangka waktu penyelesaian permohonan pengembalian kelebihan pembayaran pajak (restitusi) paling lambat 12 bulan. Namun dalam rangka melaksanakan kebijakan pemerintah untuk mendorong ekspor dan memberikan pelayanan prima kepada wajib pajak, maka terhadap wajib pajak yang melakukan ekspor diberikan insentif berupa kemudahan dan percepatan penyelesaian restitusi PPN menjadi paling lambat 2 bulan sejak saat diterimanya permohonan. Namun kemudahan dan percepatan penyelesaian restitusi PPN disalah gunakan oleh beberapa pengusaha dan fiskus. Bertitik tolak dari masalah ini, dilakukan penelitian untuk mengetahui penyebab terjadinya faktur bermasalah. Penelitian berdasarkan analisis hasil wawancara dengan informan kunci dan beberapa informan lainnya yang terdiri dari pakar perpajakan dan pejabat dan mantan pejabat Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, terungkap 22 model modus operandi faktur pajak bermasalah. Dari model-model ini dapat diperlihatkan bahwa faktur pajak bermasalah bukan saja terjadi pada transaksi ekspor, namun juga terjadi pada penyerahan BKP dalam negeri, terutama pada transaksi-transaksi yang melibatkan pengusaha-pengusaha bukan pengusaha kena pajak. Ada 4 penyebab utama terjadinya faktur pajak bermasalah. Pertama, sistem PPN dimana dengan mekanisme pengkreditan pajak masukan dengan pajak keluaran yang kompleks dan kemudahan untuk melakukan restitusi PPN terutama bagi pengusaha eksportir. Ke dua, administrasi pajak yang lemah sehingga pengukuhan sebagai pengusaha kena pajak dilakukan tanpa seleksi yang memadai. Ke tiga, pemeriksaan adalah untuk meyakinkan bahwa wajib pajak patuh terhadap undang-undang dan peraturan perpajakan dalam suatu sistem self-assessment, namun pemeriksaan ini tidak diawasi dengan ketat oleh atasan, karena Direktorat Jenderal pajak hanya menekankan pada target penerimaan. Terakhir, budaya masyarakat mendorong untuk melakukan penyimpangan. Bila seseorang tidak dapat melakukan kebohongan terhadap orang lain, orang tersebut merasa tidak puas. Ini yang merupakan penyebab terjadinya kolusi antara wajib pajak dengan fiskus yang digambarkan dengan peta corruption. Untuk mengantisipasi kasus-kasus faktur pajak bermasalah, Pemerintah telah mengeluarkan beberapa peraturan dan surat edaran. Salah satunya adalah Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak nomor PER-124/PJ/2006 tanggal 22 Agustus 2006 yang berisi tentang pelaksanaan analisis risiko dalam rangka pemeriksaan atas pengajuan restitusi PPN. Dengan analisis risiko, wajib pajak yang mengajukan restitusi PPN akan memperoleh kepastian hukum dan pengembalian restitusinya menjadi lebih cepat, yang berarti membantu cashflow wajib pajak. Sebagai perbandingan, di negara People?s Republic of China (PRC) sudah diterapkan PPN sejak awal tahun 1994. Dalam menghadapi faktur pajak bermasalah, pemerintah PRC telah menjalankan beberapa cara, antara lain dengan memperbaiki perangkat administrasi perpajakannya dalam bentuk pembangunan sistem monitoring perpajakan yang terkomputerisasi dan pengenaan hukuman yang lebih berat berupa hukuman mati.

