Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan tingkat oral health literacy (OHL)terhadap status klinis dan perilaku kesehatan gigi dan mulut serta denga faktor sosiodemografis pada lansia independen. Metode: Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah cross-sectional dengan total 195 subjek lansia di Kota Depok berusia 60 tahun ke atas dengan pengisian data sosiodemografis, kuesioner dengan metode wawancara mengenai tingkat oral health literacy menggunakan HeLD-29, dan kuesioner perilaku menjaga kesehatan gigi dan mulut. Status klinis dinilai melalui pemeriksaan klinis menggunakan indeks DMF-T, status periodontal menggunakan CPI-modified, status pemakaian gigi tiruan, status kebersihan mulut menggunakan indeks OHI-S, serta penilaian kemampuan mastikasi secara subjektif. Hasil: Rerataskor oral health literacy pada penelitian ini adalah 3,45±0,67. Nilai Cronbachs alpha = 0.945. Validitas diskriminan memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan kemampuan mastikasi (p<0,01) dan validitas konvergen memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan gigi hilang, skor DMF-T, dan kemampuan mastikasi (p<0,01), serta gigi yang direstorasi (p<0,05). Terdapat hubungan bermakna antara beberapa domain HeLD-29 dengan status klinis kesehatan gigi dan mulut. Perbedaan bermakna secara statistik juga terdapat pada jumlah gigi yang hilang, gigi yang direstorasi, dan poket periodontal antara kelompok dengan oral health literacy rendah dengan kelompok dengan oral health literacy tinggi (p<0,05). Didapatkan pula perbedaan rerata skor oral health literacy yang bermakna pada variabel usia dan tingkat pendidikan, serta adanya hubungan signifikan antara nilai DMF-T dengan frekuensi kunjungan ke dokter gigi dan antara perdarahan gingiva dengan status merokok. Kesimpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara tingkat oral health literacy dengan status klinis kesehatan gigi dan mulut serta dengan faktor sosiodemografis yaitu usia dan tingkat pendidikan pada lansia independen. Terdapat hubungan antara status klinis dengan perilaku kesehatan gigi dan mulut.

---

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between oral health literacy(OHL), oral healthstatus, and oral health behavior of independent elderly.

Methods: Cross-sectional study involved 195 independent living elderly in Depok aged 60 and above. The subjects completed a self-administered questionnaire collectin information about socio-demographics, Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD-29) questionnaire to assessed oral health literacy, and oral health behavior questionnaire by interviewing subjects. Oral health status was recorded by clinical oral examination using DMF-T index, CPI-modified, denture status, OHI-S, and the masticatory performance wasassessed subjectively.

Results: Oral health literacy mean score in this study is 3,45±0,67. The Cronbachs alpha = 0.945. The discriminant validity were confirmed by HeLD scores being significantly associated with mastication ability(p<0.01). The convergent validity were confirmed by HeLD score being significantly associated with amount of tooth loss, DMF-T score, and mastication ability (p<0,01) also with amount of filled teeth (p<0,05). There were correlations between some HeLD-29 domain with oral health status. There were significant differences of amount of tooth loss (M-T), amount of filled teeth (F-T), and amount of deep pocket between the group with low oral health literacy and the group with high oral health literacy (p<0,05). Statistical differences were also found between oral health literacy mean score amongst age and education level group. There were also correlations between DMF-T score and dental visits and between amount of bleeding on probing and smoking status of the subjects.

Conclusion: Oral health literacy was associated with oral health status and the socio-demographics such as age and education level there is a relationship between oral health status and oral health behavior in independent elderly."

"Clinical Research in Oral Health surveys the essentials of clinical research in oral health, anchoring these principles within the specific context of the oral health arena. Addressing research questions exclusively applicable to dentistry and oral health, the book thoroughly illustrates the principles and practice of oral health clinical research. Clinical Research in Oral Health also clarifies the framework of regulatory issues and presents emerging concepts in clinical translation, relating the research principles to clinical improvemen"

"Objective: This study aimed to determine the level of oral health literacy and behavior among health sciences university students. Methods: The method used descriptive cross-sectional survey involving 609 students from Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, Pharmacy and Allied Health Sciences in the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Oral health literacy level and behaviour was assessed with a validated and pretested self administered questionnaire using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) tool and modified Oral Health Adult Literacy Questionnaire (OHL-AQ). Results: Atotal of 509 participants involved in the study (83.6%). The overall mean oral health literacy score was 10.27 (95% CI 7.92, 12.62), which found dental students showing statistically significant higher scores (mean=11.36, 95% CI 9.70, 13.02) compared to medical (mean=10.72, 95% CI 8.67, 12.77), allied health sciences (mean=9.89, 95% CI 7.34, 12.44) and pharmacy (mean=9.55, 95% CI 7.23, 11.87). Almost all respondents are non-smokers (99.8%) and non-drinkers (97.2%). Only 19.1% pay regular dental visits every 6-12months while 51.1% visit dentist only when they have dental pain. There appears to be a positive relationship between oral health literacy and oral health behavior. Conclusion: Health science university students should be provided substantial dental health education in their curriculum as they could be potential strategic partners in oral health."

"This is an excellent and well-written book aimed at dental nurses studying for a qualification in oral health education ... This is a well thought out and clearly written publication, where the authors' knowledge and experiences are clearly conveyed to the reader. Although it is aimed at dental nurses, I believe this book will be an ideal revision aid for dentists, dental students, dental hygienists and therapists in their pursuit of oral health education and promotion."

"ABSTRAKTujuan: Mengetahui perbedaan penggunaan video animasi dan video nonanimasi sebagai media pendidikan dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan anak tunagrahita ringan mengenai kesehatan gigi dan mulutnya. Metode: Subjek penelitian adalah 20 siswa SDLB Ar-Rahman diberikan edukasi menggunakan video animasi dan 14 siswa SDLB Mahardika menggunakan video non-animasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pre and post test design. Hasil: Ada perbedaan bermakna antara peningkatan pengetahuan sebelum dan sesudah edukasi (p=0.000). Namun, tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara peningkatan pengetahuan menggunakan video animasi dengan menggunakan video nonanimasi (p=0.457). Kesimpulan: Video animasi dan non-animasi tidak memiliki perbedaan dalam meningkatkan pengetahuan kesehatan gigi dan mulut pada anaktunagrahita ringan.

---

ABSTRACTObjective: To determine the differences between animated and non-animated video as a medium of education in improving the knowledge of mild mental retardation children about their oral health. Methods: The subjects were 20 students of SLB Ar-Rahman, who were given education using animated video and 14 students of SLB Mahardika who were given education using non-animated video. This study used a pre and post test design. Results: There are significant differences in improvement of knowledge between before and after education (p=0.000). However, there are no significant difference between the increase in knowledge using animated viedo and using non-animated videos (p=0457).Conclusion: animated and non-animated video does not have a difference in improving the oral health knowledge on mild mental retardation children."