Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Politik pangan Indonesia tertuang dalam UU No.7 tahun 1996 tentang pangan. Pencapaian politik pangan diukur lewat konsep ketahanan pangan. Konsep ini diadopsi ternyata tidak mampu mengatasi masalah kelaparan. Konsep ketahanan pangan yang tidak mempersoalkan siapa yang memproduksi, dari mana produksi pangan, dan bagaimana pangan diproduksi kemudian jadi "kuda troya" kapitalisasi sisitem pembangunan pangan dunia yang didesain oleh negara-negara utara.Hasilnya, sistem pertanian negara-negara selatan hancur.Kondisi ini melahirkan konsep tandingan: kedaulatan pangan. Berbeda dengan ketahanan pangan yang teknis, kedaulatan pangan adalah konsep politik. Ada perbedaan mendasar antara ketahanan pangan dengan kedaulatan pangan: model produksi pertanian industri VS agroekologis dan multikultur; pasar bebas VS proteksionis dan lokal; memakai instrumen WTO vs International Planning committee for food sovereignty; memuja paten vs anti paten dan komunal; dan wacana economic rationalism vs green rationalism. Jadi, diverfikasi pangan hanya bagian kecil untuk menggapai kedaulatan pangan. Diversifikasi pangan dirintis sejak 1960-an, tetapi hasilnya belum memuaskan. Hal pola konsumsi dan produksi/ketersediaan pangan tidak seimbang, inefisiensi sisitem distribusi dan liberalisasi pasar pangan. Dibandingkan negara-negara Asia, Indonesia memiliki daya dukung lahan cukup baik. Untuk memperkuat diversifikasi pangan harus dipastikan SD ada di bawah kontrol petani/komunitas untuk memproduksi aneka pangan sesuai kondisi lokal, mendahulukan pangan yang bisa diproduksi sendiri daripada impor, mengolah pangan lokal menjadi tepung, mengubah kebijakan diversifikasi pangan yang tidak konsisten, merancang ulang pasar pangan, dan menjaga konsisitensi kebijakan."

"The objective of the research is to analysis the role of female in food diversification effort in order to reach food security that is affected by householder in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) Indonesia. We focused in role of female household level because female is the decision maker to choose and serve the food household consumption..."

"[Dengan menggunakan data Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) periodetahun 2000 dan 2007, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak dariprogram subsidi beras untuk orang miskin (Raskin) terhadap kesehatan anakIndonesia. Indikator kesehatan yang menjadi fokus dalam penelitian ini adalahtinggi dan berat badan anak yang telah dinormalisasi dengan umur masing-masinganak, atau dikenal dengan istilah height-for-age dan weight-for-age. Sebagaikontrol variable, penelitian ini juga menggunakan karakteristik anak, orang tua danrumah tangga. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah program Raskin berpengaruh positifterhadap tinggi badan anak yang berasal dari keluarga penerima Raskin. Akantetapi, penelitian ini tidak menemukan cukup bukti tentang manfaat program Raskinterhadap berat badan anak. Hasil penting lainnya dari penelitian ini adalah, dalamjangka panjang, status gizi anak yang berasal dari keluarga penerima Raskin tidakberbeda dengan mereka yang tidak menerima Raskin. Penelitian ini menemukanbahwa manfaat dari program Raskin yang diberikan di masa lampau, tidak lagiberpengaruh pada kesehatan anak setelah tujuh tahun kemudian;Using two waves of Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) collected in 2000and 2007, this paper examines the impact of the Indonesian food subsidies (Raskin)program in improving child health. In this paper, the health status of children isindicated by standardized height (height-for-age) and weight (weight-for-age)anthropometric measures (called as Z-score). As control variables, this study alsouses children, parents and households characteristics. The finding of this study isthat the Raskin program positively affects height of children living in eligiblehouseholds. On the other hand, there is not enough econometric evidence about theimpact of the Raskin program on child weight. Another important evidence foundby this study is that the nutritional status of children with and without the Raskinprogram is not different in the long term. It has been found that the Raskin programin the past has no impact on child health seven years later.;Using two waves of Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) collected in 2000and 2007, this paper examines the impact of the Indonesian food subsidies (Raskin)program in improving child health. In this paper, the health status of children isindicated by standardized height (height-for-age) and weight (weight-for-age)anthropometric measures (called as Z-score). As control variables, this study alsouses children, parents and households characteristics. The finding of this study isthat the Raskin program positively affects height of children living in eligiblehouseholds. On the other hand, there is not enough econometric evidence about theimpact of the Raskin program on child weight. Another important evidence foundby this study is that the nutritional status of children with and without the Raskinprogram is not different in the long term. It has been found that the Raskin programin the past has no impact on child health seven years later., Using two waves of Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) collected in 2000and 2007, this paper examines the impact of the Indonesian food subsidies (Raskin)program in improving child health. In this paper, the health status of children isindicated by standardized height (height-for-age) and weight (weight-for-age)anthropometric measures (called as Z-score). As control variables, this study alsouses children, parents and households characteristics. The finding of this study isthat the Raskin program positively affects height of children living in eligiblehouseholds. On the other hand, there is not enough econometric evidence about theimpact of the Raskin program on child weight. Another important evidence foundby this study is that the nutritional status of children with and without the Raskinprogram is not different in the long term. It has been found that the Raskin programin the past has no impact on child health seven years later.]"

