Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In this engaging and comprehensive introduction to the topic of toleration, Andrew Jason Cohen seeks to answer fundamental questions, such as: What is toleration? What should be tolerated? Why is toleration important?

Beginning with some key insights into what we mean by toleration, Cohen goes on to investigate what should be tolerated and why. We should not be free to do everything�Nmurder, rape, and theft, for clear examples, should not be tolerated. But should we be free to take drugs, hire a prostitute, or kill ourselves? Should our governments outlaw such activities or tolera."

""This collection of essays draws together innovative scholars to examine the relationship between two legal and political phenomena: the shrinking of the state as a monopoly of power in favour of the expansion of power over individuals in private hands, and the change in the nature of rights. The authors expertly discuss the implications of the changing boundaries of state power, the legal responses to this development, its application to human rights, and re-conceptualizations of public life as obligations are handed over to private hands. This innovative book deals with an important set of problems and offers a fresh perspective of different legal themes in an integrated fashion"--"

"Indigenous hunting has always been an indigenous human rights core issue that has received high attention in the conflict between national laws and indigenous legal traditions. J.Y. Interpretation No. 803 affirmed indigenous hunting culture is a constitutional guaranteed fundamental right enjoyed by individual indigenous people. Nevertheless, the said Interpretation did not satisfy indigenous claimant’s assertions. The most critical are the collective nature of indigenous right and the aboriginal title still in the predicament of unclear concept and undetermined content. This article starts with a brief comparative law study, and then analyzes the said Interpretation, and continues with the theory of multicultural constitutionalism to make the argument based on the indigenous claims of traditional territorial rights."

"Economic, social, and cultural rights are protected by an international covenant, recently amended by the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which allows individuals to bring rights violations before a UN committee. This book addresses how successfully these rights are implemented and safeguarded worldwide, assessing the key challenges to their protection."

"Masyarakat hukum adat sebagai suatu masyarakat yang tetap dan teratur telah berkembang secara internasional hal ini di dukung dengan adanya pembentukan United Nations Declaration on the rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP) yang telah disahkan oleh PBB pada tahun 2007. Di Indonesia ketentuan mengenai masyarakat hukum adat telah tertuang pada Pasal 18 B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tulisan ini disusun dengan menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Dengan menganalisis bagaiman a pembentukan Rancangan Undang – Undang (RUU) tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat berpengaruh terhadap upaya pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi masyarakat hukum adat. Rencana pembentukan RUU tentang masyarakat hukum adat tersebut telah ada sejak tahun 2004, dan pada tahun 2016 hingga 2018 RUU tersebut sudah masuk kedalam Program Legislasi Nasional (Prolegnas) di dalam DPR. Namun hingga saat ini RUU tersebut belum juga dilakukan pengesahan oleh pemerintah. Senyatanya pembentukan RUU tersebut sudah ada masuk dalam tahap urgensi seperti banyak kasus perampasan wilayah yang menimpa masyarakat hukum adat, pelanggaran hak atas free, prior, dan informed consent (FPIC) yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat hukum adat terhadap pernyataan persetujuan atas suatu agenda, pelanggaran terhadap hak konstitusional termasuk hak politik, serta perempuan adat yang sering dihadapkan terhadap permasalahan diskriminasi. Dalam RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat yang saat ini masuk dalam tahap pembahasan DPR juga tak luput dari permasalahan, beberapa pasal menimbulkan kerancuan dalam implementasinya misalkan Pasal 11 hingga Pasal 17 yang memuat mengenai proses identifikasi dan verifikasi, Pasal 6 terhadap ketentuan persyaratan, Pasal 22 terhadap ketentuan perlindungan, dan Pasal 20 terhadap ketentuan evaluasi. Beberapa pasal dan ketentuan tersebut belum mencerminkan tujuan utama pembentukan RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat, namun secara nyata hal tersebut justru banyak mengurangi hak yang seharusnya diperoleh oleh masyarakat. Hal inilah yang menjadikan pengesahan RUU tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat menjadi hal yang penting disahkan untuk melakukan pemenuhan dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi masyarakat hukum adat.

---

Indigenous Peoples, as stable and organized societies, have developed internationally, supported by the establishment of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which was ratified by the UN in 2007. In Indonesia, provisions concerning indigenous peoples are outlined in Article 18B, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This paper is composed using doctrinal research methods. It analyses how the drafting of the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples impacts efforts to fulfill and protect human rights for indigenous legal communities. The plan to establish the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples has been in place since 2004, and from 2016 to 2018, the draft law was included in the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) within the House of Representatives (DPR). However, to date, the draft law has not yet been enacted by the government. In fact, the drafting of this draft law has reached an urgent stage due to numerous cases of territorial seizures affecting indigenous legal communities, violations of the right to free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) regarding their approval of certain agendas, violations of constitutional rights including political rights, and indigenous women often facing issues of discrimination. The Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples currently under discussion in the DPR is not without problems. Several articles cause confusion in their implementation, such as Articles 11 to 17, which cover the processes of identification and verification. Article 6, which pertains to the requirements. Article 22, which concerns protection provisions. And Article 20, which deals with evaluation provisions. These articles and provisions do not yet reflect the main objectives of forming the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples. In fact, they often diminish the rights that should be granted to the communities. This underscores the importance of enacting the Draft Law on Indigenous Peoples to ensure the fulfillment and protection of human rights for Indigenous Peoples."