Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This book reviews the philosophies, theories, and principles that underpin assessment and evaluation in radiology education, highlighting emerging practices and work done in the field. The sometimes conflicting assessment and evaluation needs of accreditation bodies, academic programs, trainees, and patients are carefully considered. The final section of the book examines assessment and evaluation in practice, through the development of rich case studies reflecting the implementation of a variety of approaches. This is the third book in a trilogy devoted to radiology education. The previous two books focused on the culture and the learning organizations in which our future radiologists are educated and on the application of educational principles in the education of radiologists. Here, the trilogy comes full circle, attending to the assessment and evaluation of the education of its members has much to offer back to the learning of the organization."

"Sistem Informasi telah menjadi penunjang di era modern, termasuk di dunia medis, salah satunya di bidang pendidikan kedokteran. Dalam pendididkan kedokteran, Sistem Informasi digunakan dalam membantu kelancaran pendidikan kedokteran, baik untuk pengajaran, pengujian hingga penilaian. Salah satu metoda pengujian dalam Pendidikan kedokteran yaitu OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination). Dalam OSCE membutuhkan sumber daya yang besar. Sistem Informasi diintegrasikan dengan sistem audio visual diterapkan untuk meningkatkan efisiensi. Sistem Informasi dikembangkan untuk pelaksanaan OCSE di fakultas Kedokteran Unswagati. Kemudian desain yang dibuat diujicobakan untuk melihat pengaruhnya terhadap reliabilitas, validitas dan efisiensi. Hipotesis awal mengharapkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan dalam reliabilitas dan validitas OSCE, tetapi ada perubahan peningkatan efisiensi. Hasil pengujian menunjukan bahwa dengan penerapan Sistem Informasi terintegrasi audiovisual, menjadikan pelaksanaan OSCE reliabel, valid tetapi dengan peningkatan efisiensi.

---

Information system has been suppoting this modern era, including in the medical world, such as in medical education. In medical education, information system is being used to assist its fluency, such in teaching, examining and grading. One of the method to exam in medical education is called OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination. OSCE requires massive resources. An information system integrated with audiovisual system is applied to enhance the efficiency.

This Information system is developed for implementation of OSCE in Medical Faculty of Unswagati. The design is tested to see the influence to its reliability, validity and efficiency. Early hypothesis is there will be no significant difference on OSCE?s Reliability and Validity, but there will be a significant improvement on efficiency. The test result shows that with implementation of Audiovisual integrated Information system, causing a reliable and valid OSCE with improved eviciency."

"Tujuan Kemampuan penalaran kliiik odotoh salah salu kompetensi utama yang harus dimiliki oleh lulusan dokter sehingga perlu dilatih sejak mahasiswa. Akan tetapi, pembuktian kuantitatif tentangfaktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kemampuan penalaran klinik mahasiswa masih sangat sedikit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menenlukan pengaruhpengetahuan dan faktor lainnya terhadap kemampuan penalaran klinik mahasiswa sebagai bahan acuan dalam menentukan metode pembelajaran penalaran klinik.Melode Penetritian potong linlang dilakukan terhadap mahasiswa Fakuhas Kedokteran Universitas Sriwijaya program KBK semester IV Data yang diambil adalah tentang kemampuan penalaran klinik dengan faktor risikonya pada kasus sistem urogenital karena saat data diambil pada April 2008, mahasiswa baru menyelesaikan pembelajaran blokurogenilal. Kemampuan penalaran klinik dinilai dengan /es script concordance danfaktor risiko dinilai berdasarkanhasil evaluasiformatif, sumatif blok dan karakterisitk mahasiswa. Analisis data dilakukan dengan metode regresi Cox. Hasil Hasil penelitian terhadap 132 mahasiswa menunjukkan persentase kemampuan penalaran klinik yang rendah sebesar 38,694. Mahasiswa yang mempunyai pengetahuan yang rendah dibandingkan dengan yang tinggi mempunyai 63% lebih tinggi risiko mengalami penalaran klinik yang rendah (kR suaian : 1,63; 9594 interval kepercoyaan (C[): I,l0-2,42). Dibanding dengan kelompok mahasiswa yang lerampil berpikir kritis, mahasiswa yang tidak terampil berpikir ltritis lebih berisiko dua kali lebih mempunyai penalaran klinikyang rendah (M suaian: 2,30; 95% interval kepercayaan (CD: 1,55 - 3,41).Kesimpulan Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa mahasiswa yang tidak terampil berpikir kritis atau memiliki pengetahuan yang rendah memiliki kemampuan penalaran klinik yang rendah.

---

AbstractAim Clinical reasoning is one of the essential competencies for medical practitioners, so that it must be exercised by medical students. Studies on quantitative evidence of factors influencing clinical reasoning abilicy of students are limited. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of knowledge and other factors on the clinical reasoning abiliry ofthe students, which can serve as reference to establish methods for learning ctinical reasoning. Methods This is a cross-sectional study on fourth semester students enrolled in the Competency-based Curriculumof the Medical Faculty, University of Sriwijaya. Data on clinical reasoning abilily and risk factors during urogenital blockwere collected inApril 2008, when the students have just completed the btock. Clinical reasoning abiliry was tested using the Script Concordance test and the risk factors were evaluated based on formative tests, block summativeassessments, and student characteristics. Data were analyzed by Cox regression.Results The prevalence of low clinical reasoning ability of the 132 students was 38.6%. The group with low basic knowledge was found to have 63% risk ol low clinical reasoning abiliry when compared to those with high basic knowledge (adjusted RR = 1.63; 95% conidence intewal (Ct): 1.10 -2.42). When compared to students with high critical thinking skitls, those with lory critical thinking skills had 2.3 time to be low clinical reasoning abitity (adjusted RR : 2.30; 9s% CI: 1.55 - 3.41).Conclusion Students with low critical thinking skills or with inadequate knowledge had a higher risk of low clinical reasoning ability."