"Sea urchin are marine invertebrate. Taxonomist grouped the sea urchin in the filum echinodermata..."

"ABSTRACTThe recommendation and estimation of human energy and dietary requirement until today has been based only on the physiological needs of food nutrients. The fact that food is also an integral part of socialization process seemed to be ignored. In some communities beside having a social function, food is also used non-physiologically such as in religious ceremonies. It was hypothesized that for communities like Bali Island where food is used extensively for non-physiological purpose, such as in religious ceremonies, the present recommendation is still inadequate as--it failed to consider the food needed for that purpose. Furthermore it was believed that the quality and quantity of food used for that practice depends on the socio-economic status of the households.

---

The general objectives of this study was to observe the non-physiological. usage of food in Balinese household, in order to calculate the total food requirement of households for both physiological and social needs and to obtain information on the religious and cultural background or explanation of the practice.

---

The results of semi-structured interviews and observations on 60 households from two villages in Tabanan Districts, Bali, indicated that there were no statistically significant relationship between the quality and quantity of food used non-physiologically and the socio-economic status of the households. Based on the three alternate days 24-hour recall, it was calculated that the food used for' non-physiological purpose in terms of kcal amounted to 3.6 % of the total daily average energy intake of households in village Timpag and 4.1 % of households in Pandakbandung village. Based on observation, Focus Group Discussion and in-depth interview with selected key informants it was estimated that in term of energy, the average daily usage of food for non-physiological purpose for the whole year, were more than 641 kcal which equals to more than 7.5 % of aver-age daily calorie intake of-the sample households."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak tidak langsung gangguan kesehatan terhadap permintaan pangan dan non pangan rumah tangga. Dengan menggunakan data Susenas Panel tahun 2012 dan 2013 dan menerapkan two step heckman selection model untuk estimasi pendapatan dan seemingly unrelated regression estimator untuk estimasi konsumsi rumah tangga. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa gangguan kesehatan kepala rumah tangga akan menurunkan pendapatannya. Dampak ini akan lebih dirasakan oleh rumah tangga perempuan miskin dan bekerja di sektor pertanian. Penurunan pendapatan ini menyebabkan porsi pengeluaran konsumsi nonpangan menurun, khususnya untuk pengeluaran pemeliharaan perumahan, namun pengeluaran untuk perawatan tubuh justru meningkat. Sedangkan untuk porsi konsumsi pangan tidak terpengaruh.

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze the indirect effects of illhealth on household food and non- food demand. Using Susenas Panel data for 2012 and 2013 and applying a two-step heckman selection models for income estimation and seemingly unrelated regression estimators for household consumption estimation. The results show that illhealth of the head will reduce his income. The greater impact will be felt by poor women's households and whos working in agricultural. This decreasion make the share of non-food consumption to decline, especially for housing maintenance expenses, but expenditures for body care actually increased. But the portion of food consumption is not affected"