Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Peristiwa Uberlingen Mid-Air Collision tahun 2002 di wilayah Jerman antara Bashkirian Airlines dengan DHL menarik perhatian khalayak luas kepada dunia penerbangan internasional. Bashkirian kemudian membawa kasus ini ke Pengadilan Konstanz di Jerman dalam perkara perdata untuk meminta ganti kerugian kepada Jerman atas segala tuntutan dari pihak ketiga. Pengadilan kemudian memutuskan Jerman harus bertanggung jawab atas peristiwa tersebut dan harus menanggung biaya ganti kerugian akibat peristiwa tersebut. Diketahui bahwa kejadian tersebut berada di wilayah udara Jerman yang lalu-lintas penerbangannya dilakukan oleh Skyguide. Skripsi ini dimaksudkan untuk menjelaskan bentuk tanggung jawab negara atas keselamatan dan keamanan navigasi di wilayah udaranya yang apabila tidak dilakukan dapat menimbulkan tanggung jawab negara. Skripsi ini kemudian akan menganalisis terkait pengaturan dan kewajiban negara dalam memberikan fasilitas navigasi penerbangan yang aman menurut hukum internasional.

---

The Uberlingen Mid-Air Collision which happened in Germany in 2002 between Bashkirian Airlines and DHL had attracted the international community to international civil aviation activities. Bashkirian then brought this case before the Dictrict Court in Konstanz which sued Republic of Germany to indemnify the company for damage claims against the airine by third parties. The Court then decided Germany should responsible to Bashkirian and indemnify all the cost claimed against the airline. The collision occured at German?s territory which controlled by Skyguide. This thesis is aimed to elaborate the state liability on safety and security of air navigation in its territory which failure to do so will result a state responsibility. This thesis will analyze the provisions and the state?s liabilities in providing the safe air navigation facilities according to international law."

"ABSTRAKPelanggaran wilayah udara dan kontrol udara Indonesia oleh Singapuramerupakanaspek penting dan strategis bagi pertahanan dan keamanan wilayah negara Indonesia.Perhatian pemerintah Indonesia terhadap pentingnya ruang udara menunjukkan bahwakualitas kebijakan negara terhadap matra udara belum signifikan. Ruang udara Indonesiayang dikontrol oleh Singapura merupakan merupakan hal penting bagi Indonesia untukditinjau kembali dalam rangka menegakkan keutuhan negara.Perjanjian antara Indonesia dan Singapura soal ruang udara dalam pelaksanaannyatelah banyak menimbulkan kendala baik dari penerbangan sipil Indonesia maupunpelaksanaan operasi dan penegakan hukum di wilayah sekitar Tanjung Pinang dan Natunayang dilaksanakan baik oleh TNI AU maupun oleh TNI AL yang melaksanakan operasimaritim maupun operasi udara, karena pengendalian ruang udara tersebut ada pada AirTraffic Control (ATC) Singapura.Sebagai pijakan teoritis penelitian ini menggunakan teori pembangunan politikdari Samuel P. Huntington, teori orientasi pembuat kebijakan dari K.J. Holsti, dan teorikebijakan publik menurut William Dunn. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalahmetode kualitatif, sedangkan tipe penelitian adalah deskriptif analisis sedangkan metodepengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan studi dokumen.Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan yang diambil oleh pemerintahIndonesia terkait Flight Information Region (FIR) tidak sesuai dengan kepentinganpertahanan udara nasional Indonesia. TNI AU sebagai pelaksana tugas pokok pertahanannasional matra udara bukan menjadi pihak insider untuk turut menentukan lahirnyakebijakan negara di bidang FIR. Pengambilan keputusan hanya berada dalam satu lembaganegara dan tidak mengikutsertakan lembaga lain yang berkompeten dalam merumuskankebijakan strategis.Implikasi teori menunjukkan bahwa terori Huntington yang mengatakan bahwa salahsatu unsur dari pembangunan politik (antara lain) membutuhkan penonjolan tegaskedaulatan eksternal negara bangsa dalam menangkal pengaruh internasional. TesisHuntington tersebut mensyaratkan adanya ketegasan dengan menggunakan seluruhotoritasnya dalam menjaga seluruh wilayah kedaulatannya. Sementara K.J. Holstimengatakan bahwa dalam proses pembuatan kebijakan luar negeri, pengambilan keputusandidominasi oleh orientasi para pembuat kebijakan tingkat tinggi (high level policy makers).Holsti memberikan penekanan yang lebih kuat tentang pentingnya melihat orientasi parapembuat keputusan/kebijakan. Pendapat kedua ahli tersebut tidak terlihat digunakan dalampembuatan kebijakan di Indonesia. Selain itu tahapan kebijakan publik dari William Dunnseperti : Penyusunan Agenda, Formulasi kebijakan, Adopsi Kebijakan, ImplementasiKebijakan, Evaluasi Kebijakan tidak menjadi referensi bagi pengambil kebijakan negaraIndonesia.

