Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini menyorot bantuan luar negeri Norwegia yang ditujukan untuk pembangunan lingkungan melalui program REDD di Indonesia. Tujuan tesis ini yaitu untuk melihat motif bantuan Norwegia dengan menggunakan konsep ontological security. Konsep ontological security yang digunakan untuk menganalisis terdiri dari tiga variabel yaitu afirmasi identitas diri, aksi sosial, dan dorongan kehormatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif untuk mengelaborasi hingga sejauh apa ontological security berpengaruh terhadap kelanjutan kerjasama antara Norwegia dengan Indonesia dalam program REDD+. Hasil dalam penelitian ini menunjukan meskipun pelaksanaan program REDD di Indonesia tidak berjalan lancar, Norwegia tetap mendukung Indonesia untuk menyelesaikan pelaksanaan program REDD+. Alasan Norwegia tetap mendukung pelaksanaan REDD di Indonesia, karena Norwegiamenilai REDD merupakan sarana untuk memenuhi kebutuhan ontologisnya. Dengan tetap mendukung upaya pelaksanaan REDD+ di Indonesia, kebutuhan afirmasiidentitas diri dan dorongan kehormatan yang diraih melalui aksi sosial akan dapat terpenuhi. Kesuksesan pelaksanaan program REDD+ akan meningkatkan reputasi dan kehormatan Norwegia di mata negara-negara lain.

---

This thesis highlights Norway rsquo's foreign aid for environmental development through REDD+ program in Indonesia. This research aims to uncover the true motive of Norway rsquo's foreign aid by employing ontological security concept. Ontological security comprises three variables self identity affirmation, social act, and honor driven. This research uses qualitative method to elaborate how far those three variables affect the continuity of bilateral cooperation between Norway and Indonesia.

This research shows that even though REDD implementation does not run properly, Norway is still keeping their support for Indonesia to complete REDD+ program. It is found that the main reason of continuing support is because Norway perceives REDD+ as a vehicle to fulfill its ontological interest. By supporting REDD+ in Indonesia, the self identity needs can be affirmed while the honor driven achieved through social acts can be fulfilled. This research concludes that the success of REDD+ in Indonesia would improve Norway rsquo's reputation and dignity in front of other countries."

"Ilmu hubungan internasional memiliki tiga paradigma utama; realisme, liberalisme, dan kontruktivisme yang khas dalam memandang institusi. Tulisan ini akan melihat dan membandingkan bagaimana ketiga paradigma ini memandang ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. Pada akhirnya, dapat diketahui keunikan dan kelemahan masing-masing paradigma dalam memandang kerjasama keamanan di Asia Tenggara ini. Realisme memandang security dilemma sebagai faktor kunci munculnya kerjasama, sedangkan liberalisme memandang institusionalisme sebagai faktor determinan. Di sisi lain, konstruktivisme menakankan pada identitas kolektif yang terkonstruksi di antara negara-negara anggota APSC 2015.

---

International relations has three major paradigms: realism, liberalism, and constructivism that has distinct view on institution. This paper will compare how the three paradigms asses the ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. In the end, the uniqueness and weaknesses of each paradigm will be identified. Realism regards security dilemma as a key factor in the emergence of security cooperation, while liberalism sees institutionalism as a determinant factor. On the other hand, constructivism emphasizes on collective identity that is constructed among the member countries of APSC 2015."

"In the context of massive environmental problems in Southeast Asia, the countries in the region have decided, at least in some instances, to create regimes to solve these problems jointly. This empirical observation is surprising, given the Southeast Asian countries? general reluctance to regional cooperation, the governance and budgetary constraints that are typical for developing countries and the huge heterogeneity of the involved countries in terms of environmental vulnerability, economic capacity and hegemonic power. This book analyzes the creation and effectiveness of two environmental regimes, one on transboundary haze pollution and a second on resource management of the Mekong. It will be shown that regime creation is extremely problematic and strategies to overcome conflicting actor constellations are mostly lacking."