---

ABSTRACTVAT is the second major source of fiscal revenue for the government, after revenue from income tax. The VAT revenue contribution accounts for 30% from the total non-oil and gas fiscal revenue. In 1983 VAT Law that put into effect on 1st January, 1985 which has been changed with VAT Law number 18 2000, VAT collection and sales tax on luxury goods in Indonesia use invoice tax system. By using the system, on every transaction which is object of VAT and sales tax on luxury goods, the collection validity is indicated by the issue of tax invoice. Without tax invoice, the seller can be assumed not doing his job to collect VAT and on the other side the buyer can be assumed not paying VAT. Then it is very clear how important the meaning of a piece of tax invoice for a seller and a buyer. To drive export which is carried out by taxable person, the government gives a lot of insentives, among others, tax refund policy i.e. on export of the goods is imposed output VAT with tax rate of 0%. The Law of General Stipulations and Administration of Taxation regulate the period of time for VAT refund application settlement at the latest of 12 months. However in related with the government policy to drive export and to give excellent services to the tax payers, then for the tax payers who carry out export will receive insentives in the forms of ease and simple and speeding up for VAT refund settlement at the latest of 2 months after receiving the VAT refund application. The ease and simple and speeding up of VAT refund has been abused by some business men and tax officers. From the above starting point, carried out the research to understand the causal factor of the case of tax invoices fraud.The research which is based on the analysis of interview results with the key informants and the other informants who are consisted of tax experts and tax officers and former tax officers of Directorate General of Tax, is uncovered of 22 models of modus of operation of tax invoice fraud. From the models, are shown that the fake tax invoices are not only happened in export transactions, but also in the transfer of the domestic taxable goods, especially in the transactions which involve non taxable persons. There are 4 main causes for the tax invoice fraud case. First, VAT system with complexity in credit mechanism between input tax and output tax and ease and simple to conduct VAT refund, especially for exportir business men. Second, tax administration is relatively poor, so that affirmation as a taxable person is conducted without proper procedural selection.. Third, auditing is a type of control to ascertain that the tax payer obeys to the tax law and regulations in a self-assessment system. However the auditing is not controlled tightly by the supervisor in tax office, because Directorate General of Tax emphasizes only on the revenue target. Fourth, the culture of society stimulates to do deviation from normal things. If a person can not do a falsehood to other persons, the person feels unsatisfied. It causes the collusion between tax payer and tax officer that is described in corruption map. To anticipate the cases of tax invoice fraud, the government has issued several regulations and circulation letters. Among others is Regulation of Director General of Tax number PER-124/PJ/2006 dated 22nd August 2006 which contains about carrying out risk analysis in related with auditing on VAT refund application. Using the risk analysis, tax payer who apply for the VAT refund will get a legal certainty and faster tax refund settlement. It means that it will help the cash flow of tax payer. As a comparative study, in People?s Republic of China (PRC) has been implemented VAT since the beginning of 1994. To enhance control against the tax invoice fraud, the Government of PRC has made concrete efforts to upgrade the tools of tax administration. Along with increasing tax audits and expanding penalty on tax frauds and evasion, great resources have been spent to build up a computerized taxation monitoring system. As a result, the calculation, deduction and refunds for VAT will be conducted on a more accurate and timely basis, while VAT frauds and tax evasions can be detected and penalized in a more effective manner."

"Saat ini, Pemerintah ingin meningkatkan fungsi cukai sebagai penerimaan dan pengatur barang konsumsi, untuk mewujudkannya dengan memperluas barang kena cukai pada minuman ringan berkarbonasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar pertimbangan, upaya pemerintah dan potensi penerimaan dari ekstensifikasi barang kena cukai pada minuman ringan berkarbonasi. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa ekstensifikasi barang kena cukai pada minuman ringan berkarbonasi didasarkan pada pemenuhan sifat atau karakteristik barang kena cukai yang diatur dalam UU No. 39 Tahun 2007 terhadap minuman ringan berkarbonasi, yaitu barang yang konsumsinya harus dibatasi, peredarannya harus diawasi, barang yang penggunaannya menimbulkan dampak negatif terhadap kesehatan masyarakat dan lingkungan serta barang yang pemakaiannya perlu pembebanan pungutan negara demi keadilan dan keseimbangan. Upaya yang dilakukan pemerintah yaitu revisi Undang-Undang Cukai, melakukan kajian mendalam, sosialisasi internal dan menciptakan sumber daya manusia yang handal. Ekstensifikasi barang kena cukai pada minuman ringan berkarbonasi dapat meningkatkan penerimaan negara dan peningkatan program kesehatan masyarakat.