---

ABSTRACTThe violation of the Indonesian air space and the control to Singapore isthe crucial aspect even strategic to Indonesian security and defense. The deficientof Indonesian government attention to the air space is showing the quality of statepolicy to airspace tends to less significant. The air space, which has beencontrolling by Singapore, is becoming big issue to be reviewed in building theIndonesian sovereignty.The agreement of air space between Indonesia and Singapore has impactedto Indonesian civil flights even for operation implementation and law enforcementin Tanjung Pinang and Natuna authorities that conducted by both IndonesianNavy and Air Force that have implemented maritime and air space operations asthe control base of air space using the Singapore Air Traffic Control (ATC).The theoretical base of this research applies the politic development ofSamuel P. Huntington, policy maker orientation theory of K.J. Holsti, and thetheory of public policy by William Dunn. This research is implemented aqualitative method and used descriptive analysis research type with interviewingand documents study in gaining the data collection.The findings from this research have shown that the policy of Indonesiangovernment dealing with Flight Information Region (FIR) did not meet with theneed of Indonesian national air force defense. The Indonesian Air force as theagent of the main duty in defending the national air space is not the insider partyin determining state policies of FIR. The decision making was merely determinedin a state institution without involving related institutions that have competence indesigning strategic policy.Theory implication is showing that Huntington theory revealed that oneelement in politic development acquires a firm state and country externalsovereignty in preventing international effects. Huntington thesis requiresfirmness in using whole authorities to defend all Indonesian sovereignty areas.Meanwhile, K.J. Holsti said that in a process of designing overseas policy, thedecision taking dominated by an orientation of high level policy makers. Holstistrongly emphasized to the importance of orientation observation of the decisionand policy makers. The opinion of the both experts seems unlikely implementedin policy designing in Indonesia. In addition, the William Dunn of public policysuch as: Agenda arrangement, Policy formulation, Policy adoption, Policyimplementation, and Policy evaluation are not implemented as references inpolicy taking in Indonesia."

"[Some of the subjects discussed in this book are : sovereignty in airspace, flight information and air defence identification zones, rules of the air, personnel licensing, meteorological services, operations of aircraft; air traffic services, accident and incident investigation, aerodromes, efficiency aspects of aviation and environmental protection, aeronautical charts and information, the carriage of dangerous goods, and NextGen and SESAR., Some of the subjects discussed in this book are : sovereignty in airspace, flight information and air defence identification zones, rules of the air, personnel licensing, meteorological services, operations of aircraft; air traffic services, accident and incident investigation, aerodromes, efficiency aspects of aviation and environmental protection, aeronautical charts and information, the carriage of dangerous goods, and NextGen and SESAR.]"

"This text covers the history and development of air and space law: their interrelationships; their relationships with the law of the seas and the law of Antarctica; institutions working in the field of air and space law; sovereignty in national airspace; freedom of exploration and use of outer space; public international air law; penal air law; private international air law, especially liability law; and public and private space law. Much attention is devoted to the law of air commerce: bilateral air services agreements; inter-airline co-operation; the effects of competition, antitrust and European Union law; deregulation, privatisation and commercialisation of air transport; ownership and control of airlines, and airline alliances; multilateralisation of air transport; and congestion and environmental controls. The last chapter of the book briefly deals with the legal aspects of commercial outer space applications. Increasingly, air transport, both in fact and in law, is becoming an ordinary industry like any other and is being treated as such. Rapidly, commercial outer space activities are being privatised and commercialised"

"This text covers the history and development of air and space law: their interrelationships; their relationships with the law of the seas and the law of Antarctica; institutions working in the field of air and space law; sovereignty in national airspace; freedom of exploration and use of outer space; public international air law; penal air law; private international air law, especially liability law; and public and private space law. Much attention is devoted to the law of air commerce: bilateral air services agreements; inter-airline co-operation; the effects of competition, antitrust and European Union law; deregulation, privatisation and commercialisation of air transport; ownership and control of airlines, and airline alliances; multilateralisation of air transport; and congestion and environmental controls. The last chapter of the book briefly deals with the legal aspects of commercial outer space applications. Increasingly, air transport, both in fact and in law, is becoming an ordinary industry like any other and is being treated as such. Rapidly, commercial outer space activities are being privatised and commercialised"