Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Anyone suffering under the crushing weight of debt knows how impossible it can seem to find a way out. It's overwhelming - and the more complicated the proposed solution, the harder it is to stick with it. That's why "The Debt-Free Spending Plan" is simple. It doesn't require sifting through chapters of high-minded financial advice or digging up your past spending history. It assumes you need help right now, and gives it to you. You will learn to: downsize expenses without feeling deprived; allocate money as it comes in and put together an easy-to-manage bill-paying plan; adjust for inevitable overspending; and, pay off debt without gouging expenses and (believe it or not) start saving. The plan is clear, easy, and takes just five minutes a day-and it doesn't matter if you make $14,000 or $14 million. With straightforward daily spending strategies and effortless expense tracking tools, you will soon find yourself on the road to financial freedom-all before the next billing cycle."

"Balanced scorecard digunakan pertama kali oleh organisasi sektor privat dalam rangka mengukur kinerja proses internal bisnis sebuah perusahaan menghasilkan laba, kemudian organisasi sektor publik mulai menggunakan pendekatan ini dalam rangka mengukur kinerja organisasi melayani dan meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Organisasi sektor publik di Indonesia yang pertama kali menggunakan balanced scorecard adalah Kementerian Keuangan dengan diterbitkannya Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 87/KMK.01/2009 tentang Pengelolaan Indikator Kinerja Utama di Lingkungan Departemen Keuangan pada tanggal 24 Maret 2009. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi penerapan balanced scorecard di Kementerian Keuangan pada tahun 2017 setelah delapan tahun balanced scorecard tersebut pertama kali diterapkan. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga hendak memperbandingkan balanced scorecard tersebut dengan tahun sebelumnya untuk melihat adanya upaya perbaikan atau peningkatan kinerja dari tahun sebelumnya serta analisis atas tercapainya dan tidak tercapainya masing-masing IKU Menteri Keuangan. Terdapat 12 sasaran strategis Kementerian Keuangan dengan terdiri dari 27 Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU) dan 2 sub IKU yang peneliti evaluasi. 

---

Balanced scorecard was used for the first time by private sector organizations in order to measure the internal business process performance of a company to generate profits, then public sector organizations began to use this approach in order to measure the performance of organizations in order to serving and improving peoples welfare. The public sector organizations in Indonesia that first used the balanced scorecard were the Ministry of Finance with the issuance of Minister of Finance Decree Number 87/KMK.01/2009 concerning Management of Key Performance Indicators in the Ministry of Finance on March 24, 2009. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate applied balanced scorecard at the Ministry of Finance in 2017 after eight years of balanced scorecard was first applied. In addition, this study also wants to compare the balanced scorecard with the previous year to see any improvement or performance improvement from the previous year and an analysis of achieved and non-achieved of each Minister of Finance KPIs. There are 12 strategic objectives of the Ministry of Finance consisting of 27 Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and 2 sub-KPI which are researchers evaluated."

"[ABSTRAKSkripsi ini berfokus pada analisis kelayakan dari sistem e-audit yang digunakan oleh Pemeriksa BPK RI untuk melakukan pemeriksaan keuangan negara. Analisis kelayakan diperlukan agar BPK RI dapat memanfaatkan teknologi yang dapat menambah nilai dari hasil pemeriksaan serta dapat menggunakan teknologi dengan tepat guna sesuai dengan proses pemeriksaan keuangan negara. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Data utama didapatkan dari wawancara mendalam dengan responden pemeriksa BPK dan tim pengembangan sistem e-audit. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem e-audit sudah layak digunakan dalam pemeriksaan keuangan negara. Namun peneliti menyarankan kepada BPK agar lebih aktif lagi dalam menangkap kebutuhan pengguna akhir yaitu pemeriksa, sehingga dapat dipastikan kebutuhan pengguna akhir dan jadwal pengembangan sistem di masa yang akan datang serta supaya pengembangan sistem sesuai dengan yang dibutuhkan pengguna. Selain itu, BPK juga harus mempertimbangkan untuk mulai melakukan seleksi jasa profesional Teknologi Informasi untuk membantu dalam pengembangan sistem e-audit karena besar kemungkinan banyaknya kebutuhan dari pengguna akhir di masa yang akan datang.ABSTRACTThis study focuses on the analysis of the feasibility of e-audit system used by BPK Auditors to audit state finances. The feasibility analysis is required in order to utilize technology that can increase the value of the audit results and can use the appropriate technology according to the state finances audit process. This research use descriptive qualitative method. The main data obtained from in-depth interviews with respondents from BPK Auditors and development team of e-audit system. The results showed that the e-audit system already feasible for use in the state finances audit process. The researchers suggested for the BPK to be more active in capturing end user requirements, ensuring the end user requirements and system development schedule in the future are met, and ensuring development of the system is met with the end user requirements. In addition, BPK also had to consider to begin selecting information technology professional services to assist in the development of e-audit system because most likely there are many end user requirements in the future., This study focuses on the analysis of the feasibility of e-audit system used by BPK Auditors to audit state finances. The feasibility analysis is required in order to utilize technology that can increase the value of the audit results and can use the appropriate technology according to the state finances audit process. This research use descriptive qualitative method. The main data obtained from in-depth interviews with respondents from BPK Auditors and development team of e-audit system. The results showed that the e-audit system already feasible for use in the state finances audit process. The researchers suggested for the BPK to be more active in capturing end user requirements, ensuring the end user requirements and system development schedule in the future are met, and ensuring development of the system is met with the end user requirements. In addition, BPK also had to consider to begin selecting information technology professional services to assist in the development of e-audit system because most likely there are many end user requirements in the future.]"