---

This moment, Government wants to increase excise tax function as consumer goods revenue and regulator, to realize it by expanding excise goods on carbonated soft drinks. This research was carried out to learn consideration base, government's efforts and revenue potential from extensification of excise goods on carbonated soft drinks. In this research then discovered that extensification excise goods on carbonated soft drinks is based on fulfillment of characteristic excise goods that arranged inside UU No 39 Tahun 2007 toward carbonated soft drinks that says consumption on goods have to be bordered, circulation have to be controlled, used on goods which gives negative effect to community's health and surrounding along with goods whose use needs tax levied for the sake of justice and balance. Efforts which have been done by the government are revision of excise tax law, profound studies, internal socialization and creation of sophisticated human resource. Extensification excise goods on carbonated soft drinks can increase country's revenue and escalation of public health program."

"Saat ini, Pemerintah ingin meningkatkan fungsi cukai sebagai penerimaan dan pengatur barang konsumsi, untuk mewujudkannya dengan memperluas barang kena cukai pada pulsa yang beralasan pola konsumsi telepon seluler yang tinggi dan berakibat gangguan kesehatan pada masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar pertimbangannya, analisis formulasi kebijakan serta dampak yang akan terjadi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa ekstensifikasi barang kena cukai di industri telekomunikasi lebih cocok dikenakan ke telepon seluler daripada pulsa. Tahapan formulasi kebijakan ini juga belum sempurna dan dampak yang dihasilkan di industri telekomunikasi lebih kepada perubahan struktur harga.

---

Currently, the Government is looking to increase excise tax function as consumer goods revenue and regulator, and to realize it by expanding excise goods on cellular phone credits due to the high amount of consumers of cellular phones, causing health problems to the population. The purpose of this research is to find out the basis of the consideration, policy formulation and analysis of the impact will occur. This research is qualitative descriptive interpretive.

This research has found that the extensification excise goods on the telecommunication industry would be more suitable to be applied to the cellular phones than celluler phones credit. The steps of formulation for this policy has not yet been perfected and the effect that has resulted in the telecommunication industry has been more to the changes of price structure."

"Under the Value Added Tax (VAT) system, the validity of the collection is indicated by the issue of tax-invoice. Without tax-invoice, the taxable firm can be assumed not doing their obligation to collect VAT,whereas the buyer may be regarded as not paying VAT. The invoice is very important for the VAT mechanism. Zero-rate on export facilitates the exporters to claim refund on some input taxes. However, the ease and simplicity of VAT refund has been abused by taxable firms and non taxable firms with the aid of tax officers. This study is aimed to analyze the causal factors of the case of tax-invoice fraud. The study is based on the analysis of interview results with the key informants. There are at least 22 models of tax-invoice fraud occurred on exports. Four main causes for the tax-invoice fraud: (1) the complexity in credit mechanism, (2) poor tax administration, (3) lack of tax audit, and (4) the culture of society. To anticipate the cases of tax-invoice fraud, the government has issued several regulations and circulated letters, including carried out risk analysis in connection with the auditing on VAT refun"

