Ditemukan 31154 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
Merrills, J.G.
London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1984
341.52 MER i
Buku Teks Universitas Indonesia Library
Merrills, J.G.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995
341.52 MER i
Buku Teks Universitas Indonesia Library
Orrego Vicuna, Fransisco
New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004
341.52 ORR i
Buku Teks Universitas Indonesia Library
Washington, D.c.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001
327.17 TUR
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
London:
1995
341 INT
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Cambridge, UK: Grotius, 1994
341.752 ICS
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
White, N.D.
Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993
341.23 WHI k
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Tacsan, Joaquin
Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992
341.52 TAC d
Buku Teks Universitas Indonesia Library
Alfi Fudhola
"International Center for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) merupakan forum penyelesaian sengketa investasi antara investor asing dengan negara penerima investasi (host state). Lembaga ini didirikan atas prakarsa dari International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) pada tanggal 18 Maret 1965 dengan membentuk Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (Konvensi ICSID). Pada perkembanganya, proses penyelesaian sengketa di ICSID menuai banyak kritik terutama dari negara-negara berkembang. Kritik tersebut meliputi permasalahan arbiter yang dapat memiliki peran ganda sehingga menimbulkan isu konflik kepentingan, permasalahan tidak adanya batasan waktu sehingga mengakibatkan durasi waktu yang lama, permasalahan biaya yang mahal untuk biaya penasihat hukum, biaya prosedural (legal cost) dan biaya insidentil lainya, dan implikasi adanya mekanisme pembatalan yang menyebabkan timbulnya isu kepastian hukum pada putusan. Permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut merupakan permasalahan yang menjadi isu bagi negara berkembang termasuk Indonesia. Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia terkait peninjauan Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) merupakan momentum yang tepat untuk mengkaji ulang keanggotaan Indonesia di ICSID, terkait Indonesia harus melakukan penarikan diri dari ICSID ataukah Indonesia harus tetap menjadi anggota ICSID dengan melakukan tindakantindakan yang sesuai.
International Center for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) is an investment dispute resolution forum between foreign investors and host state. ICSID was established by initiative of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) on March 18, 1965 to form the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention). In its development, the process of dispute resolution in the ICSID gets a lot of criticism, especially from developing countries. The criticisms include concerns that the arbitrator may have a dual role which rise an issue of conflict of interest; no limitation time which is stipulated in ICSID Convention resulting in long duration of time; cost problems including cost of legal counsel, procedural costs (legal costs) and other expenses incidental cost; and implications of annulment mechanism that causes the issue of legal certainty in the decision. These problems have become an issue for developing countries, including Indonesia. Indonesian government's policy to review the Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) is an appropriate moment to review Indonesia's membership in ICSID: either Indonesia must withdraw from ICSID or Indonesia should remain its membership by performing the appropriate actions."
Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014
S56038
UI - Skripsi Membership Universitas Indonesia Library
Foltea, Marina, 1977-
""This book analyses the role of international organisations in WTO dispute settlement as arising from a number of WTO disputes. In particular, the roles of the IMF, WIPO, WCO and WHO are addressed. The use of the Vienna Convention rules of interpretation framework allows an evaluation of the weight attributed to this material by the WTO adjudicator. This allows specific conclusions to be drawn regarding the level of institutional sensitivity of the WTO adjudicator to each of the organisations. As well as being a valuable source of research, the analysis will appeal to international law scholars, civil servants and law practitioners interested in the WTO and dispute settlement"-- Provided by publisher.
"
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012
382.92 FOL i
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library