"Kebijakan penggabungan Undang-Undang mengenai Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah (UU Nomor 33 Tahun 2004) dan Undang-Undang mengenai Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2009) merupakan penguatan pelaksanaan otonomi daerah yang mulai berkembang, sejalan dengan penyusunan peraturan perundang-undangan yang saat ini cenderung sifatnya simplifikasi. Melalui penyederhanaan regulasi ini terdapat satu kesatuan pengaturan mengenai keuangan daerah baik yang berasal dari perpajakan daerah ataupun dari Transfer ke Daerah. Pengaturan penguatan ini memfokuskan pada signifikannya revenue dan expenditure assignment antar level pemerintahan, yang diharapkan dapat mewujudkan pemerataan layanan publik dan kesejahteraan masyarakat di daerah untuk peningkatan kualitas pelaksanaan desentralisasi fiskal di Indonesia, melalui penguatan belanja daerah, dengan diaturnya batasan-batasan penggunaan belanja daerah, selain itu juga dengan pemutakhiran kebijakan Transfer ke Daerah berbasis kinerja, pengembangan sistem pajak daerah yang efisien, perluasan skema pembiayaan daerah, dan harmonisasi belanja pusat dan daerah

---

The policy of merging the Law on Fiscal Balance between the Central Government and Regional Governments (Law Number 33 of 2004) and the Law on Regional Taxes and Levies (Law Number 28 of 2009) is a strengthening of the implementation of regional autonomy which is starting to develop, in line with the preparation of legislation that currently tends to be simplistic in nature. Through this simplification, there is a unified arrangement of regional finances, either from regional taxation or from transfers to regions. This strengthening arrangement focuses on the significance of revenue and expenditure assignments between levels of government, which is expected to realize equitable distribution of public services and community welfare in the regions to improve the quality of the implementation of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia, through strengthening regional expenditures, by setting limits on the use of regional expenditures, in addition to It also includes updating the performance-based Transfer to Regions policy, developing an efficient regional tax system, expanding regional financing schemes, and harmonizing central and regional expenditures."

"Pembentukan Lembaga Pengelola Investasi (LPI) atau Indonesia Investment Authority sebagai pengelola sovereign wealth fund di Indonesia telah menghadirkan beragam diskusi. Secara teoretis lembaga ini memiliki keuangan yang terpisah dengan keuangan negara yang berimplikasi pada pemeriksaan atas pengelolaan dan tanggung jawab keuangannya. Persoalan muncul ketika Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara masih mendefinisikan keuangan negara secara luas, dimana kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan termasuk di dalamnya. Hal ini memunculkan diskursus perihal kewenangan BPK sebagai pemeriksa pengelolaan dan tanggung jawab keuangan negara, untuk ikut melakukan pemeriksaan atas keuangan LPI. Pada tesis ini akan diteliti apakah BPK memiliki kewenangan untuk melakukan pemeriksaan atas keuangan LPI dan bagaimana bentuk pemeriksaan yang dapat dilakukan terhadap keuangan LPI. Tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum dengan tipologi penelitian eksplanatoris. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah, pertama, ditinjau dari segi teoretis maupun normatif BPK tidak berwenang untuk melakukan pemeriksaan keuangan LPI. Kedua, bentuk pengawasan terhadap pengelolaan dan tanggung jawab keuangan LPI dilakukan melalui mekanisme pemeriksaan keuangan oleh Akuntan Publik berdasarkan standar pemeriksaan internasional yang berlaku bagi badan hukum pengelola investasi. Sedangkan dari sisi pengelolaan, kontrol negara terhadap penyertaan modal pada LPI dilakukan melalui pengendalian internal dengan ditempatkannya wakil-wakil Pemerintah dalam organ Dewan Pengawas LPI dan kewajiban penyampaian laporan tahunan kepada Presiden. Namun demikian, diperlukan pengaturan lebih lanjut mengenai tindak lanjut terhadap laporan pertanggungjawaban yang disampaikan kepada Presiden, sehingga mekanisme pengawasan keuangan Lembaga dapat dilakukan lebih akurat dan efektif.

---

The establishment of Indonesia Investment Authority (INA) as a manager of sovereign wealth fund in Indonesia has presented various discussion, especially regarding its institutional and financial status. Theoretically, INA’s finance is separated from state finance so it’s implicates the audit mechanism from this institution. Problems arise when Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning State Finance still defines state finance broadly, which separated state assets are included in. This gave rise to a discourse regarding the authority of the BPK as an examiner of state finances, to participate in conducting audit of INA’s finance. This theses will be investigated whether BPK has the authority to conduct audits on INA’s finance or not, and what forms of audits can be carried out on INA’s finance. This research uses legal research method with an explanatory typology. The conclusions obtained from this study are, first, based on theory and normative perspective analysis, BPK is not authorized to conduct INA’s financial audit. Second, the supervision of INA’s finance is conducted by public accountant based on international audit standards which applicable to investment management legal entity. Meanwhile, the form of state supervision for state equity participation in INA is carried out through internal control by placing government representatives in the INA’s Supervisory Board and obligate it institution to submit annual reports to President. However, further regulation is needed regarding the follow-up to the accountability reports submitted to the President, so that the institutional financial supervision mechanism can be carried out accurately and effectively."