"Indonesia since 1984 carried out taxation reform which one ofthem was the enacting of the value added taxation law. As for the concept of the value added taxation law that is applied, Indonesia follows the Subtractive Indirect Method/Invoice Method/Credit Method. It is called as a subtractive indirect method because its counting is no longer based on bookkeeping or the note but is based on the invoice, so as to be mentioned also the invoice method.So each transaction of the handing over the taxable goods andservices by a taxable entrepreneur, according to the article number 13 point (1) in the Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 8 concerning value added tax on goods and services and sales tax on luxury goods as lastly amended by Law Number 18 of 2000, is obliged to make a tax Invoice for that each of handing over the taxable goods and services. The tax invoice here as adopted proof the tax, this also functioned as one of the supporting implements of the transaction.The tax dispute emerged because of the testing physically on thecondition for the tax invoice, has been in accordance with that wasrequired in the article number 13 point (5) of the value added taxation law. So as for the buyer who accepted the tax Invoice, where its condition is not in accordance with he article number 13 point (5) of the value added taxation law will suffer as a result. This tax dispute that more was known or was often acknowledged with the tax invoice term as incomplete or defect. The subject of the problem in this thesis was first: In condition of incomplete or defect tax invoice being found when the taxpayers being audited by the tax office which one is the responsible the buyer or the seller , second: What is analysis from the Indonesia Tax Tribunal decision in the dispute of the incomplete or defect tax invoice and the effect of its desicion to the state.The aim of this writing is to analyze the incomplete or defect taxinvoice which is not in accordance with the provisions that were arranged in the value added taxation law, and the method utilized in this writing is the descriptive analysis method.Starting from the inspection to the tax tribunal decision, thedispute of the incomplete or defect tax invoice has result in the differences of opinion toward the implementation of the value added taxation law. So, what has been done by the inspector, it has not reflected the working efficiency. Because in responding to the problem of the incomplete or defect tax invoice respectively, each has difference view in the settlement and decisions, whereas the value added taxation law remain unchanged. Thus, a scientific investigation must be done to solve this matter. By considering the decision of the Indonesia Tax Tribunal, the problem of the incomplete or defect tax invoice must be carried out by analyzing the assessment or the definition itself, that is in the application of sanctions for the buyer which is not only from the aspect of formal justice, but also from its material aspect. The suggestion in this thesis are in the application of the rule linked with the condition for the tax Invoice could be maintained, as to anticipate or to face the incomplete or defect tax invoice, but in sanctions for the buyer must be conceded by the investigation, because sanctions that are accepted by the buyer are bigger compared with the seller/the publisher of the tax Invoice."

"Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) atas pengalihan aktiva yang menurut tujuan semula tidak untuk diperjualbelikan (Pasal 16 D) merupakan isu PPN yang sering kali menjadi suatu problema di dalam penyelenggaraan sistem kebijakan PPN di Indonesia. Dari problema tersebut menunjukkan betapa rawannya kebijakan PPN Pasal 16 D. Adanya pengecualian pada pasal 9 ayat 8 huruf b banyak menimbulkan dispute di lapangan antara sudut pandang fiskus dengan Pengusaha Kena Pajak, munculnya skema re ekspor serta kendala teknis dalam pelaksanaan Law Enforcement di lapangan memberikan tanda bahwa kebijakan tersebut harus dilakukan penelitian.Adapun tujuan penelitian yang menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif ini adalah pertama menganalisis alasan penyerahan aktiva yang menurut tujuan semula tidak untuk diperjualbelikan menjadi obyek PPN dalam rezim UU No. 11 Tahun 1994, kedua menganalisis dasar pemikiran perubahan kebijakan PPN 16 D dalam rezim UU No. 42 Tahun 2009, ketiga, menganalisis pelaksanaan Law Enforcement kebijakan PPN 16 D pada perusahaan garment di KPP PMA Empat, dan keempat mendesain kebijakan PPN atas penyerahan aktiva yang ideal berdasar prinsip yang direkomendasikan AICPA?Dari hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan PPN Pasal 16 D saat ini perlu didesain ulang sehingga memenuhi prinsip-prinsip Simplicity, Certainty dan Neutrality dengan syarat pemberlakuannya adalah sepanjang Pajak Masukan saat diperoleh ?telah? dikreditkan untuk menghindari adanya hidden subsidy dan perlunya dibuatkan aturan pelaksanaan atas kebijakan tersebut sehingga dispute dan agressive tax planning di lapangan dapat diminimalisir.

---

VAT on transfer assets which is not for sale at first time it purchased (Article 16 D) is the most frequent problem in the VAT policy system in Indonesia. It shows that VAT on transfer asset is a prone policy. The exception article 9 (8) b of VAT policy on transfer asset caused different interpretation between tax oficer and taxable person, re export scheme and technical constraint has signed that VAT on transfer asset policy must be researched.

The objective of this thesis are: first, to analyze why transfer asset is to be taxable supplies, second, what is the rationale or inside of VAT policy on transfer asset regime VAT Tax Law 42/ 2009, third, how does this policy implemented in the garment enterprises at the foreign investment tax office four, fourth, how does the good VAT policy on transfer asset design which recommended by AICPA, especially Simplicity, Certainty and Neutrality principle on which most important in making tax policy. This research is qualitative research with descriptive analysis.

The researh result shows that VAT on transfer asset which is not for sale at first time it purchased ( article 16 D) need to be redesigned by policy maker which is always keep Simplicity, Certainty and Neutrality principles with absolute requirement as long as VAT input when its purchased is allowed to be credited to avoid the hidden subsidy and need to make implementing regulation in order to minimizing dispute and agressive tax planning."

"Penelitian tentang analisis formulasi kebijakan atas penetapan Nilai Jual Objek Pajak Tidak Kena Pajak Bumi Bangunan dalam Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 67/PMK.03/2011 bertujuan untuk mengetahui perumusan kebijakan mulai dari tahap penyusunan, agenda, hingga tahap formulasi kebijakan. Kebijakan ini dibuat dalam rangka menyesuaikan NJOPTKP PBB dengan perkembangan ekonomi, moneter dan harga umum objek pajak. Penelitian ini juga ditujukan untuk mengetahui faktor yang menjadi dasar penetapan NJOPTKP PBB, dengan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif dan metode pengumpulan data kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam. Peneliti menemukan nilai penghitungan wajar dan inflasi yang menjadi faktor utama dalam kenaikan NJOPTKP PBB. Dengan demikian diharapkan pemerintah menetapkan besarnya NJOPTKP PBB secara berkala dengan mempergunakan nilai penghitungan wajar.

---

Researh on policy formulation analysis of property tax exemption (Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 67/PMK.03/2011) is to find out policy formulation, starting from preparation stage, agenda setting, up to policy formulation. The research was made to adjust property tax exemption with economic development, monetary, and value of tax object. This research also to find out the factors of property tax exemption establishment, using qualitative approach and qualitative data with indeep interview. Researcher find out fair value, and conclude that inflation is the main factor on determining property tax exemption. Therefore, the goverment be expected to determine property tax exemption periodically, using fair value."

"Menggunakan bunching estimation dan data SPT dari DJP, diketahui pada periode 2011-2013 ada perilaku bunching, yaitu perilaku menahan omzet, yang signifikan di area sekitar batasan PKP Rp. 600 juta. Akan tetapi pada periode 2014-2016 tidak ada bunching pada area yang sama. Respons bunching menunjukkan batasan PKP justru menjadi penghalang pertumbuhan usaha. Menggunakan analisis level perusahaan, wajib pajak dengan status hukum Persekutuan & Firma dan sektor usaha Transportasi dan Pergudangan memiliki probabilitas tertinggi untuk melakukan bunching. Probabilitas melakukan bunching dengan cara underreporting omzet tertinggi ada pada karakteristik wajib pajak dengan status hukum Yayasan dan sektor usaha perdagangan. Pada area sekitar Rp. 4,8 Miliar tidak ada bunching terhadap batasan PKP, justru yang ada fenomena negative bunching, yaitu wajib pajak memilih untuk memiliki omzet diatas batasan. Hal ini dikarenakan ada kebijakan lain yang berpengaruh pada area yang sama yaitu kebijakan tarif pajak flat 1% dari omzet.

---

Using bunching estimation and data from tax return in Directorate General of Taxes, it is known there is significant bunching behavior, holding it's sales, in the area around threshold Rp. 600 million, but in the period 2014-2016 there is no bunching in the same area. The bunching response shows that the VAT threshold is actually a barrier to business growth. Using company-level analysis, taxpayers with legal status "Persekutuan & Firma" and in Transportation and Warehousing sector have the highest probability of bunching. The highest probability of doing bunching by underreporting is on the characteristics of the taxpayer with the legal status "yayasan" and in trade sector. In the area around Rp. 4.8 Billion there is no bunching at VAT threshold, at this point there is negative bunching phenomenon, the taxpayer chooses to have sales above the limit. This is because there are other policies that affect the same area that is tax rate policy flat 1% of sales rather than profit."

"Penurunan produksi minyak dan stagnannya produksi gas selama beberapa tahun terakhir, menimbulkan kerugian yang cukup besar bagi pemerintah. Berdasarkan keluhan kontraktor, salah satu penyebabnya adalah pengenaan berbagai macam pajak sejak awal tahap eksplorasi. Padahal, di sisi lain, kontraktor belum memperoleh penghasilan usaha pada tahap ini. Untuk meningkatkan produksi migas tersebut, diterbitkanlah Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 178/PMK.11/2007 yang mengatur pemberian insentif PPN ditanggung pemerintah bagi impor barang yang dipergunakan dalam tahap eksplorasi migas. Proses implementasi kebijakan inilah yang ingin dibahas oleh peneliti suatu penelitian. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis yang bersifat deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses pelaksanaan pemberian insentif PPN ditanggung pemerintah bagi impor barang untuk eksplorasi migas mencakup suatu tahapan implementasi yang cukup panjang dan melibatkan beberapa institusi negara. Pada dasarnya proses pelaksanaan sudah dimulai sejak pengajuan Rencana Impor Barang oleh kontraktor yang merupakan dokumen yang wajib dilampirkan ketika mengajukan permohonan insentif hingga penyampaian laporan triwulan PPN ditanggung pemerintah kepada Direktur Jenderal Bea dan Cukai, dan permintaan pembayaran penerimaan PPN oleh Direktur Jenderal Pajak kepada Direktur Jenderal Anggaran. Konsekuensinya, pemerintah harus menganggarkan tambahan pengeluaran untuh menanggung PPN tersebut dalam APBN 2008. Namun, pengeluaran ini secara langsung akan diseimbangkan dengan masuknya penerimaan PPN. Dengan demikian, pada dasarnya tidak ada dana belanja yang secara riil dikeluarkan pemerintah untuk menanggung PPN tersebut. Namun demikian, kontraktor hanya dapat menerima manfaat insentif tersebut selama satu tahun karena Undang-Undang APBN 2008 yang menjadi dasar hukumnya hanya memiliki masa berlaku selama satu tahun.

---

The declining of oil production and stagnancy of gas for many years have resulted in government loss. Based on the demand ask by Contractors, the taxes imposed since the beginning of exploration phase have become one of the main cause. In the other side, no income has been generated by Contractors in this phase. In order to increase the national production, government issued a tax incentive in the form of VAT borne by government for the importation of exploration goods in oil and gas sector which is regulated in Minister of Finance Regulation Number 178/PMK.011/2007. This research attempts to analyze the implementation process of this regulation in details. The approach used in the research is based on qualitative method with descriptive interpretation. From the research held, it shows that the implementation of encompass such a long process and involve some government institutions. The process has been started since Contractors submit the Import Plan, until recording tax revenue by Directorate General of Taxation based on the report delivered by Directorate General of Custom Duty and admitting subsidy expenditure by Directorate of Budgeting. This creates government obligation to budgeted additional expense to bear the VAT in General Revenue and Expenditure Budget for Year 2008. However, this expense will directly balance with the tax revenue from VAT. Thereby, there is no real expenditure by government in bearing the VAT. Nevertheless, Contractors are only able to get benefit from the incentive for one year since The General Revenue and Expenditure Budget Law valid only for one year."